Significance tests have their place

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 8-11

  Harris, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347351016     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00535.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Braver, S.L. (1975). On splitting the tails unequally: A new perspective on one- versus two-tailed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 283-301.
2. Greenwald, A.G., Gonzalez, R., Harris, R.J., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and p-values: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
3. Harris, R.J. (1994). An analysis of variance primer. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
4. Harris, R.J. (1996). The FEDS (Fraction of Expected Difference Significant) criterion for sample size, and the magic fraction .7. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
5. Harris, R.J. (in press). Reforming significance testing via three-valued logic. In L. Harlow & S. Mulaik (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Harris, R.J., & Quade, D. (1992). The Minimally Important Difference Significant criterion for sample size. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 27-49.
7. Kaiser, H.F. (1960). Directional statistical decisions. Psychological Review, 67, 160-167.
8. Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
9. Tukey, J.W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science, 6, 100-116.