Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) panel behavior: A preliminary study with chocolate

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 51-57

  Rodrigues, Jéssica Ferreira ^a   Souza, Vanessa Rios de ^a   Lima, Renato Ribeiro ^a   Carneiro, João de Deus Souza ^a   Nunes, Cleiton Antônio ^a   Pinheiro, Ana Carla Marques ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Chocolate; Consumers; Familiarization stage; Panel behavior; Selection stage; TDS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978040275     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Albert, A., Salvador, A., Schlich, P., Fiszman, S., Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference 24 (2012), 111–118.
2. Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M., Roessler, E.B., Principles of sensory evaluation of food. 1965, Academic Press, New York.
3. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B...., Castura, J.C., Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Research International 78 (2015), 148–158.
4. Blake, A.A., Flavour perception and the learning of food preference. Taylor, A.J., Roberts, D.D., (eds.) Flavour perception, 2004, Blackwell, Oxford, 172–202.
5. Charles, M., Romano, A., Yener, S., Barnabà, M., Navarini, L., Märk, T.D., Gasperi, F., Understanding flavour perception of espresso coffee by the combination of a dynamic sensory method and in-vivo nosespace analysis. Food Research International 69 (2015), 9–20.
6. Delarue, J., Sieffermann, J.M., Sensory mapping using Flash Profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004), 383–392.
7. Déléris, I., Saint-Eve, A., Dakowski, F., Sémon, E., Le Quéré, J.L., Guillemin, H., et al. The dynamics of aroma release during consumption of candies of different structures, and relationship with temporal perception. Food Chemistry 127 (2011), 1615–1624.
8. Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van Delft, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M.A.J.S., Stieger, M., Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi-solid food gels: Part 1: Comparison between QDA, progressive profiling and TDS. Food Hydrocolloids 43 (2015), 207–217.
9. Di Monaco, R., Su, C., Mais, P., Cavella, S., Temporal dominance of sensations: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 38:2 (2014), 104–112.
10. Diaz, R.M.R., Suuronen, J.P., Deegan, K.C., Serimaa, R., Tuorila, H., Jouppila, K., Physical and sensory characteristics of corn-based extruded snacks containing amaranth, quinoa and kañiwa flour. LWT – Food Science and Technology 64 (2015), 1047–1056.
11. Dinnella, C., Masi, C., Zoboli, G., Monteleone, E., Sensory functionality of extra-virgin olive oil in vegetable foods assessed by temporal dominance of sensations and descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 26 (2012), 141–150.
12. Galmarini, M.V., et al. Advances in representation and analysis of mono and multi-intake Temporal Dominance of Sensations data. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 2016, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.01.011.
13. Goupil de Bouille, A., Pineau, N., Meyners, M., Martin, N., Schlich, P., How do panelists use the list of attributes during a temporal dominance of sensations experiment?. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23–26, 2010, 2010, Academy School, Afragola (Na), 179–186.
14. Hutchings, S.C., Foster, K.D., Grigor, J.M.V., Bronlund, J.E., Morgenstern, M.P., Temporal dominance of sensations: A comparison between younger and older subjects for the perception of food texture. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 106–115.
15. ISO 8586, Sensory analysis. General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors, 2012, International Organization for Standardization.
16. Labbe, D., Schlich, P., Pineau, N., Gilbert, F., Martin, N., Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: a comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 216–221.
17. Lenfant, F., Loret, C., Pineau, N., Hartmann, C., Martin, N., Perception of oral food breakdown. The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 52 (2009), 659–667.
18. Lepage, M., Neville, T., Rytz, A., Schlich, P., Martin, N., Pineau, N., Panel performance for Temporal Dominance of Sensations. Food Quality and Preference 38 (2014), 24–29.
19. Ma, Q., Hamid, N., Oey, I., Kantono, K., Faridnia, F., Yoo, M., et al. Effect of chilled and freezing pre-treatments prior to pulsed electric field processing on volatile profile and sensory attributes of cooked lamb meats. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2016 [in press].
20. Macfie, H.J., Bratchell, N., Greenhoff, K., Vallis, L.V., Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 4 (1989), 129–148.
21. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G.V., Carr, B.T., Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed., 1999, CRC, Boca Raton, 390p.
22. Meillon, S., Urbano, C., Schlich, P., Contribution of the Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 20:7 (2009), 490–499.
23. Meillon, S., Viala, D., Urbano, C., Guillot, G., Schlich, P., Impact of partial alcohol reduction in Syrah wine on perceived complexity and temporality of sensations and link with preference. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 732–740.
24. Meyners, M., On the design, analysis and interpretation of temporal dominance of sensations data. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23–26, 2010, 2010, Academy School, Afragola (Na), 45–53.
25. Moskowitz, H.R., Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods: marketing and R & D approaches. 1983, Westport, Food & Nutrition Press, 605.
26. Ng, M., Lawlor, J.B., Chandra, S., Chaya, C., Hewson, L., Hort, J., Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 25:2 (2012), 121–134.
27. Nunes, C.A., Chemoface (ufla.br/chemoface), 2012.
28. Nunes, C.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Sensomaker. Version 1.8. 2012, UFLA, Software, Lavras.
29. Paulsen, M.T., Nys, A., Kvarberg, R., Hersleth, M., Effects of NaCl substitution on the sensory properties of sausages: Temporal aspects. Meat Science 98 (2014), 164–170.
30. Pineau, N., Bouillé, A.G., Lepage, M., Lenfant, F., Schlich, P., Martin, N., et al. Temporal Dominance of Sensations: What is a good attribute list?. Food Quality and Preference, 26, 2012, 159-16.
31. Pineau, N., Cordelle, S., Schlich, P., Temporal dominance of sensations: A new technique to record several sensory attributes simultaneously over time. Abstract book of 5th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Boston, MA, USA, July, 2003, 121.
32. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Koster, E., Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 450–455.
33. Rodrigues, J.F., Condino, J.P.F., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Temporal dominance of sensations of chocolate bars with different cocoa contents: Multivariate approaches to assess TDS profiles. Food Quality and Preference 47 (2016), 91–96.
34. Rodrigues, J.F., Goncalves, C.S., Pereira, R.C., Carneiro, J.D.S., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Utilization of temporal dominance of sensations and time intensity methodology for development of low-sodium Mozzarella cheese using a mixture of salts. Journal of Dairy Science 97 (2014), 4733–4744.
35. Rodrigues, J.F., Junqueira, G., Goncalves, C.S., Carneiro, J.D.S., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Elaboration of garlic and salt spice with reduced sodium intake. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2014.
36. Rodrigues, D.M., Souza, V.R., Mendes, J.F., Nunes, C.A., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Microparticulated salts mix: an alternative to reducing sodium in shoestring potatoes. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft + Technologie/Food Science + Technology 69 (2016), 390–399.
37. Rosenthal, A.J., Share, C., Temporal Dominance of Sensations of peanuts and peanut products in relation to Hutchings and Lillford's “breakdown path”. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 311–316.
38. Silva, T.L.T., Souza, V.R., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Freire, T.V.M., Equivalence salting and temporal dominance of sensations analysis for different sodium chloride substitutes in cream cheese. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 67(1), 2013.
39. Sokolowsky, M., Fischer, U., Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 732 (2012), 46–52.
40. Souza, V.R., Marques, T.V., Goncalves, C.S., Carneiro, J.D.S., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A., Salt equivalence and temporal dominance of sensations of different sodium chloride substitutes in butter. Joural of Dairy Research, 1–7, 2013, 10.1017/S0022029913000204.
41. Thomas, A., Visalli, M., Cordelle, S., Schlich, P., Temporal drivers of liking. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 365–375.
42. Veinand, B., Godefroy, C., Adam, C., Delarue, J., Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 22 (2011), 474–485.
43. Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Medina, K., Boido, E., Ares, G., Dynamic characterization of red wine astringency: Case study with Uruguayan Tannat wines. Food Research International 82 (2016), 128–135.
44. Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference. 36 (2014), 135–143.