A linear-time algorithm for gaussian and non-gaussian trait evolution models

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 397-408

  Tung Ho, Lam Si ^a   Ané, Cécile ^a,b  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84898959182     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bartoszek K., Pienaar J., Mostad P., Andersson S., Hansen T.F. 2012. A phylogenetic comparative method for studying multivariate adaptation. J. Theor. Biolog. 314:204-215.
2. Beaulieu J.M., Jhwueng D.-C., Boettiger C., O'Meara B.C. 2012. Modeling stabilizing selection: Expanding the Ornstein-Ühlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution 66:2369-2383.
3. Bininda-Emonds O., Cardillo M., Jones K.E., MacPhee R.D.E., Beck R.M.D., Grenyer R., Price S.A., Vos R.A., Gittleman J.L., Purvis A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-daymammals.Nature 446:507-512.
4. Blomberg S.P., Garland T. Jr., Ives A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
5. Boettiger C., Coop G., Ralph P. 2012. Is your phylogeny informativé measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution 66:2240-2251.
6. Brawand D., Soumillon M., Necsulea A., Julien P., Csardi G., Harrigan P., Weier M., Liechti A., Aximu-Petri A., Kircher M., Albert F.W., Zeller U., Khaitovich P., Grutzner F., Bergmann S., Nielsen R., Pääbo S., Kaessmann H. 2011. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478:343-348.
7. Butler M.A., King A.A. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695.
8. Cai X.K., Spooner D.M., Jansky S.H. 2011. A test of taxonomic and biogeographic predictivity: Resistance to potato virus Y in wild relatives of the cultivated potato. Phytopathology 101:1074-1080.
9. Cooper N., Purvis A. 2010. Body size evolution in mammals: Complexity in tempo and mode. Am. Nat. 175:727-738.
10. Cressie N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. New rev. ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
11. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. 1977.Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc., Series B 39: 1-38.
12. Eastman J.M., Alfaro M.E., Joyce P., Hipp A.L., Harmon L.J. 2011. A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees. Evolution 65:3578-3589.
13. Felsenstein J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:471-492.
14. Felsenstein J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and withinspecies variation: Contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171:713-725.
15. FitzJohn R. 2012. Diversitree: Comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:1084-1092.
16. Freckleton R. 2012. Fast likelihood calculations for comparative analyses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:940-947.
17. Freckleton R.P., Harvey P.H. 2006. Detecting non-brownian trait evolution in adaptive radiations. PLoS Biol. 4:e373.
18. Garland T. Jr., Dickerman A.W., Janis C.M., Jones J.A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
19. Garland T. Jr., Ives A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
20. Goff S.A., Vaughn M., McKay S., Lyons E., Stapleton A.E., Gessler D., Matasci N., Wang L., Hanlon M., Lenards A., Muir A., Merchant N., Lowry S., Mock S., Helmke M., Kubach A., Narro M., Hopkins N., Micklos D., Hilgert U., Gonzales M., Jordan C., Skidmore E., Dooley R., Cazes J., McLay R., Lu Z., Pasternak S., Koesterke L., Piel W.H., Grene R., Noutsos C., Gendler K., Feng X., Tang C., Lent M., Kim S.-J., Kvilekval K., Manjunath B.S., Tannen V., Stamatakis A., Sanderson M., Welch S., Cranston K., Soltis P., Soltis D., O'Meara B., An C., Brutnell T., Kleibenstein D.J., White J.W., Leebens-Mack J., Donoghue M.J., Spalding E.P., Vision T.J., Myers C.R., Lowenthal D., Enquist B.J., Boyle B., Akoglu A., Andrews G., Ram S., Ware D., Stein L., Stanzione D. 2011. The iplant collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for plant biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2.
21. Goldberger A.S. 1962. Best linear unbiased prediction in the generalized linear regression model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57: 369-375.
22. Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. Series B, Biol. Sci. 326:119-157.
23. Hadfield J. 2010.MCMCmethods formulti-response generalized linear mixed models: TheMCMCglmmRpackage. J. Stat. Software 33:1-22.
24. Hadfield J.D., Nakagawa S. 2010. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: Phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-Trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J. Evol. Biol. 23:494-508.
25. Hager W. 1989. Updating the inverse of amatrix. SIAM Rev. 31:221-239.
26. Hansen T.F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
27. Hansen T.F., Bartoszek K. 2012. Interpreting the evolutionary regression: The interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Syst. Biol. 61:413-425.
28. Harmon L.J., Losos J.B., Jonathan Davies T., Gillespie R.G., Gittleman J.L., Bryan Jennings W., Kozak K.H., McPeek M.A., Moreno-Roark F., Near T.J., Purvis A., Ricklefs R.E., Schluter D., Schulte J.A. II, Seehausen O., Sidlauskas B.L., Torres-Carvajal O., Weir J.T., Mooers A. 2010. Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385-2396.
29. Ho L.S.T., Ané C. 2013. Asymptotic theory with hierarchical autocorrelation: Ornstein-uhlenbeck tree models. Annals Stat. 41:957-981.
30. Ives A., Helmus M. 2011. Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure. Ecol. Monographs 81:511-525.
31. Ives A.R., Garland T. Jr. 2010. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst. Biol. 59:9-26.
32. Ives A.R., Midford P.E., Garland T. Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparativemethods. Syst. Biol. 56:252-270.
33. Jetz W., Thomas G., Joy J., Hartmann K., Mooers A. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444-448.
34. King A.A., Butler M.A. 2009. ouch: Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models for phylogenetic comparative hypotheses. (R package), http://ouch.rforge. r-project.org.
35. Lavergne S., Hampe A., Arroyo J. 2013. In and out of africa: How did the strait of gibraltar affect plant species migration and local diversification? J. Biogeography 40:24-36.
36. Lawson C.L., Hanson R.J. 1995. Solving Least Squares Problems. Classics in Applied Mathematics Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
37. Liang J. 2007. Linear and Generalized Linear Mixed Models and their Applications. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.
38. Lynch M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080.
39. Martins E.P., Hansen T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am.Nat. 149:646-667.
40. Motani R., Schmitz L. 2011. Phylogenetic versus functional signals in the evolution of form-function relationships in terrestrial vision. Evolution 65:2245-2257.
41. O'Meara B.C., Ané C., Sanderson M.J., Wainwright P.C. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
42. Pagel M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348.
43. Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
44. Paradis E., Claude J. 2002. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J. Theor. Biol. 218:175-185.
45. Revell L.J. 2009. Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63:3258-3268.
46. Revell L.J., Harmon L.J. 2008. Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10:311-331.
47. Revell L.J., Mahler D.L., Peres-Neto P.R., Redelings B.D. 2012. A new phylogenetic method for identifying exceptional phenotypic diversification. Evolution 66:135-146.
48. Revell L.J., Reynolds R.G. 2012. A new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation. Evolution 66:2697-2707.
49. Semple C., Steel M. 2003. Phylogenetics. No. 24 in Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications New York: Oxford University Press Smith S.A., Donoghue M.J. 2008. Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322:86-89.
50. Thomas G.H., Freckleton R.P., Székely T. 2006.Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 273:1619-1624.
51. Venditti C., Meade A., Pagel M. 2011. Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479:393-396.