The Effects of Simultaneous Prompting on Teaching Expressive Identification of Objects: An instructive feedback study

International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 149-167

  Tekin Iftar, Elif ^a   Acar, Gazi ^a   Kurt, Onur ^a  

^a ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345059981     PISSN: 1034912X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1034912032000089657     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BILLINGSLEY, F.F., WHITE, O.R., & MUNSON, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
2. DOGAN, O., & TEKIN-IFTAR, E. (2002). The effects of simultaneous prompting on teaching receptively identifying occupations from picture cards. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 237-252.
3. DOYLE, P.M., GAST, D.L., WOLERY, M., AULT, M.J., & FARMER, J.A. (1990). Use of constant time delay in small group instruction: A study of observational and incidental learning. Journal of Special Education, 23, 269-385.
4. DOYLE, P.M., GAST, D.L., WOLERY, M., AULT, M.J., & MEYER, S. (1992). Teaching dressing skills to students with moderate intellectual disability in small-group instructional arrangements. Exceptionality, 3, 233-253.
5. DOYLE, P.M., SCHUSTER, J.W., & MEYER, S. (1996). Embedding extra stimuli in the task direction: Effects on learning of students with moderate mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 381-399.
6. FETKO, K.S., SCHUSTER, J.W., HARLEY, D.A., & COLLINS, B.C. (1999). Using simultaneous prompting to teach a chained vocational task to young adults with severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 318-329.
7. FICKEL, K.M., SCHUSTER, J.W., & COLLINS, B.C. (1998). Teaching different tasks using different stimuli in a heterogeneous small group. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 219-244.
8. GAST, D.L., DOYLE, P.M., WOLERY, M., AULT, M.J., & BAKLARZ, J.L. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.
9. GIBSON, A.N., & SCHUSTER, J.W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247-267.
10. GRIFFEN, A.K., SCHUSTER, J.W., & MORSE, T.E. (1998). The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 42-61.
11. HOLCOMBE, M.A. (1991). Efficiency of instruction: Embedding future target behaviors in the consequent events for correct responses. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
12. JOHNSON, P., SCHUSTER, J.W., & BELL, J.K. (1996). Comparison of simultaneous prompting with and without error correction in teaching science vocabulary words to high school students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 437-458.
13. MACFARLAND-SMITH, J., SCHUSTER, J.W., & STEVENS, K.B. (1993). Using simultaneous prompting to teach expressive object identification to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 50-60.
14. MACIAG, K.G., SCHUSTER, J.W., COLLINS, B.C., & COOPER, J.T. (2000). Training adults with moderate and severe mental retardation in a vocational skill using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 306-316.
15. ONER, N. (1997). Turkiye'de kullanilan psikolojik testler [The psychological tests used in Turkey]. Istanbul, Turkey: Bogazici University Publications.
16. PARROTT, K.A., SCHUSTER, J.W., COLLINS, B.C., & GASSAWAY, L.J. (2000). Simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback when teaching chained tasks. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 3-19.
17. SCHUSTER, J.W., & GRIFFEN, A.K. (1993). Teaching a chained task with a simultaneous prompting procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 299-315.
18. SCHUSTER, J.W., GRIFFEN, A.K., & WOLERY, M. (1992). Comparison of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305-326.
19. SCHUSTER, J.W., MORSE, T.E., GRIFFEN, A.B., & WOLERY, T. (1996). Teaching peer reinforcement and grocery words: An investigation of observational learning and instructive feedback. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 511-533.
20. SEWELL, T.J., COLLINS, B.C., HEMMETER, M.L., & SCHUSTER, J.W. (1998). Using simultaneous prompting within an activity-based format to teach dressing skills to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 132-145.
21. SINGLETON, D.K., SCHUSTER, J.W., MORSE, T.E., & COLLINS, B.C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182-199.
22. SINGLETON, K.C., SCHUSTER, J.W., & AULT, M.J. (1995). Simultaneous prompting in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 218-230.
23. TAWNEY, J.W., & GAST, D.L. (1984). Single subject research design in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
24. TEKIN, E., & KIRCAALI-IFTAR, G. (2001). Özel e itimde yanlissiz ögretim yontemleri [Errorless learning procedures in special education]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publishing Company.
25. TEKIN, E., & KIRCAALI-IFTAR, G. (2002). Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two response prompting procedures delivered by sibling tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 283-299.
26. TEKIN-IFTAR, E. (2003). Effectiveness of peer delivered simultaneous prompting on teaching community signs to students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 77-94.
27. WALL, M.E., & GAST, D.L. (1999). Acquisition of incidental information during instruction for a response-chain skill. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 31-50.
28. WERTS, M.G., WOLERY, M., HOLCOMBE, A., & FREDERICK, C. (1993). Effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors, Exceptionality, 4, 81-95.
29. WERTS, M.G., WOLERY, M., HOLCOMBE, A., & GAST, D.L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
30. WERTS, M.G., WOLERY, M., HOLCOMBE-LIGON, A., VASSILAROS, M.A., & BILLINGS, S.S. (1992). Efficacy of transition-based teaching with instructive feedback. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 320-334.
31. WOLERY, M., AULT, M.J., & DOYLE, P.M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe handicaps: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longman.
32. WOLERY, M., BAILEY, D.B., & SUGAI, G.M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33. WOLERY, M., DOYLE, P.M., AULT, M.J., GAST, D.L., MEYER, S., & STINSON, D. (1991). Effects of presenting incidental information in consequent events on future learning. Journal of Behavioral Learning, 1, 79-104.
34. WOLERY, M., & GAST, D.L. (1990). Efficiency of instruction: Conceptual framework and research directions. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
35. WOLERY, M., HOLCOMBE, A., WERTS, M.G., & CIPOLLONE, R.M. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback. Early Education and Development, 4, 20-31.