Statistical Significance and Replicability: Response to Chow's and Falk's Commentary

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 331-334

  Sohn, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

hypothesis testing; statistical significance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0542395766     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354398083004     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Chow, S.L.(1998). What statistical significance means. Theory & Psychology, 8, 323-330.
2. Cohen, J.(1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
3. Cortina, J.M., & Dunlap, W.P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
4. Falk, R.(1998). Replication-A step in the right direction: Commentary on Sohn. Theory & Psychology, 8, 313-321.
5. Glass, G.V.(1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
6. Hagen, R.L.(1997). In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 52, 15-24.
7. Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court
8. Popper, K.R.(1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
9. Rozeboom, W.W.(1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
10. Sohn, D.(1998). Statistical significance and replicability: Why the former does not presage the latter. Theory & Psychology, 8, 291-311.
11. Stroop, J.R.(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.