Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research

Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Rafaeli, Sheizaf ^a   Ariel, Yaron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Information; Interactivity; Meaning; New Media; Value

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066534421     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Ahern, R. K. and Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). The interaction effect: an experimental study of high and low interactivity political websites. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
2. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A. and Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing 61(3), 38-53.
3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Fine, A. and Goldstein, A. (2004). The impact of Internet interactivity and need for closure on consumer preference. Computers in Human Behavior 20(1), 103-117.
4. Brady, L. (2004). The role of interactivity on the effectiveness of an educational science website for middle school students. Unpublished dissertation. Wichita State University.
5. Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B. and Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 38(4), 23-32.
6. Bucy, E. P. (2004a). Interactivity in society: locating an elusive concept. Information Society 20(5), 373-383.
7. Bucy, E. P. (2004b). The interactivity paradox: closer to the news but confused. In E. P. Bucy and J. E. Newhagen (eds), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 47-72). Mahwah, NJ: Bucy, E. P.O.
8. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A. et al. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16(6), 553-574.
9. Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 116-131.
10. Cohen, J. (2002). Deconstructing Ally: explaining viewers' different interpretations of popular television. Media Psychology 4, 253-277.
11. Cho, C-H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 21(1), 33-50.
12. Cho, C-H. and Leckenby, J. D. (1999). Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness. In M. S. Roberts (ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 162-179). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
13. Coyle, J. R. and Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in Web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising 30(3), 65-79.
14. Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32(5), 554-570.
15. Dozier, D. C. (2004). Interactivity, social constructivism and satisfaction with distance learning among infantry soldiers. Unpublished dissertation. Auburn University.
16. Downes, E. J. and McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: a qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society 2(2), 157-179.
17. Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M. L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 743-757). Newbury Park, CA: Durlak, J. T.0.
18. Dyson, E. (1993). Interactivity means 'active' participation. Computerworld 27(50), 33-34.
19. Ghose, S. and Dou, W. Y. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of Internet presence sites. Journal of Advertising Research 38(2), 29-43.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Ha, L. and James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42(4), 457-474.
22. Haeckel, S. H. (1998). About the nature and future of interactive marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 12(1), 63-71.
23. Hackman, M. Z. and Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: the effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education 39, 196-206.
24. Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(1). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://www.jiad.org/vol1/no1/heeter
25. Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J. and Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education 8(2), 30-42.
26. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing July, 50-68.
27. Hoerner, J. (1999). Scaling the web: a parasocial interaction scale for World Wide Web sites. In D. W. Schumann and E. Thorson (eds), Advertising and the World Wide Web (pp. 135-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Horton D. and Wohl, RR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19(3), 215-229.
29. Hong, S. (2003). The impacts of the levels of interactivity, vividness and motivation on telepresence and revisiting intention in the new media. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
30. Houlberg, R. (1984). Local television news audience and the para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting 28, 423-429.
31. Huang, H-Y. (2003). Effects of interactivity and expressiveness on perceived social presence, memory and persuasion in interactive health communications. Unpublished dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
32. Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity: tracing a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review 19(1), 185-204.
33. Jee, J. and Lee, W. N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: an exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising 3(1). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://jiad.org/vol3/no1/jee/index.htm
34. Jones, Q., Ravid, G. and Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research 15(2), 194-210.
35. Kayany, J. M., Wotring, C. E. and Forrest, E. J. (1996). Relational control and interactive media choice in technology-mediated communication situations. Human Communication Research 22(3), 399-421.
36. Kiousis, S. (1999). Broadening the boundaries of interactivity: a concept explication. Paper read at Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, August, at New Orleans, LA.
37. Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media and Society 4(3), 355-383.
38. Leary, T. (1990). The interpersonal, interactive, interdimensional interface. In B. Laurel (ed.), The art of human-computer interface design. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
39. Leckenby, J. D. and Li, H. (2000). From the Editors: why we need the Journal of Interactive Advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(1). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://www.jiad.org/vol1/no1/editors/index.html
40. Lee, J. Lee, W. N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: an exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Adevertising 3(1). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://Jiad.org/vol3/no1/jee/index.htm
41. Lee, J-S. (2000). Interactivity: a new approach paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, AZ.
42. Liaw, S-S. and Huang, H-M. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: a review of the literature. Educational Technology 40(3), 41-45.
43. Lieb, T. (1998). Inactivity on interactivity. Journal of Electronic Publishing 3(3). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-03/lieb0303.html
44. Liu, Y. P. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research 43(2), 207-216.
45. Liu, Y. P. and Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 31(4), 53-64.
46. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
47. Lombard, M. and Snyder-Dutch, J. (2001). Interactive advertising and presence: a framework. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(2). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://www.jiad.org/vol1/no2/lombard/index.htm
48. Macias, W. (2000). The effects of interactivity on comprehension and persuasion of interactive advertising. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Advertising, The University of Texas at Austin.
49. Macias, W. (2003). A preliminary structural equation model of comprehension and persuasion of interactive advertising brand web sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 3(2). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://www.jiad.org/vol3/no2/macias/index.htm
50. MacLean, R. L. (2004). Measuring and improving interactivity in an asynchronous learning network. Unpublished dissertation. The Claremont Graduate University.
51. Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L. and Willis, J. W. (1997). Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow's technologies, 2nd edn). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
52. Markus, M. L. (1990). Toward a 'critical mass' theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk and C. Steinfeld (eds), Organization and communication technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Massey, B. L. and Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism and English-language web newspapers in Asia. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76(1), 138-151.
55. McMillan, S. J. (1998). Who pays for content? Funding in interactive media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(1). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html
56. McMillan, S. J. (2002). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: users, documents, systems. In S. J. McMillan and L. Lievrouw, The handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 163-182). London: Sage.
57. McMillan, S. J. and Downes, E. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: a qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society 2(2), 157-179.
58. McMillan, S. J. and Hwang J-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31(3), 14-29.
59. Miles, Ian (1992). When mediation is the message: how suppliers envisage new markets. In M. Lea (ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 145-167). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
60. Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2), 1-7.
61. Mundorf, N. and Bryant, J. (2002). Realizing the social and commercial potential of interactive technologies. Journal of Business Research 55, 665-670.
62. Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York: The Free Press.
63. Newhagen, J. E. (2004). Interactivity, dynamic symbol processing and the emergence of content in human communication. Information Society 20(5), 395-400.
64. Newhagen, J. E., Cordes, J. W. and Levy, M. R. (1996). Nightly@Nbc.Com: audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the internet. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 164-175.
65. Neuman, W. R. (1991). The future of the mass audience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
66. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
67. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L. and Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Marketing Science 19(1), 22-42.
68. Osgood, C. E. (1954). Psycholinguists: a survey of theory and research problems. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49. Morton Prince Memorial Supplemental.
69. Pavlik, J. V. (1998). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
70. Perse, E. M. (1990). Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 34, 17-36.
71. Rafaeli, S. (1985). Interacting with media: Para-social interaction and real interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
72. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: from new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann and S. Pingree (eds), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Rafaeli, S. (1990). Interacting with media: para-social interaction and real interaction. In B. D. Ruben and L. A. Lievrouw (eds), Mediation, information and communication: Information and behavior, vol. 3 (pp. 125-181). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
74. Rafaeli, S. (2004). Constructs in the storm. In M. Consalvo, N. Baym, J. Hunsinger, K. B. Jensen, J. Logie, M. Murero and L. R. Shade (eds), Internet research annual, volume 1 (pp. 55-65). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
75. Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(4). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
76. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Rice, R. E. (1984). New media technology: growth and integration. In R. E. Rice (ed.), The new media: Communication, research and technology (pp. 33-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
78. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.
79. Rust, R. T. and Varki, S. (1996). Rising from the ashes of advertising. Journal of Business Research 37, 173-181.
80. Samsup, J. and Yungwook, K. (2003). The effect of web characteristics on relationship building. Journal of Public Relations Research 15(3), 199.
81. Schultz, T. (2000). Mass media and the concept of interactivity: an exploratory study of online forums and reader email. Media, Culture and Society 22(2), 205-221.
82. Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In W. Schramm (ed.), The process and effects of mass communiction (pp. 3-26). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
83. Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1947). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
84. Shin, M. (1998). Promoting student's self-regulation ability: guidelines for instructional design. Educational Technology 38(1), 38-44.
85. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons.
86. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32(11), 1492-1512.
87. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in a network organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Sohn, D. and Leckenby, J. D. (2002). Social dimensions of interactive advertising. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Jacksonville, Florida, March.
89. Sohn, D., Leckenby, J. D. and Jee, J. (2003). Expected interactivity the role of expected interactivity in interactive ad processing. Annual Conference American Academy of Advertising, Denver-Broomfield, Colorado.
90. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.
91. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication 50(4), 111-132.
92. Stromer-Galley, J. and Foot, K. A. (2000). Citizens, campaigns and online interactivity. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
93. Stewart, D. W. and Pavlou, P. A. (2002). From consumer response to active consumer: measuring the effectiveness of interactive media. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30(Fall), 376-396.
94. Sukpanich, N. and Chen, L. (2000). Interactivity as the driving force behind e-commerce. Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (pp. 834-836), California.
95. Sukpanich, N. (2004). Machine interactivity and person interactivity: the driving forces behind influences on consumers willingness to purchase online. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Memphis.
96. Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity's effects. Information Society 20(5): 385-389.
97. Sundar, S. S. and Kim, J. (2004). Interactivity and persuasion: influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Paper presented to the Communication and Technology division at the 54th annual convention of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
98. Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S. and Brown J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity-impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research 30(1), 30-59.
99. Teo, H. H., Oh, L. B., et al. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(3), 281-305.
100. Van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media, L. Spoorenberg (Trans.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
101. Wang, T-L. (2000). The effects of interactivity on Web campaigning in Taiwan's 2000 presidential election. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
102. Warnick, B., Xenos, M., Endres, D. and Gastil, J. (2005). Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(3). URL (Retrieved June 2005): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/warnick.html
103. Webster, D. M. and Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 261-271.
104. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or, control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.
105. Williams, F., Rice, R. and Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.
106. Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website. Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising annual conference, Albuquerque, NM.
107. Wu, G. (2000). The role of perceived interactivity in interactive ad processing. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
108. Yin, J. (2002). Interactivity of Internet-based communications: impacts on e-business consumer decisions. Unpublished dissertation. Georgia State University.
109. Yoo, C. Y. and Stout, P. A. (2001). Factors affecting users' interactivity with the web site and the consequences of users' interactivity. In C. R. Taylor (ed.), Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 53-60). Villanova, PA: Villanova University.
110. Yu, Y-L. (2004). The impact of perceived interactivity and vividness of video games on customer buying behavior. Unpublished dissertation. Lynn University.
111. Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction and presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1(1), 127-132.