Multivariate Approaches for Optimization of the Acceptance: Optimization of a Brazilian Cerrado Fruit Jam Using Mixture Design and Parallel Factor Analysis

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 417-424

  de Souza, Vanessa Rios ^a   Pereira, Patrícia Aparecida Pimenta ^a   Pinheiro, Ana Carla Marques ^a   Nunes, Cleiton Antônio ^a   Silva, Thais Lomônaco Teodoro ^a   Borges, Soraia Vilela ^a   Queiroz, Fabiana ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAZILIAN CERRADO; CERRADO; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; MIXTURE DESIGN; MULTIVARIATE APPROACH; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS; POTENTIAL FORMULATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

FACTOR ANALYSIS; FRUITS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

OPTIMIZATION;

ANNONA MURICATA; PASSIFLORA EDULIS;

EID: 84870728880     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abdullah, A. and Cheng, T.C. 2001. Optimization of reduced calorie tropical mixed fruits jam. Food Qual. Prefer. 12, 63-68.
2. Acosta, O., Víquez, F. and Cubero, E. 2008. Optimization of low calorie mixed fruit jelly by response surface methodology. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 79-85.
3. Almeida, M.M.B., Souza, P.H.M., Arriaga, A.M.C., Prado, G.M.P., Magalhães, C.E.C., Mais, G.A.M. and Lemos, T.L.G. 2011. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh exotic fruits from northeastern Brazil. Food Res. Int. 44, 2155-2159.
4. AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1998. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th Ed., Vol. 2, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
5. Arcia, P.L., Costell, E. and Tárrega, A. 2011. Inulin blend as prebiotic and fat replacer in dairy desserts: Optimization by response surface methodology. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 2192-2200.
6. Bro, R. 1997. PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 38, 149-171.
7. Bro, R. and Kiers, H.A.L. 2003. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. J. Chemometrics 17, 274-286.
8. Bro, R., Qannari, E.M., Kiers, H.A.L., Naes, T. and Frost, M.B. 2008. Multi-way models for sensory profiling data. J. Chemometrics 22, 36-45.
9. Cardoso, L.M., Martino, H.S.D., Moreita, A.V.B., Ribeiro, S.M.R. and Sant'ana, H.M.P. 2011. Cagaita (Eugenia dysenterica DC.) of the Cerrado of Minas Gerais, Brazil: Physical and chemical characterization, carotenoids and vitamins. Food Res. Int. 44, 2151-2154.
10. Chu, C.A. and Resurreccion, A.V.A. 2004. Optimization of a chocolate peanut spread using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Sensory Studies 19, 237-260.
11. Chu, C.A. and Resurreccion, A.V.A. 2005. Sensory profiling and characterization of chocolate peanut spread using response surface methodology. J. Sensory Studies 20, 243-274.
12. Cocchi, M., Bro, R., Durante, C., Manzini, D., Marchetti, A., Saccani, F., Sighinolfi, S. and Ulrici, A. 2006. Analysis of sensory data of Aceto Balsamico Tradizionale di Modena (ABTM) of different ageing by application of PARAFAC models. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 419-428.
13. Cornell, J.A. 1983. Experiment with Mixtures: Design, Models and Analysis of Mixtures Data, John Wiley, New York, NY.
14. Cruz, A.G., Cadena, R.S., Faria, J.A.F., Bolini, H.A.B., Dantas, C., Ferreira, M.M.C. and Deliza, R. 2012. PARAFAC: Adjustment for modeling consumer study covering probiotic and conventional yogurt. Food Res. Int. 45, 211-215.
15. Dean, A.M. and Voss, D.T. 1999. Design and Analysis of Experiments, Springer, New York, NY.
16. De Ketelaere, B., Goos, P. and Brijs, K. 2011. Prespecified factor level combination in the optimal design of mixture-process variable experiments. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 661-670.
17. Deshpande, R.P., Chinnan, M.S. and Mcwatters, K.H. 2008. Optimization of a chocolate-flavored, peanut-soy beverage using response surface methodology (RSM) as applied to consumer acceptability data. Food Sci. Technol. 41, 1485-1492.
18. Dische, Z. 1962. General color reactions. In Carbohydrate Chemistry ( R.L. Whistler and M.L. Wolfram, eds.) pp. 477-512, Academic Press, New York, NY.
19. Dooley, L., Threlfall, R.T. and Meullenet, J.F. 2012. Optimization of blended wine quality through maximization of consumer liking. Food Qual. Prefer. 24, 40-47.
20. Dutcosky, S.D., Grossmann, M.V.E., Silva, R.S.S.F. and Welsch, A.K. 2006. Combined sensory optimization of a prebiotic cereal product using multicomponent mixture experiments. Food Chem. 98, 630-638.
21. Ekpong, A., Ngarmsak, T. and Winger, R.J. 2006. Comparing sensory methods for the optimization of mango gel snacks. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 622-628.
22. Felberg, I., Deliza, R., Farah, A., Calado, E. and Donangelo, C.M. 2010. Formulation of a soy-coffee beverage by response surface methodology and internal preference mapping. J. Sensory Studies 25, 226-242.
23. Granato, D., Ribeiro, J.C.B., Castro, I.A. and Masson, M.L. 2010. Sensory evaluation and physicochemical optimization of soy-based desserts using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 121, 899-906.
24. Hare, L.B. 1974. Mixture designs applied to food formulation. Food Technol. 28, 50-62.
25. Henika, R.G. 1982. Use of response surface methodology in sensory evaluation. Food Technol. 36, 96-101.
26. IAL - Instituto Adolfo Lutz. 2005. Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Instituto, São Paulo, Brazil.
27. Iop, S.C.F., Silva, R.S.F. and Beleia, A.P. 1999. Formulation and evaluation of dry dessert mix containing sweetener combinations using mixture response methodology. Food Chem. 66, 167-171.
28. Karaman, S., Yilmaz, M.T. and Kayacier, A. 2011. Simplex lattice mixture design approach on the rheological behavior of glucomannan based salep-honey drink mixtures: An optimization study based on the sensory properties. Food Hydrocolloids 25, 1319-1326.
29. Kumar, S.B., Ravi, R. and Sarawathi, G. 2010. Optimization of fruit punch using mixture design. J. Food Sci. 75, S1-S7.
30. Lagrange, V. and Norback, J.P. 1987. Product optimization and the acceptor set size. J. Sensory Studies 2, 119-136.
31. Marchi, R., Mcdaniel, M.R. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2009. Formulating a new passion fruit juice beverage with different sweetener systems. J. Sensory Studies 24, 698-711.
32. Mattietto, R.A., Lopes, A.S. and Menezes, H.C. 2010. Caracterização física e físico-química dos frutos da cajazeira (Spondias mombin L.) e de duas polpas obtidas por dois tipos de extrator. Braz. J. Food Technol. 13, 156-164.
33. Meullenet, J.-F., Xiong, R. and Findlay, C. 2007. Multivariate and Probabilistic Analyses of Sensory Science Problems, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
34. Monaco, R.D., Miele, N.A., Cavella, S. and Mais, P. 2010. New chestnut-based chips optimization: Effects of ingredients. Food Sci. Technol. 43, 126-132.
35. Mondragón-Bernal, O., Rodrigues, M.I., Bolini, H.M.A. and Maugeri, F. 2010. Optimization of synbiotic fermented food from hydrosoluble soy extract applying experimental design and sensory analysis techniques. J. Sensory Studies 25, 371-389.
36. Moskowitz, H.R. 1994. Product optimization. In Measurement of Food Preferences ( H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) pp. 97-136, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, U.K.
37. Neto, B.B., Scarminio, I.S. and Bruns, R.E. 2003. Como Fazer Experimentos. Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento na Ciência e na Indústria, Editora Unicamp, Campinas, Brazil.
38. Nikzade, V., Tehrani, M.M. and Tarzjan, M.S. 2012. Optimization of low-cholesterol-low-fat mayonnaise formulation: Effect of using soy milk and some stabilizer by a mixture design approach. Food Hydrocolloids 28, 344-352.
39. Nunes, C.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M. and Bastos, S.C. 2011. Evaluating consumer acceptance tests by three-way internal preference mapping obtained by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). J. Sens. Stud. 26, 167-174.
40. Ovejero-López, L., Bro, R. and Bred, W.L.P. 2005. Univariate and multivariate modelling of flavour release in chewing gum using time-intensity: A comparison of data analytical methods. Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 327-343.
41. Plaehn, D. 2009. A variation on external preference mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 427-439.
42. Shih, M.-C., Yang, K.-T. and Kuo, S.-T. 2009. Optimization process of black soybean natto using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. 74, M294-M301.
43. Siefarth, C., Tyapkova, O., Beauchamp, J., Schweiggert, U., Buettner, A. and Bader, S. 2011. Mixture design approach as a tool to study in vitro flavor release and viscosity interactions in sugar free polyol and bulking agent solutions. Food Res. Int. 44, 3202-3211.
44. Soukoulis, C. and Tzia, C. 2010. Response surface mapping of the sensory characteristics and acceptability of chocolate ice cream containing alternate sweetening agents. J. Sensory Studies 25, 50-75.
45. Souza, V.R., Pereira, P.A.P., Queiroz, F., Borges, S.V. and Carneiro, J.D.S. 2012. Determination of bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and chemical composition of Cerrado Brazilian fruits. Food Chem. 134, 381-386.
46. Stone, H.S. and Sidel, J.L. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
47. Wai, W.W., Alkarkhi, A.F.M. and Easa, A.M. 2009. Optimization of pectin extraction from durian rind (Durio zibethinus) using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. 74, C637-C641.
48. Wakeling, I.N. and Macfie, H.J.H. 1995. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Qual. Prefer. 6, 299-308.
49. Youn, K.-S. and Chung, H.-S. 2012. Optimization of the roasting temperature and time for preparation of coffee-like maize beverage using the response surface methodology. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 305-310.
50. Zotarelli, M.F., Zanatta, C.L. and Clemente, E. 2008. Avaliação de geléias mistas de goiaba emaracujá. Revista Ceres 55, 562-567.