High-Throughput Identification of Adaptive Mutations in Experimentally Evolved Yeast Populations

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Payen, Celia ^a,b   Sunshine, Anna B ^a   Ong, Giang T ^a,c   Pogachar, Jamie L ^a,d   Zhao, Wei ^a   Dunham, Maitreya J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^c NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^d Alder Biopharmaceuticals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; GLUCOSE; PHOSPHATE; SULFATE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA BARCODING; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTIVE SWEEP; YEAST; ADAPTATION; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84994201617     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006339     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Turner TL, Stewart AD, Fields AT, Rice WR, Tarone AM, Population-based resequencing of experimentally evolved populations reveals the genetic basis of body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(3):e1001336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100133621437274
2. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, et al. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature. 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature1234423873039
3. Kvitek D, Sherlock G, Whole genome, whole population sequencing reveals that loss of signaling networks is the major adaptive strategy in a constant environment. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(11):e1003972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100397224278038
4. Hong J, Gresham D, Molecular specificity, convergence and constraint shape adaptive evolution in nutrient-poor environments. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100404124415948
5. Zhu YO, Siegal ML, Hall DW, Petrov DA, Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;2014Jun3;111(22):E2310–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132301111124847077
6. Barrick JE, Yu DS, Yoon SH, Jeong H, Oh TK, Schneider D, et al. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1243–7. doi: 10.1038/nature0848019838166
7. Lee MC, Marx CJ, Synchronous waves of failed soft sweeps in the laboratory: remarkably rampant clonal interference of alleles at a single locus. Genetics. 2013;193(3):943–52. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.14850223307898
8. Kao KC, Sherlock G, Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1499–504. doi: 10.1038/ng.28019029899
9. Tenaillon O, Rodriguez-Verdugo A, Gaut RL, McDonald P, Bennett AF, Long AD, et al. The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science. 2012;335(6067):457–61. doi: 10.1126/science.121298622282810
10. Herron MD, Doebeli M, Parallel evolutionary dynamics of adaptive diversification in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(2):e1001490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100149023431270
11. Brown CJ, Todd KM, Rosenzweig RF, Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15(8):931–42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a0260099718721
12. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, et al. Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004;364(9432):438–47. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16767-615288742
13. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, Rosenzweig F, et al. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(25):16144–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.24262479912446845
14. Blount ZD, Barrick JE, Davidson CJ, Lenski RE, Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature. 2012;489(7417):513–8. doi: 10.1038/nature1151422992527
15. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE, Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature. 1997;387(6634):703–5. 9192894
16. Gerstein AC, Lo DS, Otto SP, Parallel genetic changes and nonparallel gene-environment interactions characterize the evolution of drug resistance in yeast. Genetics. 2012;192(1):241–52. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.14262022714405
17. Chou HH, Berthet J, Marx CJ, Fast growth increases the selective advantage of a mutation arising recurrently during evolution under metal limitation. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(9):e1000652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100065219763169
18. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G, Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(4):e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100205621552329
19. Sunshine AB Payen C, Ong GT, Liachko I, Tan KM, Dunham MJ, The fitness consequences of aneuploidy are driven by condition-dependent gene effects. PLoS Biology. 2015;13(5):e1002155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100215526011532
20. Sun S, Yang F, Tan G, Costanzo M, Oughtred R, Hirschman J, et al. An extended set of yeast-based functional assays accurately identifies human disease mutations. Genome Res. 2016;26(5):670–80. doi: 10.1101/gr.192526.11526975778
21. Giaever G, Nislow C, The yeast deletion collection: a decade of functional genomics. Genetics. 2014;197(2):451–65. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.16162024939991
22. Smith AM, Heisler LE, Mellor J, Kaper F, Thompson MJ, Chee M, et al. Quantitative phenotyping via deep barcode sequencing. Genome Res. 2009;19(10):1836–42. doi: 10.1101/gr.093955.10919622793
23. Delneri D, Hoyle DC, Gkargkas K, Cross EJ, Rash B, Zeef L, et al. Identification and characterization of high-flux-control genes of yeast through competition analyses in continuous cultures. Nat Genet. 2008;40(1):113–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.4918157128
24. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, Chua G, Papp B, Kafadar K, et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell. 2006;21(3):319–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.01116455487
25. Makanae K, Kintaka R, Makino T, Kitano H, Moriya H, Identification of dosage-sensitive genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using the genetic tug-of-war method. Genome Res. 2013;23(2):300–11. doi: 10.1101/gr.146662.11223275495
26. Gelperin DM, White MA, Wilkinson ML, Kon Y, Kung LA, Wise KJ, et al. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. Genes Dev. 2005;19(23):2816–26. doi: 10.1101/gad.136210516322557
27. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 2010;327(5964):425–31. doi: 10.1126/science.118082320093466
28. Douglas AC, Smith AM, Sharifpoor S, Yan Z, Durbic T, Heisler LE, et al. Functional analysis with a barcoder yeast gene overexpression system. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2(10):1279–89. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.00340023050238
29. Ho CH, Magtanong L, Barker SL, Gresham D, Nishimura S, Natarajan P, et al. A molecular barcoded yeast ORF library enables mode-of-action analysis of bioactive compounds. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(4):369–77. doi: 10.1038/nbt.153419349972
30. Magtanong L, Ho CH, Barker SL, Jiao W, Baryshnikova A, Bahr S, et al. Dosage suppression genetic interaction networks enhance functional wiring diagrams of the cell. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(6):505–11. doi: 10.1038/nbt.185521572441
31. Tong AH, Boone C, Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;313:171–92. 16118434
32. Yan Z, Costanzo M, Heisler LE, Paw J, Kaper F, Andrews BJ, et al. Yeast Barcoders: a chemogenomic application of a universal donor-strain collection carrying bar-code identifiers. Nat Methods. 2008;5(8):719–25. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.123118622398
33. Hillenmeyer ME, Ericson E, Davis RW, Nislow C, Koller D, Giaever G, Systematic analysis of genome-wide fitness data in yeast reveals novel gene function and drug action. Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R30. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r3020226027
34. Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J, Pierce SE, Hoon S, Lee W, et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science. 2008;320(5874):362–5. doi: 10.1126/science.115002118420932
35. Suzuki Y, St Onge RP, Mani R, King OD, Heilbut A, Labunskyy VM, et al. Knocking out multigene redundancies via cycles of sexual assortment and fluorescence selection. Nat Methods. 2011;8(2):159–64. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.155021217751
36. Qian W, Ma D, Xiao C, Wang Z, Zhang J, The genomic landscape and evolutionary resolution of antagonistic pleiotropy in yeast. Cell Rep. 2012;2(5):1399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.01723103169
37. Paquin C, Adams J, Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature. 1983;302(5908):495–500. doi: 10.1038/302495a06339947
38. Otto S, The role of deleterious and beneficial mutations in the evolution of ploidy levels. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences. 1994;25.
39. Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker CM, Jenq HT, Pai DA, Ward A, et al. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(12):e1000303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100030319079573
40. Payen C, Di Rienzi SC, Ong GT, Pogachar JL, Sanchez JC, Sunshine AB, et al. The Dynamics of Diverse Segmental Amplifications in Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Adapting to Strong Selection. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4(3):399–409. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.00936524368781
41. Culotta VC, Lin SJ, Schmidt P, Klomp LW, Casareno RL, Gitlin J, Intracellular pathways of copper trafficking in yeast and humans. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;448:247–54. 10079832
42. Portnoy ME, Liu XF, Culotta VC, Saccharomyces cerevisiae expresses three functionally distinct homologues of the nramp family of metal transporters. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(21):7893–902. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.21.7893-7902.200011027260
43. Wenger JW, Piotrowski J, Nagarajan S, Chiotti K, Sherlock G, Rosenzweig F, Hunger artists: yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8):e1002202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100220221829391
44. Wray GA, The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(3):206–16. doi: 10.1038/nrg206317304246
45. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6(2):80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.1969522728672
46. Gerstein AC, Kuzmin A, Otto SP, Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates passage through Haldane's sieve for Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoing adaptation. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3819. doi: 10.1038/ncomms481924804896
47. Deutschbauer AM, Jaramillo DF, Proctor M, Kumm J, Hillenmeyer ME, Davis RW, et al. Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast. Genetics. 2005;169(4):1915–25. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.03687115716499
48. Mwenifumbo JC, Marra MA, Cancer genome-sequencing study design. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(5):321–32. doi: 10.1038/nrg344523594910
49. Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N, Functional impact bias reveals cancer drivers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(21):e169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks74322904074
50. Behjati S, Tarpey PS, Sheldon H, Martincorena I, Van Loo P, Gundem G, et al. Recurrent PTPRB and PLCG1 mutations in angiosarcoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(4):376–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.292124633157
51. Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T, Experimental analysis of molecular events during mutational periodic selections in bacterial evolution. Genetics. 2000;156(4):1493–501. 11102352
52. Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P, Kryukov GV, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature. 2013;499(7457):214–8. doi: 10.1038/nature1221323770567
53. Flick K, Chapman-Shimshoni D, Stuart D, Guaderrama M, Wittenberg C, Regulation of cell size by glucose is exerted via repression of the CLN1 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(5):2492–501. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.5.24929566870
54. Chun S, Fay JC, Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8):e1002240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100224021901107
55. Burke MK, How does adaptation sweep through the genome? Insights from long-term selection experiments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1749):5029–38. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.079922833271
56. Poelwijk FJ, Kiviet DJ, Weinreich DM, Tans SJ, Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature. 2007;445(7126):383–6. doi: 10.1038/nature0545117251971
57. Rich MS, Payen C, Rubin AF, Ong GT, Sanchez MR, Yachie N, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of the SUL1 Promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2016;203(1):191–202. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.18803726936925
58. O'Connell KF, Baker RE, Possible cross-regulation of phosphate and sulfate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992;132(1):63–73. 1398064
59. Ben-Shitrit T, Yosef N, Shemesh K, Sharan R, Ruppin E, Kupiec M, Systematic identification of gene annotation errors in the widely used yeast mutation collections. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):373–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.189022306811
60. Yaniv M, Chromatin remodeling: from transcription to cancer. Cancer genetics. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2014.03.006
61. Chung N, Jenkins G, Hannun YA, Heitman J, Obeid LM, Sphingolipids signal heat stress-induced ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(23):17229–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C00022920010764732
62. de Visser JA, Krug J, Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(7):480–90. doi: 10.1038/nrg374424913663
63. Hall DW, Mahmoudizad R, Hurd AW, Joseph SB, Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: another thousand cell generations. Genetics research. 2008;90(3):229–41. doi: 10.1017/S001667230800932418593510
64. Gerstein AC, Mutational effects depend on ploidy level: all else is not equal. Biol Lett. 2013;9(1):20120614. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.061423054913
65. Tang YC, Amon A, Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis. Cell. 2013;152(3):394–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.04323374337
66. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science. 2007;317(5840):916–24. doi: 10.1126/science.114221017702937
67. Fowler DM, Araya CL, Fleishman SJ, Kellogg EH, Stephany JJ, Baker D, et al. High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat Methods. 2010;7(9):741–6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.149220711194
68. Thompson O, Edgley M, Strasbourger P, Flibotte S, Ewing B, Adair R, et al. The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 2013;23(10):1749–62. doi: 10.1101/gr.157651.11323800452
69. Bloom-Ackermann Z, Navon S, Gingold H, Towers R, Pilpel Y, Dahan O, A comprehensive tRNA deletion library unravels the genetic architecture of the tRNA pool. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100408424453985
70. Pepin KM, Wichman HA, Variable epistatic effects between mutations at host recognition sites in phiX174 bacteriophage. Evolution. 2007;61(7):1710–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00143.x17598750
71. Elena SF, Lenski RE, Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature. 1997;390(6658):395–8. 9389477
72. Jasnos L, Korona R, Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat Genet. 2007;39(4):550–4. doi: 10.1038/ng198617322879
73. Kryazhimskiy S, Rice DP, Jerison ER, Desai MM, Microbial evolution. Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity. Science. 2014;344(6191):1519–22. doi: 10.1126/science.125093924970088
74. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science.327(5964):425–31. doi: 10.1126/science.118082320093466
75. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science. 2004;303(5659):808–13. doi: 10.1126/science.109131714764870
76. Gresham D, Usaite R, Germann SM, Lisby M, Botstein D, Regenberg B, Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(43):18551–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101402310720937885
77. Hoffman CS, Winston F, A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57(2–3):267–72. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-43319781
78. Kampstra P, Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008;28(1):1–9. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.c01
79. Teng X, Dayhoff-Brannigan M, Cheng WC, Gilbert CE, Sing CN, Diny NL, et al. Genome-wide consequences of deleting any single gene. Mol Cell. 2013;52(4):485–94. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.02624211263