Multiliteracies and Metalanguage: Describing Image/Text Relations as a Resource for Negotiating Multimodal Texts

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 377-405

  Unsworth, Len ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145125270     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Andrews, R. (2004). Where next in research on ICT and literacies. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 12(1), 58-67.
2. Baldry, A. (Ed.). (2000). Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age. Campobasso, Italy: Palladino Editore.
3. Bearne, E. (2000). Past perfect and future conditional: The challenge of new texts. In G. Hodges, M. Drummond, and M. Styles (Eds.), Tales, tellers and texts (pp. 145-156). London: Continuum.
4. Bolter, J. (1998). Hypertext and the question of visual literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, and R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 3-14). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
5. Boulter, D. (1999). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Browne, A. (1983). Gorilla. London: Julia MacRae.
7. Burn, A., and Parker, D. (2003). Tiger’s big plan: Multimodality and the moving image. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 56-72). New York: Peter Lang.
8. Burningham, J. (1977). Come away from the water, Shirley. London: Cape.
9. Burningham, J. (1978). Time to get out of the bath, Shirley. London: Cape.
10. Callow, J., and Unsworth, L. (1997). Equity in the videosphere. Southern Review, 30(3), 268-286.
11. Callow, J., and Zammit, K. (2002). Visual literacy: From picture books to electronic texts. In M. Monteith (Ed.), Teaching primary literacy with ICT (pp. 188-201). Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
12. Cheong, Y. (2004). The construal of ideational meaning in print advertisements. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 163-195). London: Continuum.
13. Commission, H. R. a. E. O. (1997). Bringing them home: National inquiry into the separation of aboriginal and torres strait islander children from their families. Sydney, Australia:Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission.
14. Cooper, H. (1996). The baby who wouldn’t go to bed. London: Doubleday/Picture Corgi Books.
15. Dresang, E. (1999). Radical change: Books for youth in a digital age. New York: Wilson.
16. Gee, J. (2003). What computer games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Gill, T. (2002). Visual and verbal playmates: An exploration of visual and verbal modalities in children’s picture books. Unpublished B.A., Honours, University of Sydney.
18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). Language as system and language as instance: The corpus as a theoretical construct. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991 (pp. 61-77). Berlin, Germany:De Gruyter.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Language in a changing world. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Occasional Paper, 13, 62-81.
20. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London:Edward Arnold.
21. Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday: Vol. 3. On language and linguistics. (pp. 139-174). London/New York: Continuum.
22. Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
23. Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
24. Halliday, M. A. K., and Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
25. Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
26. Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
27. Howley, P. (1996). Visual literacy: Semiotic theory, primary school syllabus documents and classroom practice. Unpublished Bachelor of Education Honours, University of Sydney, Sydney.
28. Jewitt, C. (2002). The move from page to screen: The multimodal reshaping of school English. Visual Communication, 1(2), 171-196.
29. Kamil, M., Intrator, S., and Kim, H. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and learning. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 771-788). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication:the potentials of new forms of of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen:Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
31. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to Thinking About Language. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 337-340.
32. Kress, G. (2000a). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Learning literacy and the design of social futures (pp. 153-161). Melbourne: Macmillan.
33. Kress, G. (2000b). Multimodality. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). Melbourne: Macmillan.
34. Kress, G. (2001). Sociolinguistics and social semiotics. In P. Cobley (Ed.), Semiotics and linguistics (pp. 66-82). London: Routledge.
35. Kress, G. (2003a). Genres and the multimodal production of ‘scientificness’. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 173-186). New York: Peter Lang.
36. Kress, G. (2003b). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
37. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: A grammar of visual design. London:Routledge.
38. Lemke, J. (1998a). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, and R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology:Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-302). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
39. Lemke, J. (1998b). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
40. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299-325.
41. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. Ruddell and N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (Vol. 5, pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
43. Lim, V. F. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 220-246). London and New York: Continuum.
44. Locke, T., and Andrews, R. (2004). ICT and literature: A Faustian compact? In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy education (pp. 124-152). London: Routledge/Falmer.
45. Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(10), 356-385.
46. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003a). A telling symbiosis in the discourse of hatred: Multimodal news texts about the ‘children overboard’ affair. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 1-16.
47. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003b). Working the borders in racist discourse: The challenge of the “children overboard affair” in news media texts. Social Semiotics, 13(3), 283-303.
48. Macken-Horarik, M. (2004). Interacting with the multimodal text: Reflections on image and verbiage in artexpress. Visual Communication, 3(1), 5-26.
49. Mandela, N. (1996). The illustrated long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Little, Brown and Company.
50. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
51. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston and G.Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
52. Martin, J. R. (2002). Fair trade: Negotiating meaning in multimodal texts. In P. Coppock (Ed.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing. (pp. 311-338). Begijnhof, Belgium: Brepols and Indiana University Press.
53. Martin, J. R. (2003). Voicing the ‘other’: Reading and writing indigenous australians. In G.Weiss and R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 199-219). London: Palgrave.
54. Martin, J. R., and Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (1 ed., Vol. 1). London/New York: Continuum.
55. Martinec, R. (1999). Cohesion in action. Semiotica, 1/2, 161-180.
56. Martinec, R. (2000a). Rhythm in multimodal texts. Leonardo, 33(4), 289-297.
57. Martinec, R. (2000b). Types of process in action. Semiotica, 130(3/4), 243-268.
58. Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo, Japan:International Language Sciences.
59. McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Collins.
60. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan.
61. Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
62. O’Halloran, K. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum.
63. O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. London: Leicester University Press.
64. Quinn, M. (2004). Talking with Jess: Looking at how metalanguage assisted explanation writing in the middle years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 245-261.
65. Richards, C. (2001). Hypermedia, Internet communication, and the challenge of redefining literacy in the electronic age. Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 59-77.
66. Royce, T. (1998). Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in pagebased multimodal text. Japan Association Systemic Functional Linguistics Occasional Papers, 1(1), 25-50.
67. Royce, T. (2002). Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: Exploring visual-verbal synergy. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191-205.
68. Russell, G. (2000). Print-based and visual discourses in schools: Implications for pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 21(2), 205-217.
69. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., and Oteiza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67-93.
71. Sendak, M. (1962). Where the wild things are. London: The Bodley Head.
72. Steinbeck, J. (1996). Of mice and men. New York: Penguin Electronics. (Original work published 1937.)
73. Torr, J., and Harman, J. (1997). Literacy and the language of science in year one classrooms:Implications for children’s learning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 20(3), 222-237.
74. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
75. Unsworth, L. (2004). Comparing school science explanations in books and computer-based formats: The role of images, image/text relations and hyperlinks. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(3), 283-301.
76. Unsworth, L. (2006). E-literature for children: Enhancing digital literacy learning. London:Routledge/Falmer.
77. Unsworth, L., Thomas, A., and Bush, R. (2004). The role of images and image-text relations in group ‘basic skills tests’ of literacy for children in the primary school years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(1), 46-65.
78. Unsworth, L., Thomas, A., Simpson, A., and Asha, J. (2005). Children’s literature and computer based teaching. London: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
79. Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London: Macmillan.
80. Veel, R. (1998). The greening of school science: Ecogenesis in secondary classrooms. In J. R.Martin and R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Functional and critical perspectives on the discourses of science. London: Routledge.
81. Williams, G. (1999). Children becoming readers: Reading and literacy. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding children’s literature (pp. 151-162). London: Routledge.
82. Williams, G. (2000). Children’s literature, children and uses of language description. In L.Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: A functional linguistic perspective. London: Cassell.