Optimising a stevia mix by mixture design and napping: A case study with high protein plain yoghurt

International Dairy Journal

Volumn 110, Issue , 2020, Pages

  Ribeiro, Michele Nayara ^a   Rodrigues, Daniela Maria ^a   Rocha, Renata Abadia Reis ^a   Silveira, Letícia Rodrigues ^a   Condino, João Paulo Ferreira ^b   Júnior, Arlindo Curzi ^b   de Souza, Vanessa Rios ^a   Nunes, Cleiton Antônio ^a   Pinheiro, Ana Carla Marques ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

^b Verde Campo SA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; PROTEINS; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; EUCLIDIAN DISTANCE; MINIMUM COST; MIXTURE DESIGN; REBAUDIOSIDE-A; SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS; SENSORY PROFILES; STANDARD SAMPLES;

SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

EID: 85088918877     PISSN: 09586946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104802     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Akonor, P.T., Dziedzoave, N.T., Buckman, E.S., Mireku Essel, E., Lavoe, F., Tomlins, K.I., Sensory optimization of crackers developed from high-quality cassava flour, starch, and prawn powder. Food Sciences and Nutrition 5 (2017), 564–569.
2. Barroso, M., Barros, L., Rodrigues, M.A., Sousa, M.J., Santos-Buelga, C., Ferreira, I.C., Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni cultivated in Portugal: A prospective study of its antioxidant potential in different conservation conditions. Industrial Crops and Products 90 (2016), 49–55.
3. Baugreet, S., Kerry, J.P., Allen, P., Hamill, R.M., Optimisation of protein-fortified beef patties targeted to the needs of older adults: A mixture design approach. Meat Science 134 (2017), 111–118.
4. Binns, N.M., Sucralose–all sweetness and light. Nutrition Bulletin 28 (2003), 53–58.
5. Bro, R., Smilde, A.K., Centering and scaling in component analysis. Journal of Chemometrics 17 (2003), 16–33.
6. Cadena, R.S., Cruz, A.G., Netto, R.R., Castro, W.F., Faria, J.D.A.F., Bolini, H.M.A., Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Research International 54 (2013), 1670–1679.
7. Carakostas, M., Prakash, I., Kinghorn, A.D., Wu, C.D., Soerjato, D.D., Steviol glycosides. Nabors, L.O.B., (eds.) Alternative sweeteners, 4th ed., chapt. 11, 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
8. Chattopadhyay, S., Raychaudhuri, U., Chakraborty, R., Artificial sweeteners–a review. Journal of Food Science & Technology 51 (2014), 611–621.
9. Chollet, M., Gille, D., Schmid, A., Walther, B., Piccinali, P., Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 96 (2013), 5501–5511.
10. Cornell, J.A., Experiments with mixtures: Designs, models, and the analysis of mixture data. 2011, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
11. Cruz, A.G., Cadena, R.S., Castro, W.F., Esmerino, E.A., Rodrigues, J.B., Gaze, L., et al. Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale. Food Research International 54 (2013), 601–610.
12. Dooley, L., Threlfall, R.T., Meullenet, J.F., Optimization of blended wine quality through maximization of consumer liking. Food Quality and Preference 24 (2012), 40–47.
13. Drake, M.A., Gerard, P.D., Chen, X.Q., Effects of sweetener, sweetener concentration, and fruit flavor on sensory properties of soy fortified yogurt. Journal of Sensory Studies 16 (2001), 393–405.
14. Ekpong, A., Ngarmsak, T., Winger, R.J., Comparing sensory methods for the optimisation of mango gel snacks. Food Quality and Preference 17 (2006), 622–628.
15. Fleming, E.E., Ziegler, G.R., Hayes, J.E., Check-all-that-apply (CATA), sorting, and polarized sensory positioning (PSP) with astringent stimuli. Food Quality and Preference 45 (2015), 41–49.
16. Gasmalla, M.A.A., Yang, R., Hua, X., Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: An alternative sugar replacer and its application in food industry. Food Engineering Reviews 6 (2014), 150–162.
17. Greenly, L.W., A doctor's guide to sweeteners. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2, 2003 Article 80.
18. Guggisberg, D., Piccinali, P., Schreier, K., Effects of sugar substitution with stevia, actilight™ and stevia combinations or palatinose™ on rheological and sensory characteristics of low-fat and whole milk set yoghurt. International Dairy Journal 21 (2011), 636–644.
19. Henika, R.G., Use of response surface methodology in sensory evaluation. Food Technology 36 (1982), 96–101.
20. Hoppert, K., Zahn, S., Jänecke, L., Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., Rohm, H., Consumer acceptance of regular and reduced-sugar yogurt enriched with different types of dietary fiber. International Dairy Journal 28 (2013), 1–7.
21. Huertas, R.A.P., Yogur en la salud humana. Revista Lasallista de Investigación 9 (2012), 162–177.
22. Hung, Y., de Kok, T.M., Verbeke, W., Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Science 121 (2016), 119–126.
23. Imamura, F., O'Connor, L., Ye, Z., Mursu, J., Hayashino, Y., Bhupathiraju, S.N., et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ, 351, 2015 Article h3576.
24. Kalicka, D., Znamirowska, A., Buniowska, M., Esteve Más, M.J., Frigola Canoves, A., Effect of stevia addition on selected properties of yoghurt during refrigerated storage. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences 32 (2017), 323–334.
25. Karam, M.C., Gaiani, C., Hosri, C., Burgain, J., Scher, J., Effect of dairy powders fortification on yogurt textural and sensorial properties: A review. Journal of Dairy Research 80 (2013), 400–409.
26. Khan, S.A., Artificial sweeteners: Safe or unsafe?. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 65 (2015), 225–227.
27. Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H., Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2010, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
28. Lemus-Mondaca, R., Vega-Gálvez, A., Zura-Bravo, L., Ah-Hen, K., Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, source of a high-potency natural sweetener: A comprehensive review on the biochemical, nutritional and functional aspects. Food Chemistry 132 (2012), 1121–1132.
29. Lustig, R.H., Schmidt, L.A., Brindis, C.D., Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature, 482, 2012 Article 27.
30. McCain, H.R., Kaliappan, S., Drake, M.A., Invited review: Sugar reduction in dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science 101 (2018), 8619–8640.
31. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G.V., Carr, B.T., Sensory evaluation techniques. 2006, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
32. Monaco, R.D., Miele, N.A., Cavella, S., Masi, P., New chestnut-based chips optimization: Effects of ingredients. LWT-Food Science and Technology 43 (2010), 126–132.
33. Morais, E.C., Esmerino, E.A., Monteiro, R.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Cruz, A.G., et al. Prebiotic low sugar chocolate dairy desserts: Physical and optical characteristics and performance of parafac and pca preference map. Journal of Food Science 81 (2016), S156–S164.
34. Morais, E.C., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Bolini, H.M.A., Multiple time-intensity analysis and temporal dominance of sensations of chocolate dairy dessert using prebiotic and different high-intensity sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 29 (2014), 339–350.
35. Narayanan, P., Chinnasamy, B., Jin, L., Clark, S., Use of just-about-right scales and penalty analysis to determine appropriate concentrations of stevia sweeteners for vanilla yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 97 (2014), 3262–3272.
36. Nunes, C.A., Freitas, M.P., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Bastos, S.C., Chemoface: A novel free user-friendly interface for chemometrics. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 23 (2012), 2003–2010.
37. O'Sullivan, A.M., O'Grady, M.N., O'Callaghan, Y.C., Smyth, T.J., O'Brien, N.M., Kerry, J.P., Seaweed extracts as potential functional ingredients in yogurt. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 37 (2016), 293–299.
38. Pagès, J., Recueil direct de distances sensorielles: Application à l’évaluation de dix vins blancs du val-de-loire. Sciences des Aliments 23 (2003), 679–688.
39. Pagès, J., Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the loire valley. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005), 642–649.
40. Pawar, R.S., Krynitsky, A.J., Rader, J.I., Sweeteners from plants - with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (swingle). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 405 (2013), 4397–4407.
41. Philippe, R.N., De Mey, M., Anderson, J., Ajikumar, P.K., Biotechnological production of natural zero-calorie sweeteners. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 26 (2014), 155–161.
42. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the tds curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 450–455.
43. Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Vietoris, V., Sensomaker: A tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciencia E Agrotecnologia 37 (2013), 199–201.
44. Pinheiro, M.V.S., Oliveira, M.N., Penna, A.L.B., Tamime, A.Y., The effect of different sweeteners in low-calorie yogurts — a review. International Journal of Dairy Technology 58 (2005), 193–199.
45. Reinbach, H.C., Giacalone, D., Ribeiro, L.M., Bredie, W.L., Frøst, M.B., Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping®. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 160–166.
46. Reis, R.C., Minim, V.P., Bolini, H.M.A., Dias, B.R., Minim, L.A., Ceresino, E.B., Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. Journal of Food Quality 34 (2011), 163–170.
47. Rocha, I.F.O., Bolini, H.M.A., Different sweeteners in passion fruit juice: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. LWT-Food Science and Technology 62 (2015), 861–867.
48. Rocha, R.A.R., Ribeiro, M.N., Silva, G.A., Rocha, L.C.R., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., et al. Temporal profile of flavor enhancers MAG, MSG, GMP, and IMP, and their ability to enhance salty taste, in different reductions of sodium chloride. Journal of Food Science 85 (2020), 1565–1575.
49. Rodrigues, J.F., Andrade, R.S., Bastos, S.C., Coelho, S.B., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Miracle fruit: An alternative sugar substitute in sour beverages. Appetite 107 (2016), 645–653.
50. Rodrigues, J.F., de Souza, V.R., Lima, R.R., Carneiro, J.D.D.S., Nunes, C.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) panel behavior: A preliminary study with chocolate. Food Quality and Preference 54 (2016), 51–57.
51. Saba, A., Sinesio, F., Moneta, E., Dinnella, C., Laureati, M., Torri, L., et al. Measuring consumers attitudes towards health and taste and their association with food-related life-styles and preferences. Food Quality and Preference 73 (2019), 25–37.
52. Saint-Eve, A., Leclercq, H., Berthelo, S., Saulnier, B., Oettgen, W., Delarue, J., How much sugar do consumers add to plain yogurts? Insights from a study examining French consumer behavior and self-reported habits. Appetite 99 (2016), 277–284.
53. Santos, F.G., Fratelli, C., Muniz, D.G., Capriles, V.D., Mixture design applied to the development of chickpea-based gluten-free bread with attractive technological, sensory, and nutritional quality. Journal of Food Science 83 (2018), 188–197.
54. Shangguan, S., Afshin, A., Shulkin, M., Ma, W., Marsden, D., Smith, J., et al. A meta-analysis of food labeling effects on consumer diet behaviors and industry practices. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 56 (2019), 300–314.
55. Shankar, P., Ahuja, S., Sriram, K., Non-nutritive sweeteners: Review and update. Nutrition 29 (2013), 1293–1299.
56. Shanock, L.R., Baran, B.E., Gentry, W.A., Pattison, S.C., Heggestad, E.D., Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology 25 (2010), 543–554.
57. Souza, V.R., Pereira, P.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Bolini, H.M.A., Borges, S.V., Queiroz, F., Analysis of various sweeteners in low-sugar mixed fruit jam: Equivalent sweetness, time-intensity analysis and acceptance test. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 48 (2013), 1541–1548.
58. Souza, V.R., Pereira, P.A.P., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Silva, T.L.T., Borges, S.V., et al. Multivariate approaches for optimization of the acceptance: Optimization of a Brazilian cerrado fruit jam using mixture design and parallel factor analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 27 (2012), 417–424.
59. Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Varela, P., Ares, G., Stability of sample configurations from projective mapping: How many consumers are necessary?. Food Quality and Preference 34 (2014), 79–87.
60. Vidigal, M.C., Minim, V.P., Simiqueli, A.A., Souza, P.H., Balbino, D.F., Minim, L.A., Food technology neophobia and consumer attitudes toward foods produced by new and conventional technologies: A case study in Brazil. LWT-Food Science and Technology 60 (2015), 832–840.
61. Wai, W.W., Alkarkhi, A.F., Easa, A.M., Optimization of pectin extraction from durian rind (Durio zibethinus) using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science 74 (2009), C637–C641.
62. Wakeling, I.N., MacFie, H.J., Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Quality and Preference 6 (1995), 299–308.
63. Whalen, C.A., Gilmore, T.M., Spurgeon, K.R., Parsons, J.G., Yogurt manufactured from whey-caseinate blends and hydrolyzed lactose. Journal of Dairy Science 71 (1988), 299–305.
64. Wise, P.M., Nattress, L., Flammer, L.J., Beauchamp, G.K., Reduced dietary intake of simple sugars alters perceived sweet taste intensity but not perceived pleasantness. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 103 (2015), 50–60.
65. Yang, X., Lu, Y., Hu, G., Optimization of sweetener formulation in sugar-free yoghurt using response surface methodology. CyTA - Journal of Food 12 (2014), 121–126.