Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension: can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy?

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 287-307

  Engelen, Jan A A ^a,b   Camp, Gino ^a   van de Pol, Janneke ^c   de Bruin, Anique B H ^d  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cue diagnosticity; Keyword generation; Metacognitive monitoring; Reading comprehension; Self regulated learning; Teacher judgments

Indexed keywords

EID: 85058213407     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18–32
2. Anderson, M. C., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? ActaPsychologica, 128(1), 110–118
3. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444
4. Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562–577
5. Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G., & Monteiro, K. P. (1981). Selectivity of learning caused by affective states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 451–473
6. Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–979
7. De Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 294–310
8. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296
9. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249–275). Mahwah: Erlbaum
10. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 374–380
11. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25
12. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 702–718
13. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 732–764
14. Goossens, N. A. M. C., Camp, G., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Tabbers, H. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2014). The benefit of retrieval practice over elaborative restudy in primary school vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 177–182
15. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 163–189
16. Helmke, A., & Schrader, F. W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgement accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 91–98
17. Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: a review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 297–313
18. Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (1998). Teachers’ ability to estimate item difficulty: a test of the assumptions in the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(1), 69–81
19. Kaiser, J., Möller, J., Helm, F., & Kunter, M. (2015). Das Schülerinventar: Welche Schülermerkmale die Leistungsurteile von Lehrkräften beeinflussen. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(2), 279–302
20. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 918–929
21. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370
22. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: Insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer
23. Marr, M. B., & Gormley, K. (1982). Children's recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 89–104
24. Masur, E. F., McIntyre, C. W., & Flavell, J. H. (1973). Developmental changes in apportionment of study time among items in a multi trial free recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 237–246
25. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288
26. McNeish, D. M., & Kelley, K. (2018). Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations. Psychological Methods
27. McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: a review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295–314
28. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2013). Metacognition and control of study choice in children. Metacognition and Learning, 8(1), 19–46
29. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 463–477
30. Morris, C. C. (1990). Retrieval processes underlying confidence in comprehension judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 223–232
31. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–270
32. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning andMotivation, 26, 125–141
33. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5(4), 207–213
34. Oudman, S., Van de Pol, J., Bakker, A., Moerbeek, M., & Van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of different cue types on the accuracy of primary school teachers' judgments of students' mathematical understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 214–226
35. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 69–80
36. Rawson, K. A., O’Neil, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 288–302
37. Redford, J. S., Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2011). Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22, 262–270
38. Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., & Howie, P. (2007). Favourable and unfavourable conditions for children's confidence judgments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 109–134
39. Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T. O. (2000). Developmental trends in children’s memory monitoring: evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115–134
40. Shanks, L. L., & Serra, M. J. (2014). Domain familiarity as a cue for judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 445–453
41. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students' academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762
42. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 129–160
43. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73
44. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1267–1280
45. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. (2010). Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 331–362
46. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2011). Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 264–273
47. Thiede, K. W., Redford, J. S., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2012). Elementary school experience with comprehension testing may influence metacomprehension accuracy among seventh and eighth graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 554–564
48. Thiede, K. W., Brendefur, J. L., Osguthorpe, R. D., Carney, M. B., Bremner, A., Strother, S., Oswalt, S., Snow, J. L., Sutton, J., & Jesse, D. (2015). Can teachers accurately predict student performance? Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 36–44
49. Thomas, A. K., & Mcdaniel, M. A. (2007). Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 212–218
50. Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 832–842
51. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction. Learning andInstruction, 21(1), 46–57
52. Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2014). Can students evaluate their understanding of cause-and-effect relations? The effects of diagram completion on monitoring accuracy. ActaPsychologica, 151, 143–154