Meta-Analysis and Science

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 229-246

  Sohn, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030542003     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354396062002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Begg, C.B., & Berlin, J.A. (1988). Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 151, 419-463.
2. Bem, D.J., & Honorton, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Evidence of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
3. Bergin, A.E. (1971). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 217-270). New York: Wiley.
4. Bergin, A.E., & Garfield, S.L. (1994). Overview, trends, and future issues. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.; pp. 821-830). New York: Wiley.
5. Bergin, A.E., & Lambert, M.J. (1978). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (2nd ed.; pp. 139-189). New York: Wiley.
6. Berlin, J.A., Begg, C.B., & Louis, T.A. (1989). An assessment of publication bias using a sample of published clinical trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 381-392.
7. Bozarth, J.D., & Roberts, R.R. (1972). Signifying significant significance. American Psychologist, 27, 774-775.
8. Cartwright, D. (1971). Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 361-378.
9. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
10. Cook, A.H. (1990). Gravitation. In The new encyclopaedia Britannica (15th ed.; Vol. 20, pp. 169-177). Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
11. Cooper, H.M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Coursal, A., & Wagner, E.E. (1986). Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: A note on meta-analysis bias. Professional Psychology, 17, 136-147.
13. Dawes, R.M. (1987). Random generators, ganzfelds, analysis, and theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 581-582.
14. Fiske, D.W., & Schweder, R.A. (Eds.). (1986). Metatheory in social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
16. Greenhouse, J.B., & Iyenger, S. (1988). Discussion of publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical society, Series A, 151, 454.
17. Greenwald, A.G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-20.
18. Hedges, L.V. (1992). Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 279-296.
19. Honorton, C., & Ferrari, D.C. (1989). ‘Future telling’: A meta-analysis of forced-choice precognition experiments, 1935-1987. Journal of Parapsychology, 53, 281-307.
20. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Lambert, M.J., & Bergin, A.E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.; pp. 143-189). New York: Wiley.
22. Lambert, M.J., Shapiro, D.A., & Bergin, A.E. (1986). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed.; pp. 157-211). New York: Wiley.
23. Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
24. Melton, A.W. (1962). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 553-557.
25. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
26. Olkin, I. (1990). History and goals. In K.W. Wachter & M.L. Straf (Eds.), The future of meta-analysis (pp. 3-10). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Schmidt, F.L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research finings, meta-analysis and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
29. Smith, M.L., Glass, G.V., & Miller, T.I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Sohn, D. (1993). Psychology of the scientist: LXVI. The idiot savants have taken over the psychology labs! Or why in science using the rejection of the null hypothesis as the basis for affirming the research hypothesis is unwarranted. Psychological Reports, 73, 1167-1175.
31. Steering Committee of the Physicians' Health Study Group (1988). Preliminary report: Findings of the aspirin component of the ongoing physicians' health study. New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 262-264.
32. Sterling, T.D. (1959). Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance-or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54, 30-34.
33. Watson, J.D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Atheneum.
34. Wortman, P.M. (1992). Lessons from the meta-analysis of quasi-experiments. In F.B. Bryant, J. Edwards, R.S. Tindale, E.J. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Methodological issues in applied social psychology (pp. 65-81). New York: Plenum.