Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy

Psychological Methods

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 241-301

  Nickerson, Raymond S ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034203345     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241     Document Type: Article

References (375)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Abelson, R. P. (1997a). On the surprising longevity of flogged horses: Why there is a case for the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 12-15.
3. Abelson, R. P. (1997b). A retrospective on the significance test ban of 1999 (if there were no significance tests, they would be invented). In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 117-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
6. Asher, W. (1993). The role of statistics in research. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 388-393.
7. Atkinson, D. R., Furlong, M. J., & Wampold, B. E. (1982). Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and scientific process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 189-194.
8. Bailer, J. C., & Mosteller, F. (1988). Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine, 108, 266-273.
9. Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
10. Bar-Hillel, M. A. (1974). Similarity and probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 277-282.
11. Bar-Hillel, M. A., & Falk, R. (1982). Some teasers concerning conditional probabilities. Cognition, 11, 109-122.
12. Baril, G. L., & Cannon, J. T. (1995). What is the probability that null hypothesis testing is meaningless? American Psychologist, 50, 1098-1099.
13. Bartko, J. J. (1991). Proving the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 46, 1089.
14. Beauchamp, K. L., & May, R. B. (1964). Replication report: Interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Psychological Reports, 14, 272.
15. Berger, J. O., & Berry, D. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76, 159-165.
16. Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of P values and evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 112-122.
17. Berkson, J. (1938). Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33, 526-542.
18. Berkson, J. (1942). Tests of significance considered as evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 37, 325-335.
19. Bernado, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994). Bayesian theory. New York: Wiley.
20. Bhattacharyya, G. K., & Johnson, R. A. (1977). Statistical concepts and methods. New York: Wiley.
21. Binder, A. (1963). Further considerations on testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review, 70, 107-115.
22. Birnbaum, I. (1982). Interpreting statistical significance. Teaching Statistics, 4, 24-26.
23. Blaich, C. F. (1998). The null-hypothesis significance test procedure: Can't live with it, can't live without it. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 194-195.
24. Bohrer, R. (1979). Multiple three-decision rules for parametric signs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 432-431.
25. Bolles, R. C. (1962). The difference between statistical hypotheses and scientific hypotheses. Psychological Reports, 11, 639-645.
26. Bolles, R. C., & Messick, S. (1958). Statistical utility in experimental inference. Psychological Reports, 4, 223-227.
27. Bookstein, F. L. (1998). Statistical significance testing was not meant for weak corroboration of weaker theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 195-196.
28. Borowski, E. J., & Borwein, J. M. (1991). The Harper Collins dictionary of mathematics. New York: Harper Collins.
29. Bracey, G. W. (1991). Sense, non-sense, and statistics. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 335.
30. Braver, S. L. (1975). On splitting the tails unequally: A new perspective on one versus two-tailed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 283-301.
31. Brewer, J. K. (1985). Behavioral statistics textbooks: Source of myths and misconceptions? Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 252-268.
32. Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. C. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
33. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
34. Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
35. Cassells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Graboys, T. B. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. The New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 999-1001.
36. Chase, L. J., & Tucker, R. K. (1976). Statistical power: Derivation, development, and data-analytic implications. Psychological Record, 26, 473-486.
37. Chow, S. L. (1987). Experimental psychology: Rationale, procedures and issues. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig Enterprises.
38. Chow, S. L. (1988). Significance test or effect size? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 105-110.
39. Chow, S. L. (1989). Significance tests and deduction: Reply to Folger (1989). Psychological Bulletin, 106, 161-165.
40. Chow, S. L. (1991). Some reservations about power analysis. American Psychologist, 46, 1088-1089.
41. Chow, S. L. (1996). Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Chow, S. L. (1998a). Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 169-239.
43. Chow, S. L. (1998b). What statistical significance means. Theory and Psychology, 8, 323-330.
44. Clark, C. A. (1963). Hypothesis testing in relation to statistical methodology. Review of Educational Research, 33, 455-473.
45. Clark, H. H. (1976). Reply to Wike and Church. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 257-261.
46. Clark-Carter, D. (1997). The account taken of statistical power in research published in the British Journal of Psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 71-83.
47. Cliff, N. (1993). Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 494-509.
48. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 145-153.
49. Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95-121). New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
51. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
53. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
54. Cohen, J. (1995). The earth is round (p < .05): Rejoinder. American Psychologist, 50, 1103.
55. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Coleman, E. B. (1964). Generalizing to a language population. Psychological Reports, 14, 219-226.
57. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
58. Cooper, H. M. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131-146.
59. Cooper, H. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 442-449.
60. Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
61. Cowles, M., & Davis, C. (1982). On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance. American Psychologist, 37, 553-558.
62. Cox, D. R. (1958). Some problems connected with statistical inference. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 357-372.
63. Cox, D. R. (1977). The role of significance tests. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 4, 49-70.
64. Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
65. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
66. Crow, E. L. (1991). Response to Rosenthal's comment "How are we doing in soft psychology?" American Psychologist, 46, 1083.
67. Dar, R. (1987). Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 145-151.
68. Dar, R. (1998). Null hypothesis tests and theory corroboration: Defending NHTP out of context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 196-197.
69. Dar, R., Serlin, R. C., & Omer, H. (1994). Misuse of statistical tests in three decades of psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 75-82.
70. Darlington, R. B., & Carlson, P. M. (1987). Behavioral statistics: Logic and methods. New York: Free Press.
71. Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
72. Dawes, R. M., Mirels, H. L., Gold, E., & Donahue, E. (1993). Equating inverse probabilities in implicit personality judgments. Psychological Science, 4, 396-400.
73. DeGroot, M. H. (1973). Doing what comes naturally: Interpreting a tail area as a posterior probability or as a likelihood ratio. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 966-969.
74. DeGroot, M. H. (1982). Comment [on Shafer, 1982]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 336-339.
75. Dickey, J. M. (1973). Scientific reporting and personal probabilities: Student's hypothesis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 285-305.
76. Dickey, J. M. (1977). Is the tail area useful as an approximate Bayes factor? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 138-142.
77. Dixon, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 390-396.
78. Dracup, C. (1995). Hypothesis testing - What it really is. The Psychologist, 8, 359-362.
79. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
80. Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Eddy, D. M., Hasselblad, V., & Shachter, R. (1992). Metaanalysis by the confidence profile method: The statistical synthesis of evidence. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
82. Edgington, E. S. (1966). Statistical inference and nonrandom samples. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 485-487.
83. Edgington, E. S. (1995). Randomization tests (3rd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
84. Edwards, W. (1965). Tactical note on the relation between scientific and statistical hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 400-402.
85. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
86. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
87. Elifson, K. W., Runyon, R. P., & Haber, A. (1990). Fundamentals of social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
88. English, H. B., & English, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic terms. New York: David McKay.
89. Erwin, E. (1997). Philosophy and psychotherapy: Razing the troubles of the brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Erwin, E. (1998). The logic of null hypothesis testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 197-198.
91. Estes, W. K. (1997a). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 330-341.
92. Estes, W. K. (1997b). Significance testing in psychological research: Some persisting issues. Psychological Science, 8, 18-19.
93. Evans, J. D. (1985). Invitation to psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
94. Eysenck, H. J. (1960). The concept of statistical significance and the controversy about one-tailed tests. Psychological Review, 67, 269-271.
95. Falk, R. (1986). Misconceptions of statistical significance. Journal of Structural Learning, 9, 83-96.
96. Falk, R. (1992). A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners. Cognition, 43, 197-223.
97. Falk, R. (1998a). In criticism of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 53, 798-799.
98. Falk, R. (1998b). Replication - A step in the right direction. Theory and Psychology, 8, 313-321.
99. Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: The amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory and Psychology, 5, 75-98.
100. Feinberg, W. E. (1971). Teaching Type-I and Type-II errors: The judicial process. The American Statistician, 25, 30-32.
101. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
102. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. New York: Hafner.
103. Fisher, R. A. (1956). Mathematics of a lady tasting tea. In J. R. Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics (pp. 1512-1521). New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1935)
104. Fisher, R. A. (1990). Statistical methods and scientific inference. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1956)
105. Fleiss, J. L. (1969). Estimating the magnitude of experimental effects. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 273-276.
106. Folger, R. (1989). Significance tests and the duplicity of binary decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 155-160.
107. Fowler, R. L. (1985). Testing for substantive significance in applied research by specifying nonzero effect null hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 215-218.
108. Freiman, J. A., Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Jr., & Kuebler, R. R. (1978). The importance of beta, the Type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 690-694.
109. Freund, J. E. (1962). Mathematical statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
110. Frick, R. W. (1995a). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23, 132-138.
111. Frick, R. W. (1995b). A problem with confidence intervals. American Psychologist, 50, 1102-1103.
112. Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
113. Frick, R. W. (1998). A better stopping rule of conventional statistical tests. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 690-697.
114. Friedman, H. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 245-251.
115. Gallo, P. S., Jr. (1978). Meta-analysis: A mixed meta-phor? American Psychologist, 33, 515-517.
116. Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than p values: Estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746-750.
117. Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W., & Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationalism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review, 63, 149-159.
118. Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
119. Gibbons, J. D., & Pratt, J. W. (1975). P-values: Interpretation and methodology. American Statistician, 29, 20-25.
120. Giere, R. N. (1972). The significance test controversy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 23, 170-181.
121. Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The Superego, the Ego, and the Id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
122. Gigerenzer, G. (1998a). Surrogates for theories. Theory and Psychology, 8, 195-204.
123. Gigerenzer, G. (1998b). We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 199-200.
124. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counseling for low-risk clients. AIDS Care, 10, 197-211.
125. Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
126. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
127. Gillman, L. (1992). The car and the goats. American Mathematical Monthly, 99, 3-7.
128. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
129. Glass, G. V., & Kliegl, R. M. (1983). An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 28-41.
130. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
131. Gold, D. (1969). Statistical tests and substantive significance. The American Sociologist, 4, 42-46.
132. Gonzalez, R. (1994). The statistics ritual in psychological research. Psychological Science, 5, 321, 325-328.
133. Good, I. J. (1950). Probability and the weighing of evidence. New York: Hafner.
134. Good, I. J. (1956). Discussion of paper by G. Spencer Brown. In Colin Cherry (Ed.), Information theory: Third London Symposium (pp. 13-14). London: Butterworth.
135. Good, I. J. (1981). Some logic and history of hypothesis testing. In J. Pitt (Ed.), Philosophy in economics (pp. 149-174). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
136. Good, I. J. (1982). Comment [on Shafer, 1982]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 342-344.
137. Good, I. J. (1983a). The Bayesian influence, or how to sweep subjectivism under the carpet. In I. J. Good, Good thinking: The foundations of probability and its applications (pp. 22-55). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1976)
138. Good, I. J. (1983b). Some logic and history of hypothesis testing. In I. J. Good, Good thinking: The foundations of probability and its applications (pp. 129-148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1981)
139. Good, I. J. (1983c). Which comes first, probability or statistics. In I. J. Good, Good thinking: The foundations of probability and its applications (pp. 59-62). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1956)
140. Good, R. & Fletcher, H. J. (1981). Reporting explained variance. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 18, 1-7.
141. Gorsuch, R. L. (1991). Things learned from another perspective (so far). American Psychologist, 46, 1089-1090.
142. Granaas, M. M. (1998). Model fitting: A better approach. American Psychologist, 53, 800-801.
143. Grant, D. A. (1962). Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review, 69, 54-61.
144. Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-20.
145. Greenwald, A. G. (1993). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. In G. Kerens & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Volume 1. Methodological issues (pp. 419-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Greenwald, A. G., Gonzalez, R., Harris, R. J., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and p-values: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
147. Greenwood, J. A. (1938). An empirical investigation of some sampling problems. Journal of Parapsychology, 2, 222-230.
148. Guttman, L. (1977). What is not what in statistics. The Statistician, 26, 81-107.
149. Guttman, L. (1981). Efficacy coefficients for differences among averages. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why (pp. 1-10). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
150. Guttman, L. (1985). The illogic of statistical inference for cumulative science. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 1, 3-10.
151. Hacking, I. (1965). Logic of scientific inference. London: Cambridge University Press.
152. Hagen, R. L. (1997). In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 52, 15-24.
153. Hagen, R. L. (1998). A further look at wrong reasons to abandon statistical testing. American Psychologist, 53, 801-803.
154. Harcum, E. T. (1990). Methodological vs. empirical literature: Two views on casual acceptance of the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 45, 404-405.
155. Harlow, L. L. (1997). Significance testing introduction and overview. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 1-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
156. Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
157. Harris, M. J. (1991). Significance tests are not enough: The role of effect-size estimation in theory corroboration. Theory and Psychology, 1, 375-382.
158. Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediaton of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363-386.
159. Harris, R. J. (1994). An analysis of variance primer. Itasca, IL: R. E. Peacock.
160. Harris, R. J. (1997a). Reforming significance testing via three-valued logic. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
161. Harris, R. J. (1997b). Significance tests have their place. Psychological Science, 8, 8-11.
162. Harris, R. J., & Quade, D. (1992). The minimally important difference significant criterion for sample size. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 27-49.
163. Hauck, W. W., & Anderson, S. (1986). A proposal for interpreting and reporting negative studies. Statistics in Medicine, 5, 203-209.
164. Hayes, A. F. (1998). Reconnecting data analysis and research design: Who needs a confidence interval? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 203-204.
165. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
166. Hayter, A. J. (1986). The maximum familywise error rate of Fisher's least significant difference test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 1000-1004.
167. Hebb, D. O. (1966). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
168. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
169. Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science: The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42, 443-455.
170. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1980). Vote counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359-369.
171. Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366-378.
172. Hodges, J., & Lehmann, E. (1954). Testing the approximate validity of statistical hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 16, 261-268.
173. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
174. Hubbard, R. (1995). The earth is highly significantly round (p < .0001). American Psychologist, 50, 1098.
175. Hubbard, R., Parsa, A. R., & Luthy, M. R. (1997). The spread of statistical significance testing in psychology: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Theory and Psychology, 7, 545-554.
176. Huberty, C. J. (1993). Historical origins of statistical testing practices: The treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317-333.
177. Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1988). A single contrast test procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 567-578.
178. Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. G., Jr. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row.
179. Humphreys, L. G. (1980). The statistics of failure to replicate: A comment on Buriel's (1978) conclusions. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 71-75.
180. Hunter, J. E. (1997). Need: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3-7.
181. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analvsis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
182. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
183. Hurlburt, R. T. (1994). Comprehending behavioral statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
184. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.
185. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
186. James, G., & James, R. C. (1959). Mathematics dictionary. New York: Van Nostrand.
187. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (First edition published 1937)
188. Johnstone, D. J. (1986). Tests of significance in theory and practice. The Statistician, 35, 491-504.
189. Jones, L. V. (1955). Statistics and research design. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 405-430.
190. Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Culhane, S. E. (1995). Continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 433-465.
191. Kac, M. (1964). Probability. Scientific American, 211(3), 92-108.
192. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
193. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). Directional statistical decisions. Psychological Review, 67, 160-167.
194. Kalbfleisch, J. G., & Sprott, D. A. (1976). On tests of significance. In W. L. Harper & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science (Vol. 2, pp. 259-272). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
195. Katzer, J., & Sodt, J. (1973). An analysis of the use of statistical testing in communication research. Journal of Communication, 23, 251-265.
196. Kendall, M. G., & Buckland, W. R. (1957). A dictionary of statistical terms. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
197. Kirk, R. E. (Ed.). (1972). Statistical issues. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
198. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
199. Kish, L. (1959). Some statistical problems in research design. American Sociological Review, 24, 328-338.
200. Knight, G. P., Fabes, R. A., & Higgins, D. A. (1996). Concerns about drawing causal inferences from meta-analysis: An example in the study of gender differences in aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 410-421.
201. Kraemer, H. C., & Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
202. Kupfersmid, J., & Fiala, M. (1991). A survey of attitudes and behaviors of authors who publish in psychology and education journals. American Psychologist, 46, 249-250.
203. Labovitz, S. (1968). Criteria for selecting a significance level: A note on the sacredness of .05. American Sociologist, 3, 200-222.
204. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of scientific knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
205. Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worral & G. Curie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programs: Imre Lakatos' philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
206. Lane, D. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1978). Estimating effect size: Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial decisions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 107-112.
207. Lashley, B. R., & Bond, C. F., Jr. (1997). Significance testing for round robin data. Psychological Methods, 2, 278-291.
208. Lepper, M. (1995). Theory by the number? Some concerns about meta-analysis as a theoretical tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 411-422.
209. Levin, J. R. (1993). Statistical significance testing from three perspectives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 378-382.
210. Leviton, L. C., & Cook, T. D. (1981). What differentiates meta-analysis from other forms of review? Journal of Personality, 49, 231-236.
211. Levy, P. (1967). Substantive significance of significant differences between two groups. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 37-40.
212. Lewandowsky, S., & Maybery, M. (1998). The critics rebutted: A Pyrrhic victory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 210-211.
213. Lewis, C. (1993). Bayesian methods for the analysis of variance. In G. Kerens & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Volume 2. Statistical issues (pp. 233-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
214. Lindgren, B. W. (1976). Statistical theory (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
215. Lindley, D. V. (1957). A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44, 187-192.
216. Lindley, D. V. (1977). A problem in forensic science. Biometrika, 64, 207-213.
217. Lindley, D. V. (1982). Comment [on Shafer, 1982]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 334-336.
218. Lindley, D. V. (1984). A Bayesian lady tasting tea. In H. A. David & H. T. David (Eds.), Statistics: An appraisal (pp. 455-485). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
219. Lindley, D. V. (1993). The analysis of experimental data: The appreciation of tea and wine. Teaching Statistics, 15, 22-25.
220. Lindquist, E. F. (1940). Sampling in educational research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 561-574.
221. Lindsay, R. M., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. American Statistician, 47, 217-228.
222. Loftus, G. R. (1991). On the tyranny of hypothesis testing in the social sciences. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 102-105.
223. Loftus, G. R. (1993). Editorial comment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 1-3.
224. Loftus, G. R. (1995). Data analysis as insight. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 57-59.
225. Loftus, G. R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 161-171.
226. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
227. Lunt, P. K., & Livingstone, S. M. (1989). Psychology and statistics: Testing the opposite of the idea you first thought of. The Psychologist, 2, 528-531.
228. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.
229. Macdonald, R. R. (1997). On statistical testing in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 333-347.
230. Maher, B. (1998). When the coefficient hits the clinic: Effect size and the size of the effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 211.
231. Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
232. Malgady, R. G. (1996). The question of cultural bias in assessment and diagnosis of ethnic minority clients: Let's reject the null hypothesis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 73-77.
233. Malgady, R. G. (1998). In praise of value judgments in null hypothesis testing . . . and of "accepting" the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 53, 797-798.
234. Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cognition: A theory of judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
235. Maxwell, S. E., Camp, C. J., & Arvey, R. D. (1981). Measures of strength of association: A comparative examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 525-534.
236. McDonald, R. P. (1997). Goodness of approximation in the linear model. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 199-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
237. McGrath, R. E. (1998). Significance testing: Is there something better? American Psychologist, 53, 796-797.
238. McGraw, K. O. (1991). Problems with BESD: A comment on Rosenthal's "How are we doing in soft psychology?" American Psychologist, 46, 1084-1086.
239. McGraw, K. O. (1995). Determining false alarm rates in null hypothesis testing research. American Psychologist, 50, 1099-1100.
240. McMan, J. C. (1995, August). Statistical significance testing fantasies in introductory psychology textbooks. Paper presented at the 103rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.
241. McNemar, Q. (1960). At random: Sense and nonsense. American Psychologist, 15, 295-300.
242. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and in physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
243. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular-asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
244. Meehl, P. E. (1990a). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 108-141.
245. Meehl, P. E. (1990b). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195-244.
246. Meehl, P. E. (1991). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. In R. E. Snow & D. E. Wilet (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science (pp. 13-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
247. Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 391-423). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
248. Melton, A. W. (1962). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 553-557.
249. Minturn, E. B., Lansky, L. M., & Dember, W. N. (1972). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychologists: A replication and extension. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.
250. Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The significance test controversy: A reader. Chicago: Aldine.
251. Mulaik, S. A., Raju, N. S., & Harshman, R. A. (1997). There is a time and place for significance testing. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
252. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
253. Murphy, K. R. (1990). If the null hypothesis is impossible, why test it? American Psychologist, 45, 403-404.
254. Murphy, K. R. (1997). Editorial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 3-5.
255. Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 79-95.
256. Nelson, N., Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1986). Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological research. American Psychologist, 41, 1299-1301.
257. Neuliep, J. W., & Crandall, R. (1990). Editorial bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 85-90.
258. Neuliep, J. W., & Crandall, R. (1993). Reviewer bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 22-29.
259. Neyman, J. (1942). Basic ideas and theory of testing statistical hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 105, 292-327.
260. Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928a). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20A, 175-240.
261. Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928b). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part II. Biometrika, 20A, 263-294.
262. Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933a). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical inference. Biometrika, 20A, 175-240, 263-294.
263. Nickerson, R. S. (1996). Ambiguities and unstated assumptions in probabilistic reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 410-433.
264. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Statistical significance testing: Useful tool or bone-headedly misguided procedure? The debate continues. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 455-471.
265. Nosanchuk, T. A. (1978). Serendipity tails: A note on two-tailed hypothesis tests with asymmetric regions of rejection. Acta Sociologica, 21, 249-253.
266. Nunnally, J. (1960). The place of statistics in psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 641-650.
267. Nunnally, J. (1975). Introduction to statistics for psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
268. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
269. Palm, G. (1998). Significance testing - Does it need this defence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 214-215.
270. Parker, S. (1995). The "difference of means" may not be the "effect size." American Psychologist, 50, 1101-1102.
271. Pauker, S. P., & Pauker, S. G. (1979). The amniocentesis decision: An explicit guide for parents. In C. J. Epstein, C. J. R. Curry, S. Packman, S. Sherman, & B. D. Hall (Eds.), Birth defects: Original article series: Volume 15. Risk, communication, and decision making in genetic counseling (pp. 289-324). New York: The National Foundation.
272. Pearce, S. C. (1992). Introduction to Fisher (1925): Statistical methods for research workers. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Breakthroughs in statistics: Volume 2. Methodology and distributions (pp. 59-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
273. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
274. Peirce, C. S. (1956). The probability of induction. In J. R. Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 1341-1354). New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1878)
275. Pollard, P. (1993). How significant is "significance"? In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
276. Pollard, P., & Richardson, J. T. E. (1987). On the probability of making Type I errors. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 159-163.
277. Polya, G. (1954a). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Vol. 1. Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
278. Polya, G. (1954b). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Vol. 2. Patterns of plausible Inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
279. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
280. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160-164.
281. Pruzek, R. M. (1997). An introduction to Bayesian inference and its application. In. L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. J. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 287-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
282. Reaves, C. C. (1992). Quantitative research for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
283. Reichardt, C. S., & Gollob, H. F. (1997). When confidence intervals should be used instead of statistical tests, and vice versa. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 259-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
284. Revlis, R. (1975). Syllogistic reasoning: Logical decisions from a complex data base. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process. New York: Wiley.
285. Rindskopf, D. M. (1997). Testing "small," not null, hypotheses: Classical and Bayesian approaches. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 319-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
286. Robbins, H. E. (1952). Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 527-535.
287. Robert, C. P. (1994). The Bayesian choice: A decision-theoretic motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
288. Robinson, D., & Levin, J. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 21-26.
289. Rogers, J. L., Howard, K. I., & Vessey, J. T. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 553-565.
290. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
291. Rosenthal, R. (1983). Assessing the statistical and social importance of the effects of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 4-13.
292. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
293. Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist, 45, 775-777.
294. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Effect sizes: Pearson's correlation, its display via the BESD, and alternative indices. American Psychologist, 46, 1086-1087.
295. Rosenthal, R. (1993). Cumulating evidence. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook of data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 519-559). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
296. Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38.
297. Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1964). Further evidence for the cliff effect in the interpretation of levels of significance. Psychological Reports, 15, 570.
298. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1979). A note on percent variance explained as a measure of the importance of effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 395-396.
299. Rosenthal R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
300. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989b). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
301. Rossi, J. S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 646-656.
302. Rossi, J. S. (1997). A case study in the failure of psychology as a cumulative science: The spontaneous recovery of verbal learning. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 175-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
303. Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 149-158.
304. Rouanet, H. (1998). Significance testing in a Bayesian framework: Assessing direction of effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 217-218.
305. Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
306. Rozeboom, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335-391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
307. Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34-58.
308. Scarr, S. (1997). Rules of evidence: A larger context for the statistical debate. Psychological Science, 8, 16-20.
309. Schafer, W. D. (1993). Interpreting statistical significance and nonsignificance. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 383-387.
310. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
311. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
312. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What If there were no significance tests? (pp. 37-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
313. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. E. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
314. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
315. Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
316. Selvin, H. (1957). A critique of tests of significance in survey research. American Sociological Review, 22, 519-527.
317. Serlin, R. C. (1993). Confidence intervals and the scientific method: A case for Holm on the range. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 350-360.
318. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73-83.
319. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1993). Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good-enough principle. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 199-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
320. Shafer, G. (1982). Lindley's paradox. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 325-334.
321. Shaffer, J. P. (1972). Directional statistical hypotheses and comparisons between means. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 195-197.
322. Shaffer, J. P. (1979). Comparison of means: An F test followed by a modified multiple range procedure. Journal of Educational Statistics, 81, 826-831.
323. Shapiro, S. (1997). Is meta-analysis a valid approach to the evaluation of small effects in observational studies? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 223-229.
324. Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1994). Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
325. Shaver, J. P. (1985). Chance and nonsense: A conversation about interpreting tests of statistical significance. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 57-60, 138-141.
326. Shaver, J. P. (1991). Quantitative reviewing of research. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 83-95). New York: Macmillan.
327. Shaver, J. P. (1993). What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 293-316.
328. Shrout, P. E. (1997). Should significance tests be banned? Introduction to a special section exploring the pros and cons. Psychological Science, 8, 1-2.
329. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.
330. Signorelli, A. (1974). Statistics: Tool or master of the psychologist? American Psychologist, 29, 774-777.
331. Skipper, J. K., Jr., Guenther, A. L., & Nass, B. (1967). The sacredness of .05: A note concerning the uses of statistical levels of significance in social science. American Sociologist, 2, 16-18.
332. Snow, P. (1998). Inductive strategy and statistical tactics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 219.
333. Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
334. Sohn, D. (1996). Meta-analysis and science. Theory and Psychology, 6, 229-246.
335. Sohn, D. (1998a). Statistical significance and replicability: Response to Chow's and Falk's commentary. Theory and Psychology, 8, 331-334.
336. Sohn, D. (1998b). Statistical significance and replicability: Why the former does not presage the latter. Theory and Psychology, 8, 291-311.
337. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
338. Steiger, J. H., & Fouladi, R. T. (1997). Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical models. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 221-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
339. Sterling, T. D. (1959). Publications and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance - Or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54, 30-34.
340. Stevens, S. S. (1968). Measurement, statistics, and the schemapiric view. Science, 161, 849-856.
341. Stocks, J. T. (1987). Estimating proportion of explained variance for selected analysis of variance designs. Journal of Social Service Research, 11, 77-91.
342. Strahan, R. F. (1991). Remarks on the binomial effect size display. American Psychologist, 46, 1083-1084.
343. Svyantek, D. J., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1995). The earth is round (so we can get there from here). American Psychologist, 50, 1101.
344. Tatsuoka, M. (1993). Effect size. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Volume 1. Methodological issues (pp. 461-479). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
345. Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361-377.
346. Thompson, B. (1994a). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.
347. Thompson, B. (1994b). The pivotal role of replication in psychological research: Empirically evaluating the replicability of sample results. Journal of Personality, 62, 157-176.
348. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
349. Thompson, B. (1997). Editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: Further comments. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 29-32.
350. Thompson, B. (1998). In praise of brilliance: Where that praise really belongs. American Psychologist, 53, 799-800.
351. Thompson, B., & Snyder, P. A. (1997). Statistical significance testing practices in the Journal of Experimental Education. Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 75-83.
352. Thompson, B., & Snyder, P. A. (1998). Statistical significance and reliability analyses in recent JCD research articles. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 436-441.
353. Tryon, W. W. (1998). The inscrutable null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 53, 796.
354. Tukey, J. W. (1969). Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work? American Psychologist, 24, 83-91.
355. Tukey, J. W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science, 6, 100-116.
356. Tyler, R. W. (1931). What is statistical significance? Educational Research Bulletin, 10, 115-118, 142.
357. Upton, G. J. G. (1992). Fisher's exact test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 155, 395-402.
358. Wald, A. (1945). Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 16, 117-186.
359. Wald, A. (1974). Sequential analysis. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1947)
360. Wang, C. (1993). Sense and nonsense of statistical inference. New York: Marcel Dekker.
361. Westlake, W. J. (1988). Bioavailability and bioequivalence of pharmaceutical formulations. In K. E. Peace (Ed.), Biopharmaceutical statistics for drug development (pp. 329-352). New York: Marcel Dekker.
362. Wickens, C. D. (1998). Commonsense statistics. Ergonomics in Design, 6(4), 18-22.
363. Wickens T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency table analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
364. Wilkinson, B. (1951). A statistical consideration in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 156-158.
365. Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
366. Wilson, G. T., & Rachman, S. J. (1983). Meta-analysis and the evaluation of psychotherapy outcomes: Limitations and liabilities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 54-64.
367. Wilson, W., & Miller, H. L. (1964a). The negative outlook. Psychological Reports, 15, 977-978.
368. Wilson, W., & Miller, H. L. (1964b). A note on the inconclusiveness of accepting the null hypothesis. Psychological Review, 71, 238-242.
369. Wilson, W., Miller, H. L. & Lower, J. S. (1967). Much ado about the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 188-196.
370. Winch, R. F., & Campbell, D. T. (1969). Proof? No. Evidence? Yes. The significance of tests of significance. American Sociologist, 4, 140-143.
371. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
372. Winkler, R. L. (1993). Bayesian statistics: An overview. In G. Kerens & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Volume 2. Statistical issues (pp. 201-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
373. Witte, R. S., & Witte, J. S. (1997). Statistics (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
374. Yates, F. (1951). The influences of statistical methods for research workers on the development of the science of statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46, 19-34.
375. Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1986). Use and misuse of no-difference findings in eliminating threats to validity. Evaluation Review, 10, 836-852.