The Acquisition of Instructive Feedback: A Comparison of Continuous Versus Intermittent Presentation Schedules

Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 42-61

  Griffen, Ann K ^a   Schuster, John W ^c   Morse, Timothy E ^b  

^a Fayette County Board of Education   (United States)

^b Baldwin County Board of Education   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010011591     PISSN: 10793917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Anthony, L., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Caldwell, N. K., & Snyder, E. D. (1996). Effects of daily probing on acquisition of instructive feedback responses. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 111-133.
2. Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.
3. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
4. Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199-206.
5. Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Farmer, J. A. (1990). Use of constant time delay in small group instruction: A study of observational and incidental learning. Journal of Special Education, 23, 369-385.
6. Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Baklarz, J. L. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.
7. Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Kolenda, J. L. (1994). Instructive feedback: Effects of number and type. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 313-334.
8. Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Morris, L. L., Doyle, P. M., & Meyer, S. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a group instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Exceptionality, 1, 81-96.
9. Gibson, A., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching word recognition to preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247-267.
10. Johnson, P., Schuster, J. W., & Bell, J. K. (1996). Comparison of simultaneous prompting with and without error correction in teaching science vocabulary words to high school students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 437-458.
11. MacFarland-Smith, J., Schuster, J. W., & Stevens, K. B. (1993). Using simultaneous prompting procedures to teach expressive object identification to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17(1), 1-10.
12. Schuster, J. W., Griffen, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Comparison of the simultaneous prompting procedure and constant time delay procedure in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305-325.
13. Shelton, B. S., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Winterling, V. (1991). The role of small group instruction in facilitating observational and incidental learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the School, 22, 123-133.
14. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instruction research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
15. Singleton, K. C., Schuster, J. W., & Ault, M. J. (1995). Simultaneous prompting in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 218-230.
16. Stinson, D. M., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Collins, B. C. (1991). Acquisition of nontargeted information during small-group instruction. Exceptionality, 2, 65-80.
17. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
18. Terman, L., & Merrill, M. (1973). Stanford-Binet intelligence scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
20. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Vassilaros, M. A., & Billings, S. S. (1992). Efficacy of transition-based teaching with instructive feedback. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 320-334.
21. Whalen, C., Schuster, J. W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (1996). The use of unrelated feedback when teaching in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 188-202.
22. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
23. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Mills, B. M. (1990). Use of choral and individual attentional responses with constant time delay when teaching sight word reading. Remedial and Special Education, 11(5), 47-58.
24. Wolery, M., Cybriwsky, C. A., Gast, D. L., Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Use of constant time delay and attentional responses with adolescents. Exceptional Children, 57, 462-474.
25. Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Kirk, K. & Schuster, J. W. (1988). Fading extra-stimulus prompts with autistic children using time delay. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 29-44.
26. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M. G., & Cipollone, R. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback. Early Education and Development, 4, 20-31.
27. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Holcombe, A., Billings, S. S., & Vassilaros, M. A. (1993). Comparison of simultaneous and alternating presentation of non-target information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 187-204.
28. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: he case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.