Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 39 Part B, Issue , 2013, Pages 37-61

  Jarzabkowski, Paula ^a   Smets, Michael ^a   Bednarek, Rebecca ^a   Burke, Gary ^a   Spee, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Ambidexterity; Institutional complexity; Institutional logics; Practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85120006457     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB015     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Almandoz, J. (2012). Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1381–1406
2. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.
3. Aurini, J. (2006). Crafting legitimation projects: An institutional analysis of private education businesses. Sociological Forum, 21(1), 83–111.
4. Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 490–515). London: Sage.
5. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419– 1440.
6. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
7. Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory & Society, 36(6), 547–571.
8. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.
9. Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
11. Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and inertia as coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 325–357.
12. Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.
13. Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioural complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218.
14. Chia, R. C. H., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Cook, S., & Brown, J. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
17. Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A., & Austin, J. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organizational Science, 13(5), 475–496.
18. Delbridge, R., & Edwards, T. (2008). Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during nonisomorphic institutional change. Human Relations, 61(3), 299–325.
19. Delmestri, G. (2006). Streams of inconsistent institutional influences: Middle managers as carriers of multiple identities. Human Relations, 59(11), 1515–1541.
20. Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179–215.
21. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263.
22. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23. Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2003). Conclusion: Globalization as a double process of institutional change and institution building. In M. L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions (pp. 302–334). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24. Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149.
25. D’Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. N. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: The case of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 636–661.
26. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
27. Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–1576.
28. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Gabbioneta, C., Greenwood, R., Mazzola, P., & Minoja, M. (forthcoming). The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality. Accounting, Organizations & Society.
30. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214.
31. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
32. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
33. Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.
34. Greenwood, R., Magàn Diaz, A., Li, S., & Ce´spedes Lorente, J. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.
35. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micellota, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Annals of the Academy of Management, 5(1), 1–55.
36. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. [Article]. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.
37. Grey, C. (2003). The real world of Enron’s auditors. Organization, 10(3), 572–576.
38. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 693–706.
39. Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
40. He, Z., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494.
41. Heimer, C. A. (1999). Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 17–66.
42. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of ‘‘old’’ and ‘‘new’’ institutionalisms. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406–418.
43. Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811.
44. Jansen, J. J. P., van de Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57, 351–363.
45. Jansen, J. J. P., van de Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
46. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursive, adaptive and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560.
47. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
48. Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5–27.
49. Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., & Van de Ven, A. (2009). Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 284– 316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Kellogg, K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and micro institutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 657–711.
51. Kitchener, M. (2002). Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organization Studies, 23(3), 391–420.
52. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.
53. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage.
54. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. LeBaron, C. (2005). Considering the social and material surround: Toward microethnographic understandings of nonverbal behavior. In V. Manusov (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures (pp. 493–506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. LeBaron, C. (2008). Video-based methods for research on strategy as practice: Looking at people, places and things. Key note presented at the professional development workshop: Strategy as practice: Methodological challenges. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Anaheim.
57. LeBaron, C., Glenn, P., & Thompson, M. P. (2009). Identity work during boundary moments: Managing positive identities through talk and embodied interaction. In L. M. Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundations (pp. 191–215). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
58. LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (1997). Built space and the interactional framing of experience during a murder interrogation. Human Studies, 20, 1–25.
59. Leonardi, P. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrications of human and material agencies. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.
60. Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). Myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.
61. Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York, NY: The Free Press.
62. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305–1335.
63. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307.
64. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012.
65. Lubatkin, A. S., Simsek, Z., Yan, L., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 32, 626–672.
66. March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
67. March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577.
68. Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820.
69. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
70. Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931.
71. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
72. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 74–81.
73. Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
74. Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–141.
75. Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 455–476.
76. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033–1065.
77. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.
78. Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.
79. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.
80. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.
81. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351–384.
82. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
83. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429–460.
84. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877.
85. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
86. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. v. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
87. Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.
89. Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approach to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14(6), 650–669.
90. Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597–624.
91. Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (forthcoming). (Re)-constructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations.
92. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multi-level model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.
93. Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448–461.
94. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.
95. Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Streeck, J., & Mehus, S. (2005). Microethnography: The study of practices. In K. L. Fitch & R. S. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 381–404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
97. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.
98. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. [Article]. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
99. Sztompka, P. (1991). Society in action: The theory of social becoming. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
100. Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity In institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81–101.
101. Thornton, P. H., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. In M. Lounsbury (Ed.), Transformation in cultural industries (pp. 125–170). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
102. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Singapore: Sage.
103. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2), 261–285. doi: 10.1177/017084069701800204
105. Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163–179.
106. Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
107. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
108. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(27), 613–634.
109. Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234–254.
110. Zilber, T. B. (2011). Institutional multiplicity in practice: A tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organization Science, 22(6), 1539–1559.