The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning

Handbook of Reading Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 771-788

  Kamil, Michael L ^a   Intrator, Sam M ^a,b   Kim, Helen S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071562739     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Allen, G., & Thompson, A. (1995). Analysis of the effect of networking on computer-situated collaboration writing in a fifth-grade classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 65-76
2. Anderson-Inman, L. (1991). Enabling students with learning disabilities: Insights from research. Computing Teacher, 8, 26-29
3. Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
4. Atkinson, R., & Hansen, D. (1966-1967). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-26
5. Baer, V. E. H. (1988). Computers as composition tools: A case study of student attitudes. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15, 144-148
6. Balajthy, E. (1989). Computers and reading: Lessons from the past and the technologies of the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
7. Bangert-Drowns, R. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93
8. Batson, T. (1993a). ENFI research. Computers and Composition, 10, 93-101
9. Batson, T. (1993b). The origins of ENFI. In J. K Peyton, B. C. Bruce, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 87-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Beach, R., & Lundell, D. (1998). Early adolescents' use of computer-mediated communication in writing and reading. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
11. Becker, D., & Dwyer, M. M. (1994). Using hypermedia to provide learner control. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 155-172
12. Boone, R., Higgins, K, Notari, A., & Stump, C. S. (1996). Hypermedia pre-reading lessons: Leamer-centered software for kindergarten. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 7, 39-70
13. Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 49-65
14. Burnett, J. (1986). Word processing as a writing tool of an elementary school student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
15. Chen, c., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human Computer Interaction, 11, 125-156
16. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459
17. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21-29
18. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155
19. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press
20. Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95, 185-210
21. Cutler, R. B., & Truss, C. V. (1989). Computer aided instruction as a reading motivator. Reading Improvement, 26, 103-109
22. D' Agostino, K, & Varone, S. D. (1991). Interacting with basic writers in the computer classroom. Computers and Composition, 8, 39-49
23. Daiute, C. (1983). Writing and computers. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
24. Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159
25. Daiute, c., & Kruideneir, J. (1985). A self-questioning strategy to increase young writers' revising processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 307-318
26. Dickinson, D. K (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a first-second grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 357-378
27. Eldred, J. c., & Hawisher, G. E. (1995). Researching electronic networks. Written Communication, 12 330-359
28. Elkins, J. (1986). Self-help for older writers with spelling and composing difficulties: Using the word processor and spelling checker. Exceptional Child, 33, 73-76
29. Ferrier, L. J., & Shane, H. C. (1987). Computer-based communication aids for the nonspeaking child with cerebral palsy. Seminars in Speech & Language, 8, 107-122
30. Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1995). Broadening the lens: Toward an expanded conceptualization of literacy. In K A. Hinchman, D. J. Leu, & c. K Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-16). Chicago: National Reading Conference
31. Forcier, R. C. (1995). The computer as a productivity tool in education. Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall
32. Forman, J. (1990). Leadership dynamics of computer-supported writing. Computers and Composition, 7, 35-46
33. Gambrell, L., Bradley, V., & McLaughlin, E. (1987). Young children's comprehension and recall of computer screen displayed text. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 156-163
34. Gillingham, M. (1993). Effects of question complexity and reader strategies on adults' hypertext comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 1-15
35. Gonzalez-Edfelt, N. (1990). Oral interaction and collaboration at the computer. Computers in the Schools, 7, 53-90
36. Gould, J., & Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hardcopy and with CRT terminals. Human Factors, 26, 323-337
37. Greenlee-Moore, M. E., & Smith, L. L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children's reading achievement. Reading Psychology, 12, 43-64
38. Gruber, S. (1995). Re: Ways we contribute: Students, instructors and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 12, 61-78
39. Haas, c., & Hayes, J. (1985). Reading on the computer: A comparison of standard and advanced computer display and hardcopy (CDC Tech. Rep. No.7.) Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Communications Design Center
40. Hague, S. A, & Mason, G. (1986). Using the computers readability measure to teach students to revise their writing. Journal of Reading, 30, 14-17
41. Hartman, K. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113
42. Hativa, N., Shapira, R., & Navon, D. (1990). Computer-managed practice: Effects on instructional methods and teacher adoption. Teacher and Teacher Education, 6, 55-68
43. Hawisher, G., LeBlanc, P., Moran, c., & Selfe, C. (1996). Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education, 1979-1994: A history. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
44. Hawkins, J., Sheingold, K., Gearhart, M., & Berger, C. (1982). Microcomputers in schools: Impact on the social life of elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, 361-373
45. Hine, M., Goldman, S. R, & Cosden, M., A. (1990). Error monitoring by learning handicapped students engaged in collaborative microcomputer-based writing. Journal of Special Education, 23, 407-422
46. Horney, M. A, & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The electrotext project: hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 71-91
47. Intrator, S., & Kamil, M. L. (1998, April). Qualitative trends in publication of research on technology and reading, writing, and literacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA
48. Jonassen, D., Campbell, J., & Davidson, M. (1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 31-39
49. Kamil, M. L. (1982). Technology and reading: A review of research and instruction. InJ. Niles & L. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction: Thirty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 251-260). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference
50. Kamil, M. L. (1998, December). A taxonomy of hypertext links. Paper presented atthe annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX
51. Kamil, M. L., & Intrator, S. (1998). Quantitative trends in publication of research on technology and reading, writing, and literacy. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), National Reading Conference Yearbook 47 (pp. 385-396). Chicago: National Reading Conference
52. Kamil, M. L., & Lane, D. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook ofliteracy and teChnology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
53. Kent, J. F., & Rakestraw, J. (1994). The role of computers in functional language: A tale of two writers. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, S, 329-337
54. Kozma, R B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179-211
55. Kozma, R B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7-19
56. Kremers, M. (1990). Sharing authority on a synchronous network: The case for riding the beast. Computers and Composition, 7, 69-77
57. Kulik, c. c., & Kulik, J. A (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94
58. Kulik, J. A, Kulik, C. c., & c., Peter A (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525-544
59. Kumpulainen, K. (1996). The nature of peer interaction in the social context created by the use of word processors. Learning and Instruction, 6, 243-261
60. Labbo, L. D., Reinking, D., & McKenna, M. (1995). Incorporating the computer into kindergarten: Acase study. In K. A. Hinchman, D. J. Leu, & c. K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 459-465). Chicago: National Reading Conference
61. Lepper, M., & Chabay, R (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, 20, 217-230
62. Lepper, M., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction (pp. 255-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
63. Levin, H. M., Glass, G., & Meister, G. (1987). Cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction. Evaluation Review, 11, 50-72
64. Levin, H. M., & Meister, G. (1986). Is CAl cost-effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 67745-749
65. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1995). The effect of hypermedia assisted instruction on second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 159-175
66. Mabrito, M. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and high-apprehensive writers: Rethinking the collaborative process. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 55, 26-29
67. MacArthur, C. A. (1998). Word processing with speech synthesis and word prediction: Effects on the dialogue journal writing of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 151-166
68. Mayer, R. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19
69. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320
70. McConnell, D. (1997). Computer support for management learning. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Ed.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 283-294). London: Sage
71. McMillan, K, & Honey, M. (1993). Year one of project pulse: Pupils using laptops in science and English (Tech. Rep. 26). New York: Center for Technology in Education
72. Mehan, H., Moll, I., & Riel, M.M. (1985). Computers in classrooms: A quasi-experiment in guided change (Final report NIE 6-83-0027). San Diego: University of California
73. Mendels, P. (1998, April 27). U.5. official calls for studies of technology in classrooms. The New York Times on the Web [Online]. Available: http://home.earthlink.net/-aske/education/technologyI.htm
74. Michaels, S. (1986, April). Computer as dependent variable. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA
75. Miller, J. D. (1993). Script writing on computer network: Quenching the flames or feeding the fire. InJ. Kreeft Peyton, B. C. Bruce, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 124-137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
76. Miller, I., & Olson, J. (1995). How computers live in schools. Educational Leadership, 53, 74-77
77. Montague, M. (1990). Computers cognition, and writing instruction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
78. Neilsen, J. (1998). Electronic books-A bad idea. The Alertbox: Current Issues in Web Usability [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980726.html
79. Nelson, K E., & Camarata, S. M. (1996). Improving English literacy and speech-acquisition learning conditions for children with severe to profound hearing impairments. Volta Review, 98, 17-41
80. Neuman, S. (1991). Literacy in the television age. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
81. Niemiec, R. P. (1987). Comparative effects of computer-assisted instruction: A synthesis of reviews. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 19-37
82. Niemiec, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (1985). Computers and achievement in the elementary schools. Journal ofEducational Computing Research, 1, 435-440
83. Niemiec, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). CAl can be doubly effective. Phi Delta Knppan, 67, 750-751
84. Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 45--62
85. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press
86. Palmquist, M. (1993). Network-supported interaction in two writing classes. Computers and Composition, 10, 25-53
87. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
88. Phenix, J., & Hannan, E. (1984). Word processing in the grade one classroom. Language Arts, 61, 804-812
89. Plass, J. I., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36
90. Plowman, I. (1993). Tracing the evolution of co-authored text. Language and Communication, 13, 149-161
91. Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. New York: Alfred Knopf
92. Purves, A. C. (1998). The web of text and the web of god: An essay on the third information transformation. New York: Guilford Press
93. Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. I. (1995). Special issue: Technology for persons with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141-158
94. Reinking, D. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 484-498
95. Reinking, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In K Hinchman, D. Leu, & C. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice (pp. 17-33). Chicago: National Reading Conference
96. Reinking, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, I. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of Literacy and Technology (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
97. Reinking, D., & Bridwell-Bowles, I. (1991). Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M. I. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. II, pp. 310-340). New York: Longman
98. Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, I., and Kieffer, R. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
99. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (1996). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading (Reading Research Rep. No. 55). National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens
100. Rice, G. (1994). Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 11, 153-178
101. Romano, S. (1993). The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Which yardstick? Computers and Composition, 10, 5-28
102. Rouet, J., Levonen, J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. (Eds.). (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
103. Schofield, J. W. (1997). Computers and classroom social processes-A review of the literature. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 27-39
104. Scott, D., Kahlich, P., & Barker, J. (1994). Motivating at-risk students using a literature based writing unit with computers. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 5, 311-317
105. Shanahan, T., & Kamil, M. (1994). Academic libraries and research in the teaching of English. Champaign, IL: National Conference on Research in English and Center for the Study of Reading
106. Sharp, D. L. M., Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., Risko, V., Kinzer, c., & Vye, N. (1995). Dynamic visual support for story comprehension and mental model building by young, at-risk children. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43, 25-42
107. Sheingold, K., Kane, J. H., & Endreweit, M.E. (1983). Microcomputer use in schools: Developing a research agenda. Harvard Educational Review, 4, 412-432
108. Smith, K. (1992). Using multimedia with Navajo children: An effort to alleviate problems of cultural learning style, background of experience, and motivation. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 8, 287-294
109. Snyder, I. (1993). The impact of computers on students' writing: A comparative study of the effects of pens and word processors on writing context, process and product. Australian Journal of Education, 37, 5-25
110. Sormunen, c., & Ray, C. (1996). Teaching collaborative writing with group support systems software-An experiment. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 38, 125-138
111. Spache, G. (1967). Reading technology. In G. Schick & M. May (Eds.), Junior college and adult reading programs-Expanding fields: Sixteenth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 178-184). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference
112. Steelman, J. D., Pierce, P. L., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (1993). The role of computers in promoting literacy in children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI). Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 76-88
113. Warschauer, M. (1995-1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-25
114. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Policy Information Reports. Princeton, NJ: ETS Policy Information Center
115. Woodward, J., & Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 503-536