Correction to: Development of Children’s monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format (Metacognition and Learning, (2020), 15, 1, (3-27), 10.1007/s11409-019-09208-5);Development of Children’s monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2020, Pages 3-27

  Steiner, Martina ^a   van Loon, Mariëtte H ^a   Bayard, Natalie S ^a   Roebers, Claudia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Control; Development; Monitoring; Stability; Test format

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073949741     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-019-09218-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (64)

1. August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 39–53. 10.2307/747650.
2. Björnsson, C. H. (1983). Readability of newspapers in 11 languages. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(4), 480–497. 10.2307/747382.
3. Buratti, S., Allwood, C. M., & Johansson, M. (2014). Stability in the metamemory realism of eyewitness confidence judgments. Cognitive Processing, 15(1), 39–53. 10.1007/s10339-013-0576-y.
4. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.
5. Cartelli, A. (2012). Current trends and future practices for digital literacy and competence. Hershey, PH: IGI Global.
6. Chedzoy, O. B. (2006). Phi-Coefficient. In Phi-coefficient. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. http://flowjo.typepad.com/the_daily_dongle/files/Phi-coefficient.pdf.
7. Coffman, J. L., Ornstein, P. A., McCall, L. E., & Curran, P. J. (2008). Linking teachers' memory-relevant language and the development of children's memory skills. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1640–1654. 10.1037/a0013859.
8. De Bruin, A. B., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 294–310. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.005.
9. De Carvalho Filho, M. K. (2009). Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests. International Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 93–108. 10.1080/00207590701436744.
10. Destan, N., Hembacher, E., Ghetti, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5-to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 213–228. 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.04.001.
11. Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, 466–503. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.003.0029.
12. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003.
13. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47(2), 274–296. 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90033-7.
14. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self-evaluations undermine students` learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22, 271–280. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003.
15. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2013). Four cornerstones of calibration research: Why understanding students’ judgments can improve their achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58–61. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.002.
16. Engelen, J. A., Camp, G., van de Pol, J., & de Bruin, A. B. (2018). Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension: Can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy? Metacognition and Learning, 13(3), 287–307. 10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4.
17. Ferrer, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., Serrano, M. Á., & Gilabert, R. (2017). Impact of text availability and question format on reading comprehension processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 404–415. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.002.
18. Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1338–1349. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417.
19. Grammer, J., Coffman, J. L., & Ornstein, P. (2013). The effect of teachers' memory-relevant language on children's strategy use and knowledge. Child Development, 84(6), 1989–2002. 10.1111/cdev.12100.
20. Hembacher, E., & Ghetti, S. (2013). How to bet on a memory: Developmental linkages between subjective recollection and decision making. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 436–452. 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.010.
21. Jonsson, A. C., & Allwood, C. M. (2003). Stability and variability in the realism of confidence judgments over time, content domain, and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 559–574. 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00028-4.
22. Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 157–171. 10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3.
23. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. 10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349.
24. Koriat, A., & Ackerman, R. (2010). Choice latency as a cue for children’s subjective confidence in the correctness of their answers. Developmental Science, 13(3), 441–453. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00907.x.
25. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: Insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 1–17). Boston, MA: Springer.
26. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children’s strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 325–340. 10.1348/000709910X485719.
27. Little, J. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text. Memory & Cognition, 43(1), 85–98. 10.3758/s13421-014-0453-7.
28. Llorens, A. C., Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2014). Adaptive formative feedback to improve strategic search decisions in task-oriented reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 233–251. 10.1111/jcal.12050.
29. Magliano, J. P., Millis, K., Ozurub, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies (pp. 107–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002.
31. Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643–655. 10.2307/1128929.
32. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2013). Metacognition and control of study choice in children. Metacognition and Learning, 8(1), 19–46. 10.1007/s11409-013-9094-7.
33. Moss, B. (2005). Making a case and a place for effective content area literacy instruction in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 46–55. 10.1598/RT.59.1.5.
34. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109.
35. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5.
36. Ozuru, Y., Briner, S., Kurby, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 67(3), 215–227. 10.1037/a0032918.
37. Pannu, J. K., & Kaszniak, A. W. (2005). Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: A review. Neuropsychology Review, 15(3), 105–130. 10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6.
38. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., Ghatala, E. S., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Test monitoring in young grade school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43(1), 96–111. 10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6.
39. Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., & Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 232–249. 10.2307/748004.
40. Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Explicit and implicit confidence judgments and developmental differences in metamemory: An eye-tracking approach. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 299–250. 10.1007/s11409-010-9059-z.
41. Roebers, C. M. (2006). Developmental progression in children’s strategic memory regulation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 193–200. 10.1024/1421-0185.65.3.193.
42. Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: Developmental progression in the impact of test format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(4), 352–371. 10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00076-6.
43. Roebers, C. M., & Spiess, M. (2017). The development of metacognitive monitoring and control in second graders: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 110–128. 10.1080/15248372.2016.1157079.
44. Roebers, C. M., Von der Linden, N., & Howie, P. (2007). Favourable and unfavourable conditions for children’s confidence judgments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 109–134. 10.1348/026151006X104392.
45. Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C., & Roderer, T. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children’s test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 749–767. 10.1348/978185409X429842.
46. Roebers, C. M., Mayer, B., Bayard, N. S., Steiner, M., & Van Loon, M. H. (2019). The role of children’s metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology.
47. Rohwer, M., Kloo, D., & Perner, J. (2012). Escape from metaignorance: How children develop an understanding of their own lack of knowledge. Child Development, 83(6), 1869–1883. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01830.
48. Schneider, W. (1998). Performance prediction in young children: Effects of skill, metacognition and wishful thinking. Developmental Science, 1(2), 291–297. 10.1111/1467-7687.00044.
49. Schneider, W., & Löffler, E. (2016). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Metamemory (pp. 491–518). Oxford University Press.
50. Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3.
51. Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1996). Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 971–986. 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00130-4.
52. Thiede, K. W. (1996). The relative importance of anticipated test format and anticipated test difficulty on performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(4), 901–918. 10.1080/713755673.
53. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 290–302. 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.290.
54. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 85–106). New York: Taylor & Francis.
55. Thiede, K. W., Redford, J. S., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2012). Elementary school experience with comprehension testing may influence metacomprehension accuracy among seventh and eighth graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 554–564. 10.1037/a0028660.
56. Thiede, K. W., Redford, J. S., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2017). How restudy decisions affect overall comprehension for seventh-grade students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 590–605. 10.1111/bjep.12166.
57. Thompson, W. B., & Mason, S. E. (1996). Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 24(2), 226–234. 10.3758/BF03200883.
58. Van Loon, M. H., & Roebers, C. M. (2017). Effects of feedback on self-evaluations and self-regulation in elementary school. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(5), 508–519. 10.1002/acp.3347.
59. Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2014). Can students evaluate their understanding of cause-and-effect relations? The effects of diagram completion on monitoring accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 151, 143–154. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.007.
60. Van Loon, M. H., Dunlosky, J., Van Gog, T., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & De Bruin, A. B. (2015). Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 39–48. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.003.
61. Van Loon, M., de Bruin, A., Leppink, J., & Roebers, C. (2017). Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 77–94. 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.008.
62. Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817–826. 10.1037/a0020062.
63. Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653–678. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100348.
64. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441–517. 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.