A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 33-45

  Schraw, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Bias; Metacognitive monitoring; Other measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849124050     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agresti, A. (1984). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley.
2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
3. C. M. Allwood A. C. Jonsson P. A. Granhag 2005 The effects of source and type of feedback on child witnesses' metamemory accuracy Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 331 344 doi:10.1002/acp.1071
4. L. Bol D. Hacker P. O'Shea D. Allen 2005 The influence of overt practice, achievement level, and explanatory style on calibration accuracy and performance Journal of Experimental Education 73 269 290 doi:10.3200/JEXE.73.4. 269-290
5. K. A. Burson R. P. Larrick J. Klayman 2006 Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: Perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 60 77 doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.60
6. D. Butler P. Winne 1995 Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis Review of Educational Research 65 245 281
7. L. T. Connor J. Dunlosky C. Hertzog 1997 Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy Psychology and Aging 12 50 71 doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.50
8. M. R. P. Dougherty A. Sprenger 2006 The influence of improper sets of information of judgment: How irrelevant information can bias judged probability Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 135 262 281 doi:10.1037/0096-3445. 135.2.262
9. J. Dunlosky K. A. Rawson E. L. Middleton 2005 What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate- monitoring and accessibility hypothesis Journal of Memory and Language 52 551 565 doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.011
10. J. C. Dunn 2004 Remember-know: A matter of confidence Psychological Review 111 524 542 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524
11. J. H. Flavell 1979 Metacognition and cognitive monitoring The American Psychologist 34 906 911 doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
12. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Vail, & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 220-241). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
13. A. Gillstrom J. Ronnberg 1995 Comprehension calibration and recall prediction accuracy of texts: Reading skill, reading strategies, and effort Journal of Educational Psychology 87 545 558 doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.545
14. A. M. Glenberg W. Epstein 1987 Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition 15 1 84 93
15. L. A. Goodman W. H. Kruskal 1954 Measures of association for cross classification Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 732 764 doi:10.2307/2281536
16. P. Juslin N. Olsson A. Winman 1996 Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness testimony: comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 1304 1316 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1304
17. W. L. Keleman P. J. Frost C. A. Weaver 2000 Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability Memory & Cognition 28 92 107
18. G. Keren 1991 Calibration and probability judgments: conceptual and methodological issues Acta Psychologica 77 217 273 doi:10.1016/0001-6918(91) 90036-Y
19. A. Koriat L. Sheffer H. Ma'ayan 2002 Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased overconfidence with practice Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 131 147 162 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.147
20. L. M. Lin K. M. Zabrucky 1998 Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction Contemporary Educational Psychology 23 345 391 doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0972
21. R. H. Maki M. Shields A. E. Wheeler T. L. Zacchilli 2005 Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy Journal of Educational Psychology 97 723 731 doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.723
22. McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 79-102). Hoboken: Wiley.
23. T. O. Nelson 1996 Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not the absolute performance on an individual item: comments on Schraw (1995) Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 257 260
24. T. O. Nelson L. Narens J. Dunlosky 2004 A revised methodology for research in metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM) Psychological Methods 9 53 69 doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53
25. J. L. Nietfeld L. Cao J. W. Osborne 2005 Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom Journal of Experimental Education 74 7 28
26. J. L. Nietfeld C. K. Enders G. Schraw 2006 A Monte Carlo comparison of measures of relative and absolute monitoring accuracy Educational and Psychological Measurement 66 258 271 doi:10.1177/0013164404273945
27. Osterlind, S. J. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, practice, and applications of mental appraisal. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
28. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
29. F. J. Prins M. V. J. Veenman J. J. Elshout 2006 The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory Learning and Instruction 16 374 387 doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.008
30. Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. London: Wadsworth.
31. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and the ends. In P. Alexander, & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 349-367, 2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.
32. Siegel, S., & Castellan Jr., N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. C. Souchay M. Isingrini D. Clarys L. Taconnat F. Eustache 2004 Executive functioning and judgment-of-learning versus feeling-of-knowing in older adults Experimental Aging Research 30 47 62 doi:10.1080/03610730490251478
34. L. Stankov 1998 Calibration curves, scatterplots, and the distinction between general knowledge and perceptual tasks Learning and Individual Differences 10 104 120 doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80141-1
35. N. Stewart G. D. Brown N. Chater 2005 Absolute identification by relative judgment Psychological Review 112 881 911 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.881
36. K. W. Thiede M. C. Anderson 2003 Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 129 160 doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
37. K. W. Thiede J. Dunlosky D. Griffin J. Wiley 2005 Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 1267 1280 doi:10.1037/0278-7393. 31.6.1267
38. W. B. Thompson 1999 Individual differences in memory monitoring accuracy Learning and Individual Differences 11 365 376 doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80009-0
39. W. B. Thompson S. E. Mason 1996 Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance Memory & Cognition 94 226 234
40. M. V. J. Veenman B. H. A. Van Hout-Walters P. Afflerbach 2006 Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations Metacognition and Learning 1 3 14 doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
41. T. S. Wallsten 1996 Commentary: an analysis of judgment research analyses Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65 220 226 doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0022
42. T. S. Wallsten H. Gu 2003 Distinguishing choice and subjective probability estimation processes: implications for theories of judgment and for cross-cultural comparisons Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes 90 111 123 doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00513-7
43. C. A. Weaver 1990 Constraining factors in the calibration of comprehension Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 214 222 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.214
44. B. White J. Frederiksen 2005 A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development Educational Psychologist 40 211 223 doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004-3
45. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
46. D. B. Wright 1996 Measuring feeling of knowing: comment on Schraw (1995) Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 261 268
47. J. F. Yates 1988 Analyzing the accuracy of probability judgments for multiple events: an extension of the covariance decomposition Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41 281 299 doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90031- 3
48. Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.