Predicting Interresidue Contacts Using Templates and Pathways

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2003, Pages 497-502

  Shao, Yu ^a   Bystroff, Christopher ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact maps; Hidden Markov models; HMMSTR; I sites; Predictions; Protein folding; Rosetta; Rule based

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AUTOMATION; CASP5 TARGET; CONFERENCE PAPER; DNA TEMPLATE; HMMSTR CM; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TARGETING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 0042721397     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10539     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Michael TS, Quint T. Sphere of influence graphs in general metric spaces. Math Comput Model 1999;29:45-53.
2. Crippen GM, Havel, T. F. Distance geometry and molecular conformation. Chemometrics Series, 15. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
3. Aszodi A, Munro RE, Taylor WR. Distance geometry based comparative modelling, Fold Des 1997;2:S3-S6.
4. Brunger AT, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Karplus M. Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83:3801-3805.
5. Vondruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des 1997;2:295-306.
6. Fariselli P, Casadio R. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng 1999;12:15-21.
7. Pollastri G, Baldi P. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 2002;18 Suppl 1: S62-S70.
8. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 1997;2:S25-S32.
9. Singer MS, Vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Protein Eng 2002;15:721-725.
10. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 1998;277:419-448.
11. Zhang C, Kim SH. Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:2550-2555.
12. Hu J, Shen X, Shao Y, Bystroff C, Zaki MJ. BIOKDD 2002, Edmonton, Canada; 2002.
13. Zaki MJ, Shan J, Bystroff C. Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Bio-Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Arlington, VA, USA; 2000.
14. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:157-162.
15. Nolting B, Andert K. Mechanism of protein folding. Proteins 2000;41:288-298.
16. Baldwin RL. The nature of protein folding pathways: the classical versus the view. J Biomol NMR 1995;5:103-109.
17. Fersht AR. Optimization of rates of protein folding: the nucleation-condensation mechanism and its implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:10869-10873.
18. Galzitskaya OV, Ivankov DN, Finkelstein AV. Folding nuclei in proteins. FEBS Lett 2001;489:113-118.
19. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
20. Bystroff C, Shao Y. Fully automated ab initio protein structure prediction using I-SITES, HMMSTR and ROSETTA. Bioinformatics 2002;18 Suppl 1:S54-S61.
21. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
22. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
23. Bonneau R, Strauss CE, Baker D. Improving the performance of Rosetta using multiple sequence alignment information and global measures of hydrophobic core formation. Proteins 2001;43:1-11.
24. Bystroff C, Thorsson V, Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;301:173-190.
25. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
26. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 1989;77:257-286.
27. Baum LE, Petrie T. Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Ann Math Stat 1966;37:1554-1563.
28. Zhu J, Liu JS, Lawrence CE. Bayesian adaptive sequence alignment algorithms. Bioinformatics 1998;14:25-39.
29. Sternberg MJ, Thornton JM. On the conformation of proteins: the handedness of the beta-strand-alpha-helix-beta-strand unit. J Mol Biol 1976;105:367-382.
30. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.