NuRD and SIN3: Histone deacetylase complexes in development

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 351-356

  Ahringer, Julie ^a  

^a WELLCOME CRC INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS RECEPTOR; HISTONE DEACETYLASE;

CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; DEACETYLATION; HEMATOPOIESIS; METHYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; HISTONE DEACETYLASES; HUMANS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RAS PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 0034254857     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02066-7     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Almouzni G.et al. Histone acetylation influences both gene expression and development of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 165:1994;654-669.
2. Kuo M.H., Allis C.D. Roles of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in gene regulation. BioEssays. 20:1998;615-626.
3. Giles R.H.et al. Conjunction dysfunction. CBP/p300 in human disease Trends Genet. 14:1998;178-183.
4. Zhang Y.et al. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell. 95:1998;279-289.
5. Zhang Y.et al. Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev. 13:1999;1924-1935.
6. Xue Y.et al. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol. Cell. 2:1998;851-861.
7. Wade P.A.et al. A multiple subunit Mi-2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;843-846.
8. Tong J.K.et al. Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex. Nature. 395:1998;917-921.
9. Ng H.H., Bird A. Histone deacetylases. silencers for hire Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;121-126.
10. Toh Y.et al. Analysis of the complete sequence of the novel metastasis-associated candidate gene, mta1, differentially expressed in mammary adenocarcinoma and breast cancer cell lines. Gene. 159:1995;97-104.
11. Solari F.et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans genes egl-27 and egr-1 are similar to MTA1, a member of a chromatin regulatory complex, and are redundantly required for embryonic patterning. Development. 126:1999;2483-2494.
12. Aasland R.et al. The SANT domain. a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:1996;87-88.
13. Hassig C.A.et al. Histone deacetylase activity is required for full transcriptional repression by mSin3A. Cell. 89:1997;341-347.
14. Laherty C.D.et al. Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate mad transcriptional repression. Cell. 89:1997;349-356.
15. Zhang Y.et al. Histone deacetylases and SAP18, a novel polypeptide, are components of a human Sin3 complex. Cell. 89:1997;357-364.
16. Laherty C.D.et al. SAP30, a component of the mSin3 corepressor complex involved in N-CoR-mediated repression by specific transcription factors. Mol. Cell. 2:1998;33-42.
17. Zhang Y.et al. SAP30, a novel protein conserved between human and yeast, is a component of a histone deacetylase complex. Mol. Cell. 1:1998;1021-1031.
18. Chen J.D., Evans R.M. A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature. 377:1995;454-457. [see comments].
19. Horlein A.J.et al. Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature. 377:1995;397-404. [see comments].
20. Heinzel T.et al. A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression. Nature. 387:1997;43-48. [see comments].
21. Nagy L.et al. Nuclear receptor repression mediated by a complex containing SMRT, mSin3A, and histone deacetylase. Cell. 89:1997;373-380.
22. Knoepfler P.S., Eisenman R.N. Sin meets NuRD and other tails of repression. Cell. 99:1999;447-450.
23. Ayer D.E. Histone deacetylases. transcriptional repression with SINers and NuRDs Trends Cell Biol. 9:1999;193-198.
24. Jones P.L.et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 19:1998;187-191.
25. Amir R.E.et al. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet. 23:1999;185-188.
26. Wade P.A.et al. Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation. Nat. Genet. 23:1999;62-66.
27. Pirrotta V. PcG complexes and chromatin silencing. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:1997;249-258.
28. Kehle J.et al. dMi-2, a hunchback-interacting protein that functions in polycomb repression. Science. 282:1998;1897-1900.
29. Sewalt R.G.et al. Characterization of interactions between the mammalian polycomb-group proteins Enx1/EZH2 and EED suggests the existence of different mammalian polycomb-group protein complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;3586-3595.
30. van Der Vlag J., Otte A.P. Transcriptional repression mediated by the human polycomb-group protein EED involves histone deacetylation. Nat. Genet. 23:1999;474-478.
31. Strouboulis J.et al. Transcriptional repression by XPc1, a new Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis embryos, is independent of histone deacetylase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1999;3958-3968.
32. Shao Z.et al. Stabilization of chromatin structure by PRC1, a Polycomb complex. Cell. 98:1999;37-46.
33. Montgomery M.K.et al. RNA as a target of double-stranded RNA-mediated genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;15502-15507.
34. Fire A.et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 391:1998;806-811.
35. Shi Y., Mello C. A CBP/p300 homolog specifies multiple differentiation pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 12:1998;943-955.
36. Herman M.A.et al. EGL-27 is similar to a metastasis-associated factor and controls cell polarity and cell migration in C. elegans. Development. 126:1999;1055-1064.
37. Ch'ng Q., Kenyon C. egl-27 generates anteroposterior patterns of cell fusion in C. elegans by regulating Hox gene expression and Hox protein function. Development. 126:1995;3303-3312.
38. Mannervik M., Levine M. The Rpd3 histone deacetylase is required for segmentation of the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;6797-6801.
39. Lu X., Horvitz H.R. lin-35 and lin-53, two genes that antagonize a C. elegans Ras pathway, encode proteins similar to Rb and its binding protein RbAp48. Cell. 95:1998;981-991.
40. Solari F., Ahringer J. NURD complex genes antagonise Ras induced vulval development in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 10:1992;223-226.
41. Tan P.B., Kim S.K. Signaling specificity. the RTK/RAS/MAP kinase pathway in metazoans Trends Genet. 15:1999;145-149.
42. Ferguson E.L., Horvitz R.H. The multivulva phenotype of certain Caenorhabditis elegans mutants results from defects in two functionally redundant pathways. Genetics. 123:1989;109-121.
43. Walhout A.J.et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development [In Process Citation]. Science. 287:2000;116-122.
44. Brehm A., Kouzarides T. Retinoblastoma protein meets chromatin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;142-145.
45. Brehm A.et al. Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature. 391:1998;597-601.
46. Eshed Y.et al. Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell. 99:1999;199-209.
47. Ogas J.et al. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;13839-13844.
48. Ogas J.et al. Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science. 277:1997;91-94.
49. Cortes M.et al. Control of lymphocyte development by the Ikaros gene family. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:1999;167-171.
50. Kim J.et al. Ikaros DNA-binding proteins direct formation of chromatin remodeling complexes in lymphocytes. Immunity. 10:1999;345-355.
51. Koipally J.et al. Repression by Ikaros and Aiolos is mediated through histone deacetylase complexes. EMBO J. 18:1999;3090-3100.
52. Xu L.et al. Coactivator and corepressor complexes in nuclear receptor function. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:1999;140-147.
53. Tsai C.C.et al. SMRTER, a Drosophila nuclear receptor coregulator, reveals that EcR-mediated repression is critical for development. Mol. Cell. 4:1999;175-186.
54. Yao T.P.et al. Drosophila ultraspiracle modulates ecdysone receptor function via heterodimer formation. Cell. 71:1992;63-72.
55. Bender M.et al. Drosophila ecdysone receptor mutations reveal functional differences among receptor isoforms. Cell. 91:1997;777-788.
56. Pennetta G., Pauli D. The Drosophila Sin3 gene encodes a widely distributed transcription factor essential for embryonic viability. Dev. Genes Evol. 208:1998;531-536.
57. Neufeld T.P.et al. A genetic screen to identify components of the sina signaling pathway in Drosophila eye development. Genetics. 148:1998;277-286.
58. Lin R.J.et al. Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 391:1998;811-814.
59. Miska E.A.et al. HDAC4 deacetylase associates with and represses the MEF2 transcription factor. EMBO J. 18:1999;5099-5107.
60. Wang A.H.et al. HDAC4, a human histone deacetylase related to yeast HDA1, is a transcriptional corepressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1999;7816-7827.
61. Chen G.et al. A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor groucho in Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2218-2230.
62. Bienz M., Muller J. Transcriptional silencing of homeotic genes in Drosophila. BioEssays. 17:1995;775-784.