Single-cell copy number variant detection reveals the dynamics and diversity of adaptation

PLoS Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2018, Pages

  Lauer, Stephanie ^a   Avecilla, Grace ^a   Spealman, Pieter ^a   Sethia, Gunjan ^a   Brandt, Nathan ^a   Levy, Sasha F ^b   Gresham, David ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMINO ACID REPEAT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA BARCODING; DUR3 GENE; GAP1 GENE; GENE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; INVERTED REPEAT; NONHUMAN; REPORTER GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA REPLICATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID TRANSPORTER; CARRIER PROTEIN; DUR3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; GAP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; AMINO ACID TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA REPLICATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENES, REPORTER; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85058887969     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000069     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Conant GC, Wolfe KH, Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9: 938–950. doi: 10.1038/nrg2482 pmid: 19015656
2. Zuellig MP, Sweigart AL, Gene duplicates cause hybrid lethality between sympatric species of Mimulus. PLoS Genet. 2018;14: e1007130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007130 pmid: 29649209
3. Shlien A, Malkin D, Copy number variations and cancer. Genome Med. 2009;1: 62–62. doi: 10.1186/gm62 pmid: 19566914
4. Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA, The cancer genome. Nature. 2009;458: 719–724. doi: 10.1038/nature07943 pmid: 19360079
5. Barreiro LB, Laval G, Quach H, Patin E, Quintana-Murci L, Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 340–345. doi: 10.1038/ng.78 pmid: 18246066
6. Iskow RC, Gokcumen O, Abyzov A, Malukiewicz J, Zhu Q, Sukumar AT, et al. Regulatory element copy number differences shape primate expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 12656–12661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205199109 pmid: 22797897
7. Clop A, Vidal O, Amills M, Copy number variation in the genomes of domestic animals. Anim Genet. 2012;43: 503–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02317.x pmid: 22497594
8. Żmieńko A, Samelak A, Kozłowski P, Figlerowicz M, Copy number polymorphism in plant genomes. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127: 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2177-7 pmid: 23989647
9. Greenblum S, Carr R, Borenstein E, Extensive strain-level copy-number variation across human gut microbiome species. Cell. 2015;160: 583–594. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.038 pmid: 25640238
10. Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer SW, A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16: 172–183. doi: 10.1038/nrg3871 pmid: 25645873
11. Ohno S., Evolution by Gene Duplication. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1970.
12. Lynch M, Conery JS, The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes. Science. 2000;290.
13. Hughes AL, The Evolution of Functionally Novel Proteins after Gene Duplication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1994;256.
14. Anderson RP, Roth JR, Tandem Genetic Duplications in Phage and Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31: 473–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.002353 pmid: 334045
15. Iantorno SA, Durrant C, Khan A, Sanders MJ, Beverley SM, Warren WC, et al. Gene Expression in Leishmania Is Regulated Predominantly by Gene Dosage. MBio. 2017;8. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01393-17 pmid: 28900023
16. Cowell AN, Istvan ES, Lukens AK, Gomez-Lorenzo MG, Vanaerschot M, Sakata-Kato T, et al. Mapping the malaria parasite druggable genome by using in vitro evolution and chemogenomics. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2018;359: 191–199.
17. Dolatabadian A, Patel DA, Edwards D, Batley J, Copy number variation and disease resistance in plants. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130: 2479–2490. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2993-2 pmid: 29043379
18. Elde NC, Child SJ, Eickbush MT, Kitzman JO, Rogers KS, Shendure J, et al. Poxviruses deploy genomic accordions to adapt rapidly against host antiviral defenses. Cell. 2012;150: 831–841. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.049 pmid: 22901812
19. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC, Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 Generations. Am Nat. 1991;138: 1315–1341.
20. Good BH, McDonald MJ, Barrick JE, Lenski RE, Desai MM, The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations. Nature. 2017;551: 45–50. doi: 10.1038/nature24287 pmid: 29045390
21. Gresham D, Dunham MJ, The enduring utility of continuous culturing in experimental evolution. Genomics. 2014;104: 399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.09.015 pmid: 25281774
22. Horiuchi T, Horiuchi S, Novick A, The genetic basis of hyper-synthesis of beta-galactosidase. Genetics. 1963;48: 157–169. pmid: 13954911
23. Sonti RV, Roth JR, Role of gene duplications in the adaptation of Salmonella typhimurium to growth on limiting carbon sources. Genetics. 1989;123: 19–28. pmid: 2680755
24. Hong J, Gresham D, Molecular specificity, convergence and constraint shape adaptive evolution in nutrient-poor environments. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004041–e1004041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004041 pmid: 24415948
25. Gresham D, Usaite R, Germann SM, Lisby M, Botstein D, Regenberg B, Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 18551–18556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014023107 pmid: 20937885
26. Payen C, Di Rienzi SC, Ong GT, Pogachar JL, Sanchez JC, Sunshine AB, et al. The dynamics of diverse segmental amplifications in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapting to strong selection. G3. 2014;4: 399–409. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.009365 pmid: 24368781
27. Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker CM, Jenq HT, Pai DA, Ward A, et al. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet. 20084: e1000303–e1000303.
28. Brown CJ, Todd KM, Rosenzweig RF, Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15: 931–942. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026009 pmid: 9718721
29. Kao KC, Sherlock G, Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 1499–1504. doi: 10.1038/ng.280 pmid: 19029899
30. Hansche PE, Gene duplication as a mechanism of genetic adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1975;79: 661–674. pmid: 236976
31. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G, Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002056–e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002056 pmid: 21552329
32. Dorsey M, Peterson C, Bray K, Paquin CE, Spontaneous amplification of the ADH4 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992;132: 943–950. pmid: 1459445
33. Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, et al. A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 9272–9277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803466105 pmid: 18583475
34. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, et al. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature. 2013;500: 571–574. doi: 10.1038/nature12344 pmid: 23873039
35. Hughes JM, Lohman BK, Deckert GE, Nichols EP, Settles M, Abdo Z, et al. The role of clonal interference in the evolutionary dynamics of plasmid-host adaptation. MBio. 2012;3: e00077–12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00077-12 pmid: 22761390
36. Maddamsetti R, Lenski RE, Barrick JE, Adaptation, Clonal Interference, and Frequency-Dependent Interactions in a Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli. Genetics. 2015; doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.176677 pmid: 25911659
37. Grenson M, Hou C, Crabeel M, Multiplicity of the amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. IV. Evidence for a general amino acid permease. J Bacteriol. 1970;103: 770–777. pmid: 5474888
38. Stanbrough M, Magasanik B, Transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of the general amino acid permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1995;177: 94–102. pmid: 7798155
39. Dhami MK, Hartwig T, Fukami T, Genetic basis of priority effects: insights from nectar yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 2016;283. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1455 pmid: 27708148
40. Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G, Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10: 551–564. doi: 10.1038/nrg2593 pmid: 19597530
41. Reams AB, Roth JR, Mechanisms of gene duplication and amplification. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7: a016592. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016592 pmid: 25646380
42. Carvalho CMB, Lupski JR, Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17: 224–238. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.25 pmid: 26924765
43. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR, Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet. 2002;18: 74–82. pmid: 11818139
44. Lee JA, Carvalho CMB, Lupski JR, A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell. 2007;131: 1235–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.037 pmid: 18160035
45. Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR, Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, et al. A Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Model for the Origin of Human Copy Number Variation. PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000327–e1000327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000327 pmid: 19180184
46. Payen C, Koszul R, Dujon B, Fischer G, Bailey JA, Eichler EE, et al. Segmental Duplications Arise from Pol32-Dependent Repair of Broken Forks through Two Alternative Replication-Based Mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 2008;4: e1000175–e1000175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000175 pmid: 18773114
47. Brewer BJ, Payen C, Raghuraman MK, Dunham MJ, Origin-dependent inverted-repeat amplification: a replication-based model for generating palindromic amplicons. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002016–e1002016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002016 pmid: 21437266
48. Brewer BJ, Payen C, Di Rienzi SC, Higgins MM, Ong G, Dunham MJ, et al. Origin-Dependent Inverted-Repeat Amplification: Tests of a Model for Inverted DNA Amplification. PLoS Genet. 2015;11: e1005699–e1005699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005699 pmid: 26700858
49. Møller HD, Parsons L, Jørgensen TS, Botstein D, Regenberg B, Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112: E3114–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508825112 pmid: 26038577
50. Turner KM, Deshpande V, Beyter D, Koga T, Rusert J, Lee C, et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature. 2017;543: 122–125. doi: 10.1038/nature21356 pmid: 28178237
51. Møller HD, Andersen KS, Regenberg B, A model for generating several adaptive phenotypes from a single genetic event: Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAP1 as a potential bet-hedging switch. Commun Integr Biol. 2013;6: e23933. doi: 10.4161/cib.23933 pmid: 23713139
52. Cohen S, Segal D, Extrachromosomal circular DNA in eukaryotes: possible involvement in the plasticity of tandem repeats. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;124: 327–338. doi: 10.1159/000218136 pmid: 19556784
53. Suzuki Y, St Onge RP, Mani R, King OD, Heilbut A, Labunskyy VM, et al. Knocking out multigene redundancies via cycles of sexual assortment and fluorescence selection. Nat Methods. 2011;8: 159–164. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1550 pmid: 21217751
54. Gruber JD, Vogel K, Kalay G, Wittkopp PJ, Contrasting properties of gene-specific regulatory, coding, and copy number mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: frequency, effects, and dominance. PLoS Genet. 2012;8: e1002497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002497 pmid: 22346762
55. Kafri M, Metzl-Raz E, Jona G, Barkai N, The Cost of Protein Production. Cell Rep. 2016;14: 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.015 pmid: 26725116
56. Steinrueck M, Guet CC, Complex chromosomal neighborhood effects determine the adaptive potential of a gene under selection. Elife. 2017;6. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25100 pmid: 28738969
57. Griesbeck O, Baird GS, Campbell RE, Zacharias DA, Tsien RY, Reducing the environmental sensitivity of yellow fluorescent protein. Mechanism and applications. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 29188–29194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102815200 pmid: 11387331
58. Airoldi EM, Miller D, Athanasiadou R, Brandt N, Abdul-Rahman F, Neymotin B, et al. Steady-state and dynamic gene expression programs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to variation in environmental nitrogen. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27: 1383–1396. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-05-1013 pmid: 26941329
59. Stanbrough M, Magasanik B, Two transcription factors, Gln3p and Nil1p, use the same GATAAG sites to activate the expression of GAP1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1996;178: 2465–2468. pmid: 8636059
60. Lang GI, Botstein D, Desai MM, Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics. 2011;188: 647–661. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.128942 pmid: 21546542
61. Ye K, Schulz MH, Long Q, Apweiler R, Ning Z, Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 2865–2871. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394 pmid: 19561018
62. Layer RM, Chiang C, Quinlan AR, Hall IM, Alkan C, Coe BP, et al. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 2014;15: R84–R84. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r84 pmid: 24970577
63. Wala J, Bandopadhayay P, Greenwald NF, O’Rourke R, Sharpe T, Stewart C, et al. SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly. Genome Res. 2018;28: 581–591. doi: 10.1101/gr.221028.117 pmid: 29535149
64. Abyzov A, Urban AE, Snyder M, Gerstein M, CNVnator: An approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 2011;21: 974–984. doi: 10.1101/gr.114876.110 pmid: 21324876
65. Cullen PJ, Sprague GF, Jr.The regulation of filamentous growth in yeast. Genetics. 2012;190: 23–49. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.127456 pmid: 22219507
66. Torres EM, Dephoure N, Panneerselvam A, Tucker CM, Whittaker CA, Gygi SP, et al. Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell. 2010;143: 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.038 pmid: 20850176
67. Payen C, Sunshine AB, Ong GT, Pogachar JL, Zhao W, Dunham MJ, High-Throughput Identification of Adaptive Mutations in Experimentally Evolved Yeast Populations. PLoS Genet. 2016;12: e1006339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006339 pmid: 27727276
68. Levy SF, Blundell JR, Venkataram S, Petrov DA, Fisher DS, Sherlock G, Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking. Nature. 2015;519: 181–186. doi: 10.1038/nature14279 pmid: 25731169
69. Zhao L, Liu Z, Levy SF, Wu S, Bartender: a fast and accurate clustering algorithm to count barcode reads. Bioinformatics. 2017; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx655 pmid: 29069318
70. Blundell JR, Schwartz K, Francois D, Fisher DS, Sherlock GJ, Levy SF, The dynamics of adaptive genetic diversity during the early stages of clonal evolution [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2017. p. 170589. doi: 10.1101/170589
71. Adler M, Anjum M, Berg OG, Andersson DI, Sandegren L, High fitness costs and instability of gene duplications reduce rates of evolution of new genes by duplication-divergence mechanisms. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31: 1526–1535. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu111 pmid: 24659815
72. Natesuntorn W, Iwami K, Matsubara Y, Sasano Y, Sugiyama M, Kaneko Y, et al. Genome-wide construction of a series of designed segmental aneuploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 12510. doi: 10.1038/srep12510 pmid: 26224198
73. Selmecki A, Forche A, Berman J, Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science. 2006;313: 367–370. doi: 10.1126/science.1128242 pmid: 16857942
74. Zhang F, Khajavi M, Connolly AM, Towne CF, Batish SD, Lupski JR, The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans. Nat Genet. 2009;41: 849–853. doi: 10.1038/ng.399 pmid: 19543269
75. Ottaviani D, LeCain M, Sheer D, The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation. Trends Genet. 2014;30: 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.01.001 pmid: 24503142
76. Arlt MF, Rajendran S, Birkeland SR, Wilson TE, Glover TW, De novo CNV formation in mouse embryonic stem cells occurs in the absence of Xrcc4-dependent nonhomologous end joining. PLoS Genet. 2012;8: e1002981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002981 pmid: 23028374
77. Sakofsky CJ, Ayyar S, Deem AK, Chung W-H, Ira G, Malkova A, Translesion Polymerases Drive Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Leading to Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements. Mol Cell. 2015;60: 860–872. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041 pmid: 26669261
78. Foster PL, Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;42: 373–397. doi: 10.1080/10409230701648494 pmid: 17917873
79. Galhardo RS, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM, Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;42: 399–435. doi: 10.1080/10409230701648502 pmid: 17917874
80. Shor E, Fox CA, Broach JR, The yeast environmental stress response regulates mutagenesis induced by proteotoxic stress. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003680 pmid: 23935537
81. Chen L, Zhou W, Zhang C, Lupski JR, Jin L, Zhang F, CNV instability associated with DNA replication dynamics: evidence for replicative mechanisms in CNV mutagenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24: 1574–1583. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu572 pmid: 25398944
82. Wilson TE, Arlt MF, Park SH, Rajendran S, Paulsen M, Ljungman M, et al. Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress. Genome Res. 2015;25: 189–200. doi: 10.1101/gr.177121.114 pmid: 25373142
83. Thomas BJ, Rothstein R, Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989;56: 619–630. pmid: 2645056
84. Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot NJ, A double-edged sword: R loops as threats to genome integrity and powerful regulators of gene expression. Genes Dev. 2014;28: 1384–1396. doi: 10.1101/gad.242990.114 pmid: 24990962
85. Aguilera A, Gaillard H, Transcription and recombination: when RNA meets DNA. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6: a016543–a016543. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016543 pmid: 25085910
86. Jack CV, Cruz C, Hull RM, Keller MA, Ralser M, Houseley J, Regulation of ribosomal DNA amplification by the TOR pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112: 9674–9679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505015112 pmid: 26195783
87. Mansisidor AR, Molinar T, JrSrivastava P, Dartis DD, Pino Delgado A, Blitzblau HG, et al. Genomic copy-number loss is rescued by self-limiting production of DNA circles. Mol Cell. 2018;72: 583–593.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.036 pmid: 30293780
88. Hull RM, Cruz C, Jack CV, Houseley J, Environmental change drives accelerated adaptation through stimulated copy number variation. PLoS Biol. 2017;15: e2001333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001333 pmid: 28654659
89. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 31–34. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.13 pmid: 17401334
90. Brauer MJ, Huttenhower C, Airoldi EM, Rosenstein R, Matese JC, Gresham D, et al. Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19: 352–367. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0779 pmid: 17959824
91. Miller AW, Befort C, Kerr EO, Dunham MJ, Design and use of multiplexed chemostat arrays. J Vis Exp. 2013; e50262. doi: 10.3791/50262 pmid: 23462663
92. Ellis B, Haaland P, Hahne F, Meur NL, Gopalakrishnan N, Spidlen J, Jiang flowCore: flowCore: Basic structures for flow cytometry data. 2016.
93. Hoffman CS, Winston F, A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57: 267–272. pmid: 3319781
94. Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM, Kishony R, et al. Inexpensive Multiplexed Library Preparation for Megabase-Sized Genomes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0128036–e0128036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128036 pmid: 26000737
95. Li H, Durbin R, Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 pmid: 20080505
96. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 pmid: 19505943
97. Jeffares DC, Jolly C, Hoti M, Speed D, Shaw L, Rallis C, et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat Commun. 2017;8: 14061. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14061 pmid: 28117401
98. Blair DC, Van Rijsbergen C.J., Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1979;30: 374–375.
99. Faust GG, Hall IM, SAMBLASTER: fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2503–2505. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu314 pmid: 24812344
100. Katoh K, Standley DM, MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30: 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 pmid: 23329690
101. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A, EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16: 276–277. pmid: 10827456
102. Baxevanis AD, Davison DB, Page RDM, Petsko GA, Stein LD, Stormo GD, Using the Velvet de novo Assembler for Short-Read Sequencing Technologies. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. p. 810.
103. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10: 421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 pmid: 20003500
104. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20: 1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110 pmid: 20644199