Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 87-105

  Baker, Richard H ^a,b,d   Wilkinson, Gerald S ^c   DeSalle, Rob ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diopsidae; Incongruence; Nuclear genes; Partitioned Bremer support; Saturation

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; ELONGATION FACTOR 1; EYE PROTEIN; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; ONCOPROTEIN; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA 16S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 12S; WHITE PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; WINGLESS PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FLY; GENE; GENETICS; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOMETRY; DIPTERA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDE ELONGATION FACTOR 1; PHYLOGENY; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0035527385     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150118679     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. ALLARD, M. W., J. S. FARRIS, AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1999. Congruence among mammalian mitochondrial genes. Cladistics 15:75-84.
2. BAKER, R. H., AND R. DESALLE. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:654-673.
3. BAKER, R. H., X. YU, AND R. DESALLE. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:427-436.
4. BAKER, R. H., AND G. S. WILKINSON. submitted. Phylogenetic analysis of eye stalk allometry and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (diopsidae).
5. BAUM, D. A., R. L. SMALL, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47:181-207.
6. BENNETT, C. L., AND M. FROMMER. 1997. The white gene of the tephritid fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni is characterized by a long untranslated 5′ leader and a 12 kb first intron. Insect Mol. Biol. 6:343-356.
7. BJORKLUND, M. 1999. Are third positions really that bad? A test using vertebrate cytochrome b. Cladistics 15:191-197.
8. BLOOMER, P., AND T. M. CROWE. 1998. Francolin phylogenetics: Molecular, morphobehavioral, and combined evidence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:236-254.
9. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
10. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
11. BROWER, A. V. Z. 1994. Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:159-174.
12. BROWER, A. V. Z., AND R. DESALLE. 1994. Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of a DNA sequence region in insect molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:702-716.
13. BROWN, W. M., E. M. PRAGER, A. WANG, AND A. C. WILSON. 1982. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: Tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 18:225-239.
14. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
15. BURKHARDT, D., AND I. DE LA MOTTE. 1985. Selective pressures, variability, and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Naturwissenschaften 72:204-206.
16. BURKHARDT, D., AND I. DE LA MOTTE. 1988. Big 'antlers' are favoured: Female choice in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Insecta), field collected harems and laboratory experiments. J. Comp. Physiol. A 162:649-652.
17. BURKHARDT, D., I. DE LA MOTTE, AND K. LUNAU. 1994. Signalling fitness: Larger males sire more off-spring. Studies of the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera). J. Comp. Physiol. A 174:61-64.
18. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, A. JANKE, S. PÄÄBO, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: Instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:519-527.
19. CARPENTER, J. M. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4:291-296.
20. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
21. CHO, S., A. MITCHELL, J. C. REGIER, C. MITTER, R. W. POOLE, T. P. FRIEDLANDER, AND S. ZHAO. 1995. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: Elongation factor-1α recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:650-656.
22. COLLINS, T. M., F. KRAUS, AND G. ESTABROOK. 1994. Compositional effects and weighting of nucleotide sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:449-459.
23. CUMMINGS, M. P., S. P. OTTO, AND J. WAKELEY. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:814-822.
24. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:733-740.
25. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an interactive procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-478.
26. DANFORTH, B. N., AND S. JI. 1998. Elongation factor-1α occurs as two copies in bees: Implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1α sequences in insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:225-235.
27. DAVIS, J. I., M. P. SIMMONS, D. W. STEVENSON, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1998. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analysis: An example from the monocotyledons using mitochondrial atp A sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:282-310.
28. DESALLE, R., AND A. V. Z. BROWER. 1997. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46:751-764.
29. DESALLE, R., T. FREEDMAN, E. M. PRAGER, AND A. C. WILSON. 1987. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26:157-164.
30. EERNISSE, D. J., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1170-1195.
31. FANG, Q. Q., S. CHO, J. C. REGIER, C. MITTER, M. MATTHEWS, R. W. POOLE, T. P. FRIEDLANDER, AND S. ZHOU. 1997. A new nuclear gene for insect phylogenetics: Dopa decarboxylase is informative of relationships within Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Syst. Biol. 46:269-283.
32. FARRIS, J. 1988. Hennig86, Program and documentation, version 1.5.
33. FARRIS, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
34. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
35. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
36. FEIJEN, H. R. 1983. Systematics and phylogeny of Centrioncidae, a new Afromontane family of Diptera (Schizophora). Zool. Verh. (Leiden) 202:1-137.
37. FEIJEN, H. R. 1984. A further contribution to the genus Diopsina Curran, 1928 (Diptera: Diopsidae). Rev. Zool. Afr. 98:9-34.
38. FEIJEN, H. R. 1989. Diopsidae. Pages 1-122 in Flies of the Nearctic Region (G. C. D. Griffiths, ed.). E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
39. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
40. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
41. FITCH, W. M., AND J. YE. 1991. Weighted parsimony: Does it work? Pages 147-155 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
42. FRIEDLANDER, T. P., K. R. HORST, J. C. REGIER, C. MITTER, R. S. PEIGLER, AND Q. Q. FANG. 1998. Two nuclear genes yield concordant relationships within Attacini (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:131-140.
43. FRIEDLANDER, T. P., J. C. REGIER, AND C. MITTER. 1994. Phylogenetic information content of five nuclear gene sequences in animals: Initial assessment of character sets from concordance and divergence studies. Syst. Biol. 43:511-525.
44. FRIEDLANDER, T. P., J. C. REGIER, C. MITTER, AND D. L. WAGNER. 1996. A nuclear gene for higher level phylogenetics: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase tracks Mesozoic-age divergences within lepidoptera (Insecta). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:594-604.
45. GATESY, J., R. DESALLE, AND W. C. WHEELER. 1994. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:152-157.
46. GATESY, J., C. HAYASHI, M. CRONIN, AND P. ARCTANDER. 1996. Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:954-963.
47. GIBSON, T., D. HIGGINS, AND J. THOMPSON. 1994. ClustalX. Program and documentation available at ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/mac/clustalw/clustalx/.
48. GIVNISH, T. J., AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1997. Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:320-330.
49. GOLOBOFF, P. A. 1991. Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. Cladistics 7:215-232.
50. GOLOBOFF, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9:83-91.
51. GRAYBEAL, A. 1994. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: A search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Syst. Biol. 43:174-193.
52. GRIMALDI, D., AND G. FENSTER. 1989. Evolution of extreme sexual dimorphisms: Structural and behavioral convergence among broad-headed Drosophilidae (Diptera). Am. Mus. Nov. 2939:1-25.
53. HELM-BYCHOWSKI, K., AND J. CRACRAFT. 1993. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: Relationships within the corvine assemblage (Class Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome-b gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1196-1214.
54. HENNIG, W. 1958. Die Familien der Diptera Schizophora und ihre phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen. Beitr. Entomol. 8:505-688.
55. HENNIG, W. 1965. Die Acalyptratae des Baltischen Bernsteins und ihre Bedeutung für die Erforschung der phylogenetischen Entwicklung dieser Dipteren-Gruppe. Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. 145:1-215.
56. HILLIS, D. M. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. Pages 278-295 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
57. HILLIS, D. M., AND M. T. DIXON. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:411-453.
58. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. L. SWOFFORD, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, J. J. BULL, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1994. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Biol. 43:288-291.
59. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., V. A. ALBERT, AND J. S. FARRIS. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic signal. Cladistics 8:275-287.
60. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., J. S. FARRIS, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8:275-287.
61. KLUGE, A. G. 1997. Testibility and the refutation and cor-roboration of cladistics hypotheses. Cladistics 13:81-96.
62. KNIGHT, A., AND D. P. MINDELL. 1993. Substitution bias, weighting of DNA sequence evolution, and the phylogenetic position of Fea's viper. Syst. Biol. 42:18-31.
63. KNIGHT, A., AND D. P. MINDELL. 1995. Weighting of nucleotide sequences: A reply. Syst. Biol. 44:112-116.
64. LORCH, P., G. S. WILKINSON, AND P. R. REILLO. 1993. Copulation duration and sperm precedence in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diptera: Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:303-311.
65. MARTIN, A. P., AND E. BERMINGHAM. 1998. Systematics and evolution of lower Central American cichlids inferred from analysis of cytochrome b gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:192-203.
66. MASON-GAMER, R. J., AND E. A. KELLOGG. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45:524-545.
67. MEIER, R., AND HILGER, S. (2000). On the egg morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Diopsidae (Diptera: Schizophora). J. Zool. Evol. Research 38:1-36.
68. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:351-370.
69. MILINKOVITCH, M. C., R. G. LEDUC, J. ADACHI, F. FARNIR, M. GEORGES, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in cetaceans. Genetics 144:1817-1833.
70. MILLER, J. S., A. V. Z. BROWER, AND R. DESALLE. 1997. Phylogeny of the neotropical moth tribe Josiini (Notodontidae: Dioptinae): Comparing and combining evidence from DNA sequences and morphology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:297-316.
71. MINDELL, D. P., A. KNIGHT, C. BAER, AND C. J. HUDDLESTON. 1996. Slow rates of molecular evolution in birds and the metabolic rate and body temperature hypotheses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:422-426.
72. MINDELL, D. P., AND C. E. THACKER. 1996. Rates of molecular evolution: Phylogenetic issues and applications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1996:279-303.
73. MIYAMOTO, M. M., M. W. ALLARD, R. M. ADKINS, L. L. JANECEK, AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1994. A congruence test of reliability using linked mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 43:236-249.
74. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
75. MOORE, W. S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
76. MURPHY, W. J., AND G. E. COLLIER. 1997. A molecular phylogeny for Aplocheiloid fishes (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): The role of vicariance and the origins of annualism. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:790-799.
77. NAYLOR, G. J. P., AND W. M. BROWN. 1998. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:61-76.
78. NIXON, K. C., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221-241.
79. O'GRADY, P. M., J. B. CLARK, AND M. G. KIDWELL. 1998. Phylogeny of the Drosophila sultans species group based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:656-664.
80. OLMSTEAD, R. G., P. A. REEVES, AND A. C. YEN. 1998. Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. Pages 164-187 in Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing (D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds.). Kluwer Press, Boston.
81. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.
82. PHILIPPE, H., G. LECOINTRE, H. L. V. LE, AND H. L. GUYANDER. 1996. A critical study of homology in molecular data with the use of a morphologically based cladogram, and its consequences for character weighting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1174-1186.
83. POE, S. 1996. Data set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Syst. Biol. 45:393-414.
84. PRESGRAVES, D. C., R. H. BAKER, AND G. S. WILKINSON. 1999. Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 266:1041-1047.
85. RAMOS-ONSINS, S., C. SEGARRA, J. ROZAZ, AND M. AGUADE. 1998. Molecular and chromosomal phylogeny in the Obscura group of Drosophila inferred from sequences of the rp49 gene region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:33-41.
86. REMSEN, J., AND R. DESALLE. 1998. Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:225-235.
87. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
88. RIJSEWIJK, E, M. SCHUERMANN, E. WAGENAAR, P. PARREN, D. WEIGEL, AND R. NUSSE. 1987. The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell 50:649-657.
89. RUSSO, C. A. M., N. TAKEZAKI, AND M. NEI. 1996. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:525-536.
90. SEGUY, E. 1955. Dipteres Diopsidae africains nouveaux ou peu connus. Bull. Inst. Franc. Afr. Noire A 17:1102-1124.
91. SHILLITO, J. F. 1950. A note on Speiser's genus Centrioncus and a revised definition of Diopsidae (Diptera: Acalypterae). Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London B 19:109-113.
92. SHILLITO, J. F. 1971. The genera of Diopsidae (Insecta: Diptera). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 50:287-295.
93. SIDDALL, M. E. 1995. Random Cladistics software package. Software available via ftp://zoo.toronto.edu/pub.
94. SIMON, C., F. FRATI, A. BECKENBACH, B. CRESPI, H. LIU, AND P. FLOOK. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
95. STEYSKAL, G. 1972. A catalogue of species and key to the genera of the family Diopsidae (Diptera: Acalypterate). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. Ser. A. 234:1-20.
96. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0. Sinapuer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
97. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. L. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Morowitz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
98. VOGLER, A. P., R. DESALLE, T. ASSMANN, C. B. KNISLEY, AND T. D. SCHULTZ. 1993. Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86:142-152.
99. WENZEL, J. W., AND M. E. SIDDALL. 1999. Noise. Cladistics 15:51-64.
100. WHEELER, W. C., AND D. S. GLADSTEIN. 1994. MALIGN: A multiple sequence alignment program. J. Hered. 85:417-118.
101. WILKINSON, G. S. 1993. Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62:213-222.
102. WILKINSON, G. S., AND G. N. DODSON. 1997. Function and evolution of antlers and eye-stalks in flies. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
103. WILKINSON, G. S., H. KAHLER, AND R. H. BAKER. 1998. Evolution of female mating preference in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9:525-533.
104. WILKINSON, G. S., AND P. R. REILLO. 1994. Female preference response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 255:1-6.
105. YANG, Z. 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.
106. YANG, Z. 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:125-133.