Recovery of protein structure from contact maps

Folding and Design

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 295-306

  Vendruscolo, Michele ^a   Kussell, Edo ^b   Domany, Eytan ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact; Distance; Dynamics; Map; Protein; Reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; FORECASTING; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; STEREOISOMERISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; FORECASTING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; RESEARCH DESIGN; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 0030627407     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00041-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Lifson, S. & Sander, C. (1979). Antiparallel and parallel beta strands differ in amino acids residue preferences. Nature 282, 109-111.
2. Havel, T.F., Grippen, G.M. & Kuntz, I.D. (1979). Effect of distance constraints on macromolecular conformation. II. Simulation of experimental results and theoretical predictions. Biopolymers 18, 73-81.
3. Mirny, L & Domany, E. (1996). Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins 26, 391 -410.
4. Havel, T.F. & Wiithrich, K. (1985). An evaluation of the combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry for the determination of protein conformation in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 182, 281-294.
5. Brunger, A.T., Clore, G.M., Gronenborn, A.M. & Karplus, M. (1986). Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 83, 3801-3805.
6. Bohr, J., et al., & Petersen, E.F. (1993). Protein structures from distance inequalities. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 861-869.
7. Nilges, M. (1995). Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulfide connectivities. J. Mol. Biol. 245, 645-650.
8. Lund, O., Hansen, J., Brunak, S. & Bohr, J. (1996). Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints. Protein Sci. 5, 2217-2225.
9. Aszódi, A. & Taylor, W R. (1996). Homology modelling by distance geometry. Fold. Des. 1, 325-334.
10. Mumenthaler, C. & Braun, W. (1996). Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 465-480.
11. Skolnick, J., Kolinski, A. & Ortiz, A.R. (1997). MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 265, 217-241.
12. Grippen, G. & Havel, T.F. (1988). Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation. Wiley, New York.
13. Kuntz, I.D., Thomason, J.F. & Oshiro, C.M. (1989). Distance geometry. Methods Enzymol. 177, 159-204.
14. Scheek, R.M., Van Gunsteren, W.F. & Kaptein, R. (1989). Molecular dynamics simulation techniques fro determination of molecular structures from nuclear magnetic resonance data. Methods Enzymol. 177, 204-218.
15. Brünger, A.T., Adams, P.D. & Rice, U.M. (1997). New applications of simulated annealing in X-ray crystallography and solution NMR. Curr. Opin. Struct Biol. 5, 325-336.
16. Rosenbluth, M.N. & Rosenbluth, A.W. (1955). Monte Carlo calculation of the average extension of molecular chains. J. Chem. Phys. 23, 356-359.
17. Sali, A., Shakhnovich, E.I. & Karplus, M. (1994). Kinetics of protein folding. J Mol. Biol. 235, 1614-1636.
18. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. Jr, & Vecchi, M.P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671-680.
19. Abkevich, V.I., Gutin, A.M. & Shakhnovich, E.I. (1995). Impact of local and non-local interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 460-471.
20. Govindarajan, S. & Goldstein, R. (1995). Why are some protein structures so common? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3341-3345.
21. Anfinsen, C. & Scheraga, H. (1975). Experimental and theoretical aspects of protein folding. Adv. Protein Chem. 29; 205-300.
22. Vendruscolo, M. (1997). Modified configurational bias Monte Carlo for simulation of polymer systems. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2970-2976.
23. Kabsch, W. (1978). A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A 34, 827-828.
24. Kabsch, W. (1976). A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 922-923.
25. McLachlan, A.D. (1979). Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. J. Mol. Biol. 128, 49-79.
26. Cohen, F.E. & Sternberg, M.J. (1980). On the prediction of protein structure: the significance of the root-mean-square deviation. J. Mol. Biol. 163, 613-621.
27. Austin, R.H., Beeson, K.W., Eisenstein, L, Frauenfelder, H. & Gunsalus, I.C. (1975). Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. Biochemistry 14, 5355-5360.
28. Frauenfelder, H., Parak, F. & Young, R.D. (1988). Conformational substates in proteins. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17, 451-479.
29. Eiber, R. & Karplus, M. (1987). Multiple conformational states of proteins: Molecular dynamics of myoglobin. Science 235, 318-321.
30. Frauenfelder, H., Sugar, S. & Wolynes, P.G. (1991). The energy landscapes and motions in proteins. Science 254, 1598-1603.
31. Wüthrich, K. (1986). NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Wiley, New York..
32. Goldbart, P.M. & Zippelius, A. (1993). Amorphous solid state of vulcanized macromolecules: a variational approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2256-2259.
33. Castillo, H.E., Goldbart, P.M. & Zippelius, A. (1994). Distribution of localization lengths in randomly crosslinked macromolecular networks. Europhys. Lett. 28, 519-524.
34. Camacho, C.J. (1996). Entropie barriers, frustration and order: basic ingredients in protein folding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2324-2328.
35. Camacho, CJ. & Schanke, T. (1997)- From collapse to freezing in random heteropolymers. Europhys. Lett. 37, 603-608.
36. Gutin, A.M. & Shakhnovich, E.I. (1994). Statistical mechanics of polymers with distance constraints. J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5290-5293.
37. Bryngelson, J.D. & Thirumalai, D. Internal constraints induce localization in an isolated polymer molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 542-546.