How restudy decisions affect overall comprehension for seventh-grade students

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 590-605

  Thiede, Keith W ^a   Redford, Joshua S ^b   Wiley, Jennifer ^c   Griffin, Thomas D ^c  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

allocation of study; comprehension; metacomprehension; self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE; SELF CONTROL; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); SCIENCE; SELF-CONTROL; STUDENTS;

EID: 85021024450     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: 20448279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12166     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory and Cognition, 41, 416–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4
2. Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015928
3. Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033572
4. Begg, I. M., Martin, L. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90016-8
5. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170684
6. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
7. de Bruin, A., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. R. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.005
8. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(89)90033-7
9. Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 54, pp. 103–140). San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00004-8
10. Dunlosky, J., & Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 25, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211311
11. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1997). Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multi-trial learning. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52b.4.p178
12. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
13. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.702
14. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross-classification. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281536
15. Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 37, 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.1001
16. Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 36, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.93
17. Jaeger, A. J., & Wiley, J. (2015). Reading an analogy can cause the illusion of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 52, 376–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1026679
18. Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.663
19. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
20. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
21. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
22. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x
23. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
24. Rawson, K. A., O'Neil, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 228–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024749
25. Redford, J. S., Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2012). Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.007
26. Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021705
27. Roelle, J., Schmidt, E. M., Buchau, A., & Berthold, K. (2017). Effects of informing learners about the dangers of overconfident judgments of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000132
28. Shiu, L., & Chen, Q. (2013). Self and external monitoring of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029378
29. Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2008). Research on the allocation of study time: Studies from 1890 to the present (and beyond). In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 333–351). Hillsdale, MI: Psychology Press.
30. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.204
31. Sussan, D., & Son, L. K. (2014). Breakdown in the metacognitive chain: Good intentions aren't enough in high school. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.006
32. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
33. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
34. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024
35. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1267
36. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T., & Wiley, J. (2011). Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X510494
37. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2010). Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959927
38. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition and self-regulated learning (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
39. th graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028660
40. Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.002
41. Wiley, J., Griffin, T., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408–428. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.132.4.408-428
42. Wiley, J., Thiede, K. W., & Griffin, T. D. (2016). Improving metacomprehension with the situation-model approach. In K. Mokhtari (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading instruction for first and second language readers (pp. 93–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
43. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). New York, NY: Academic Press.