Networked interactivity

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1997, Pages

  Rafaeli, Sheizaf ^a,c   Sudweeks, Fay ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; CORRELATION METHODS; DATA TRANSFER; ITERATIVE METHODS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION (CMC); INTERACTIVE MESSAGES; MASS COMMUNICATION; SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS;

INTERNET;

EID: 0003327603     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Allbritton, M. M. 1996. Collaborative Communication among Researchers using Computer-Mediated Communication: A Study of ProjectH. Masters Thesis, Department of Communication, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, available at http://www.arch.usvd.edu.au/~fay/netplay/marcel/index.html.
2. Beniger, J. R. 1987. Personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo community. Communication Research, 14: 352-371.
3. Blackman, B. I., and Clevenger, T. 1990. On-line computer messaging: Surrogates for non-verbal behavior. Paper presented at the 1990 annual conference of ICA, Dublin, Ireland.
4. Bretz, R. & Schmidbauer, M. 1983. Media for Interactive Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Carey, J. 1980. Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia.
7. Culnan, M. J. and Markus, M. L. 1987. Information technologies. In Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, eds F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, and L. W. Porter, 420-443. Newbury Park: Sage.
8. Danowski, J. A. and Edison-Swift, P. 1985. Crisis effects on intraorganizational computer-based communication, Communication Research, 12(2): 251-270.
9. Dennis, A. R. and Valacich, J. S. 1993. Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4): 531-537.
10. Duck, S. 1976. Interpersonal communication in developing acquintance. In Explorations in Interpersonal Communication, ed. G. R. Miller. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Finholt, T., and Sproull, L. S. 1990. Electronic groups at work, Organization Science, 1(1): 41-64.
12. Fulk, J. 1993. Social construction of communication technology. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 921-950.
13. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
14. Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Hahm, W. and Bikson, T. 1989. Retirees using email and networked computers, International Journal of Technology and Aging, 2(2): 113-123.
16. Hellerstein, L. 1989. Creating social reality with computer-mediated communication. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
17. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K. and Turoff, M. 1986. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13: 225-252.
18. Hiltz, S. R. and Johnson, K. 1989. Experiments in group decision making. 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences, Decision Support Systems, 5: 217-32.
19. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S. and Siegel, J. 1987. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5): 917-30.
20. McLaughlin, M. L. 1984. Conversation: How Talk is Organized. Sage Series in Interpersonal Communication, Vol. 3. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
21. Matheson, K. and Zanna, M. 1989. Impact of computer-mediated communication on self awareness, Computers in Human Behavior, 4: 221-233.
22. Matheson, K. and Zanna, M. P. 1990. Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me, Social Science Computer Review, 8(1): 1-12.
23. Osborn, A. F. 1953. Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.
24. Palmer, M. T. 1994. Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality, eds F. Biocca and S. Levy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Rafaeli, S. 1986. The electronic bulletin board: A computer driven mass medium, Computers and the Social Sciences, 2(3): 123-136.
26. Rafaeli, S. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication, In Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, Vol. 16, eds R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann and S. Pingree, 110-134. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Rafaeli, S. and LaRose. R. J. 1993. Electronic Bulletin Boards and "Public Goods" Explanations of collaborative mass media, Communication Research, 20(2): 177-197.
28. Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F., Konstan, J., and Mabry, E. 1994. ProjectH Technical Report, available at http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/~fay/netplay/ techreport.html or via ftp from ftp.arch.su.edu.au/pub/proiectH/papers/ techreport.txt.
29. Rice, R. E. and Associates, eds. 1984. The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, 129-156. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Rice, R. E. and Love, G. 1987. Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14:85-108.
31. Reid, E. 1991. Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet Relay Chat, Honors Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
32. Rogers, E. M. 1986. Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: The Free Press.
33. Schegloff, H.A. 1987. Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections, In The Micro-Macro Link, eds J. C. Alexander, B. Giesan, R. Much and N. J. Smalser, 207-234. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. Schegloff, E. A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of inter subjectivity in conversation, American Journal of Sociology, 97(5): 1245-1295.
35. Schmitz, J. A. and Fulk, J. 1991. Organizational colleagues, information richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18: 487-523.
36. Schudson, M. 1978. The ideal of conversation in the study of mass media. Communication Research, 5(3):320-329.
37. Sherblom, J. C. 1990. Organizational involvement expressed through pronoun use in computer mediated communication, Communication Research Reports, 7(1):45-50.
38. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
39. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V. Kiesler, S. and Maguire, T. W. 1986. Group processes in computer-mediated communication, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37(2): 57-187.
40. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. 1991. Connections: New Wavs of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Steinfield, C.W. 1986. Computer mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task related and socioemotional uses. In Communication Yearbook 9, ed. M.L. McLaughlin, 777-804. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Steinfield, C.W. 1987. Computer mediated communication systems. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, ed. M. E. Williams, 167-202.
43. Sudweeks, F. and Rafaeli, S. 1996. How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration. In Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st Century, eds T. M. Harrison and T. D. Stephens, 115-136. New York: SUNY Press.
44. Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Trevino, L.K., Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. 1990. Understanding manager's media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In Organizations and Communication Technology, eds J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, 71-94. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Valacich, J. S., Paranka, P., George, J. F., and Nunamaker, J. F. 1993. Communication concurrency and the new media. Communication Research, 20(2): 249-276.
47. Walther, J. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1): 52-89.
48. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H. & Jackson, D. D. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. NY: Norton.
49. Zack, M. H. 1993. Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups, Information Systems Research, 4: 3.