Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in

Administrative Science Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 325-357

  Burgelman, Robert A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036625175     PISSN: 00018392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3094808     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aldrich, H. 1999 Organizations Evolving. London: Sage.
2. Allison, G., and P. Zelikow 1999 Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2d ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
3. Arthur, B. 1987 "Competing technologies: An overview." In G. Dosi (ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory: 590-607. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Audia, P.G., E.A. Locke, and K.G. Smith 2000 "The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change." Academy of Management Journal, 43: 837-853.
5. Bamford, Raymond S., and Robert A. Burgelman 1997a "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (A)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49A. 1997b "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (B)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49B. 1998 "Intel's strategic position in the family room, 1998." Stanford Business School Case SM-50.
6. Bamford, Raymond S., and Robert A. Burgelman 1997a "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (A)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49A. 1997b "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (B)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49B. 1998 "Intel's strategic position in the family room, 1998." Stanford Business School Case SM-50.
7. Bamford, Raymond S., and Robert A. Burgelman 1997a "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (A)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49A. 1997b "Intel Corporation: The Hood River Project (B)." Stanford Business School Case SM-49B. 1998 "Intel's strategic position in the family room, 1998." Stanford Business School Case SM-50.
8. Barnett, W.P. 1997 "The dynamics of competitive intensity." Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 128-160.
9. Barnett, W.P., and M.T. Hansen 1996 "The red queen in organizational evolution." Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 17: 139-157.
10. Baum, J.A.C., and B. McKelvey (eds.) 1999 Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Bendor, J., and T.H. Hammond 1992 "Rethinking Allison's models." American Political Science Review, 86: 301-322.
12. Bower, J.L. 1970 Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Brown, S.L., and K.M. Eisenhardt 1997 "The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1-34.
14. Burgelman, R.A. 1983 "A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm." Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244. 1991 "Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research." Organization Science, 2: 239-262. 1994 "Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments." Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24-56. 2002 Strategy is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future. New York: Free Press.
15. Burgelman, R.A. 1983 "A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm." Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244. 1991 "Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research." Organization Science, 2: 239-262. 1994 "Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments." Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24-56. 2002 Strategy is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future. New York: Free Press.
16. Burgelman, R.A. 1983 "A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm." Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244. 1991 "Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research." Organization Science, 2: 239-262. 1994 "Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments." Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24-56. 2002 Strategy is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future. New York: Free Press.
17. Burgelman, R.A. 1983 "A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm." Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244. 1991 "Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research." Organization Science, 2: 239-262. 1994 "Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments." Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24-56. 2002 Strategy is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future. New York: Free Press.
18. Burgelman, R.A., D.L. Carter, and R.S. Bamford 1999 "Intel Corporation: The evolution of an adaptive organization." Stanford Business School Case SM-65.
19. Burstein, D., and D. Kline 1995 "In the square-off between TV and computer, the smart money might be on the boob tube." Los Angeles Times, October 29.
20. Christensen, C.M., and J.L. Bower 1996 "Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms." Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197-218.
21. Cogan, G.W., and R.A. Burgelman 1991 "Intel Corporation (C): Strategies for the 1990s." Stanford Business School Case PS-BP-256C.
22. Collins, J.C. 2001 Good to Great. New York: HarperBusiness.
23. Dyck, B., and F.A. Starke 1999 "The formation of breakaway organizations: Observations and a process model." Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 792-822.
24. Farrell, J., H.K. Monroe, and G. Saloner 1998 "The vertical organization of industry: Systems competition versus component competition." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7: 143-182.
25. Fine, K.M., and R.A. Burgelman 1997 "Intel Corporation (F): Going beyond success in 1997." Stanford Business School Case S-BP-256F.
26. Gersick, C.J.G. 1994 "Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture." Academy of Management Journal, 37: 9-45.
27. Gilder, G. 1989 Microcosm: The Quantum Revolution in Economics and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster.
28. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
29. Grove, A.S. 1993 "How Intel makes spending pay off." Fortune, February 22: 57-61. 1996 Only the Paranoid Survive. New York: Doubleday.
30. Grove, A.S. 1993 "How Intel makes spending pay off." Fortune, February 22: 57-61. 1996 Only the Paranoid Survive. New York: Doubleday.
31. Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman 1977 "The population ecology of organizations." American Journal of Sociology, 83: 929-984. 1984 "Structural inertia and organizational change." American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
32. Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman 1977 "The population ecology of organizations." American Journal of Sociology, 83: 929-984. 1984 "Structural inertia and organizational change." American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
33. Isaacson, W. 1997 "The microchip is the dynamo of a new economy driven by the passion of Intel's Andrew Grove." Time, December 29: 46-51.
34. Kawamoto, D., and S. Galante 1998 "The legacy of Andy Grove." CNET, March 26.
35. Leonard-Barton, D. 1990 "A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites." Organization Science, 1: 248-266.
36. Levinthal, D., and J.G. March 1993 "The myopia of learning." Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 14: 95-112.
37. Lovas, B., and S. Ghoshal 2000 "Strategy as guided evolution." Strategic Management Journal, 21: 875-896.
38. March, J.G. 1991 "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning." Organization Science, 1: 71-87.
39. Miller, D. 1994 "What happens after success: The perils of excellence." Journal of Management Studies, 31: 85-102. 1999 "Selection processes inside organizations: The self-reinforcing consequences of success." In J.A.C. Baum and B. McKelvey (eds.), Variations in Organization Science: in Honor of Donald T. Campbell: 93-109. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Miller, D. 1994 "What happens after success: The perils of excellence." Journal of Management Studies, 31: 85-102. 1999 "Selection processes inside organizations: The self-reinforcing consequences of success." In J.A.C. Baum and B. McKelvey (eds.), Variations in Organization Science: in Honor of Donald T. Campbell: 93-109. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Miller, D., and M.-J. Chen 1994 "Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry." Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 1-23.
42. Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel 1998 Strategy Safari. New York: Free Press.
43. Pfeifer, J., and G.R. Salancik 1978 The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
44. Pollack, A. 1988 "An 'awesome' Intel corners its market." New York Times, April 3.
45. Prahalad, C.K., and R.A. Bettis 1986 "The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance." Strategic Management Journal, 7: 485-501.
46. Reinhardt, A., I. Sager, and P. Burrows 1997 "Can Andy Grove keep profits up in an era of cheap PCs?" Business Week, December 22.
47. Rotemberg, J.J., and G. Saloner 1994 "The benefits of narrow business strategies." American Economic Review, 84: 1330-1349. 2000 "Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction." RAND Journal of Economics, 31: 693-716.
48. Rotemberg, J.J., and G. Saloner 1994 "The benefits of narrow business strategies." American Economic Review, 84: 1330-1349. 2000 "Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction." RAND Journal of Economics, 31: 693-716.
49. Schlender, B.R. 1989 "Intel produces a chip packing huge power and wide ambitions." Wall Street Journal, February 28. 1996 "A conversation with the lords of Wintel." Fortune, July 8.
50. Schlender, B.R. 1989 "Intel produces a chip packing huge power and wide ambitions." Wall Street Journal, February 28. 1996 "A conversation with the lords of Wintel." Fortune, July 8.
51. Sorenson, O. 2000 "Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy." Strategic Management Journal, 21: 577-592.
52. Sørensen, J.B., and T. Stuart 2000 "Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation." Administrative Science Quarterly, 45:81-112.
53. Steere, D., and R.A. Burgelman 1993a"Intel Corporation (D): Microprocessors at the crossroads." Stanford Business School Case S-BP-256D. 1993b" Intel Corporation (E): New directions for the 1990s." Stanford Business School Case S-BP-256E.
54. Steere, D., and R.A. Burgelman 1993a"Intel Corporation (D): Microprocessors at the crossroads." Stanford Business School Case S-BP-256D. 1993b" Intel Corporation (E): New directions for the 1990s." Stanford Business School Case S-BP-256E.
55. Suzuki, O., and R.A. Burgelman 1998 "The PC-based desktop videoconferencing systems industry in 1998." Stanford Business School Case SM-51.
56. Tredennick, N. 1991 "1991: The year of the RISC." Microprocessor Report, February 6: 16.
57. Tushman, M.E., and E. Romanelli 1985 "Organization evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation." In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 171-222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
58. Van de Ven, A.H. 1992 "Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note." Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 13: 169-188.
59. Welch, J., with J.A. Byrne 2001 Jack. New York: Warner Business.
60. Yin, R.K. 1984 Case Study Research. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61. Zuckerman, E.W. 2000 "Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification." Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 591-619.