Interactivity, dynamic symbol processing, and the emergence of content in human communication

Information Society

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 395-400

  Newhagen, John E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactivity; Levels of analysis; Meaning; Neural networks; Schema; Symbols

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544240909     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240490508108     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Abbott, H. P. 2002. The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barthes, R. 1982. A. Barthes reader. New York: Hill and Wang.
3. Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York & London: Cambridge University Press.
4. Case, D. O. 2002. Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic Press/Elsevier Science.
5. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.
8. Derrida, J. 1983. Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. 1980. The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication 30:10-29.
10. Gibson, J. 1979. Ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Muffin.
11. Gilbert, D. 1991. How mental systems believe. American Psychologist 46(2):107-119.
12. Hall, S. 1980. Encoding/decoding. In Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, pp. 128-138. London: Hutchinson.
13. Hebb, D. 1949. Organization of behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Hofstadter, D. 1995. Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. New York: Basic Books.
15. Lang, A. 1990. Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research 17(3):275-299.
16. Levi-Strauss, C. 1976. Structural anthropology, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Marr, D. 1968. Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
18. Mead, G. H. 1934/1967. Mind self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Newell, A. 1990. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Norman, D. A. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
21. Pynchon, T. 1961/1999. V. New York: Perennial Classics.
22. Rafaeli, S. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, eds. R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree, pp. 110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, XXVII(3-4): 379-423; 623-656.
25. Shneiderman, B. 1998. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Steuer, J. 1995. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In Communication in the age of virtual reality, eds. F. Biocca and M. R. Levy, pp. 33-56. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Taborsky, E. 1998. Architectonics of semiosis. New York: St. Martin's.