The account taken of statistical power in research published in the British Journal of Psychology

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 71-83

  Clark Carter, David ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346618054     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02621.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Borenstein, M. & Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Reviewed in Iwanek, R. (1993). Software Reviews. Psychology Software News: Newsletter of the Computers in Teaching Initiative Centre for Psychology, 4 (1), 13-14.
2. Borenstein, M. & Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Reviewed in Iwanek, R. (1993). Software Reviews. Psychology Software News: Newsletter of the Computers in Teaching Initiative Centre for Psychology, 4 (1), 13-14.
3. Clark-Carter, D. (1994). The teaching of psychological statistics and research methods classes in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: A survey. Psychology Teaching Review, 3 (1), 50-57.
4. Clegg, F. (1982). Simple Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. London: Erlbaum.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8. Fisher, R. A. (1949). The Design of Experiments, 5th ed. London: Oliver & Boyd.
9. Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Probabilistic thinking and the fight against subjectivity. In L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer & M. S. Morgan (Eds), The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol 2: Ideas in the Sciences. London: MIT Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J. & Krüger, L. (1989). The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gillett, R. (1986). Sample size determination in replication attempts: The standard normal z test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 190-207.
12. Greene, J. & D'Oliveira, M. (1982). Learning to Use Statistical Tests in Psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
13. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical Methods for Psychology, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
14. Howson, C. & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
15. Huberty, C. J. (1993). Historical origins of statistical testing practices: The treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317-333.
16. Kraemer, H. C. & Thiemann, S. (1987). How Many Subjects: Statistical Power in Research. London: Sage.
17. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. London: Sage.
18. Meddis, R. (1984). Statistics Using Ranks: A Unified Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Miller, S. (1984). Experimental Design and Statistics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
20. Neyman, J. & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Parts I and II. Biometrika, 20, 174-240 and 263-294.
21. Robson, C. (1983). Experiment, Design and Statistics in Psychology: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
22. Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 775-777.
23. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, rev. ed. London: Sage.
24. Sedlmeier, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
25. Singer, B., Lovie, A. D. & Lovie, P. (1986). Sample size and power. In A. D. Lovie (Ed.), New Developments in Statistics for Psychology and the Social Sciences. London: The British Psychological Society and Methuen.
26. Wilcox, R. R. (1984). A review of exact hypothesis testing procedures (and selection techniques) that control power regardless of the variances. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 34-48.