Integrating Material Stock Dynamics Into Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting: Concepts, Modelling, and Global Application for 1900–2050

Ecological Economics

Volumn 156, Issue , 2019, Pages 121-133

  Wiedenhofer, D ^a   Fishman, T ^b   Lauk, C ^a   Haas, W ^a   Krausmann, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Circular economy; Dynamic material flow analysis; Economy wide material flow accounting; Monte Carlo simulations; Socio economic metabolism; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; RESOURCE USE; SIMULATION; STOCK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85053757985     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Adriaanse, A., World Resources Institute, (eds.) Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies, 1997, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
2. Akenji, L., Bengtsson, M., Bleischwitz, R., Tukker, A., Schandl, H., Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.071.
3. Altimiras-Martin, A., Analysing the structure of the economy using physical input–output tables. Econ. Syst. Res. 26 (2014), 463–485, 10.1080/09535314.2014.950637.
4. Augiseau, V., Barles, S., Studying construction materials flows and stock: a review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2016, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.002.
5. Ayres, R.U., Simonis, U.E., (eds.) Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development, 1994, United Nations University Press, Tokyo; New York.
6. Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Steger, S., Resource targets in Europe and worldwide: an overview. Resources 4 (2015), 597–620, 10.3390/resources4030597.
7. Borgonovo, E., Plischke, E., Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2016), 869–887, 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032.
8. Bornhöft, N.A., Sun, T.Y., Hilty, L.M., Nowack, B., A dynamic probabilistic material flow modeling method. Environ. Model Softw. 76 (2016), 69–80, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.012.
9. Bringezu, S., Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources. Resources 4 (2015), 25–54, 10.3390/resources4010025.
10. Bringezu, S., Potočnik, J., Schandl, H., Lu, Y., Ramaswami, A., Swilling, M., Suh, S., Multi-scale governance of sustainable natural resource use—challenges and opportunities for monitoring and institutional development at the national and global level. Sustainability, 8, 2016, 778, 10.3390/su8080778.
11. Bruel, A., Kronenberg, J., Troussier, N., Guillaume, B., Linking industrial ecology and ecological economics: a theoretical and Empirical Foundation for the circular economy: linking IE and EE: a Theoretical Foundation for CE. J. Ind. Ecol., 2018, 10.1111/jiec.12745.
12. Brunner, P.H., Rechberger, H., Handbook of Material Flow Analysis: For Environmental, Resource, and Waste Engineers. Second Edition, 2017, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
13. Cabrera Serrenho, A., Allwood, J.M., Material stock demographics: cars in Great Britain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (2016), 3002–3009, 10.1021/acs.est.5b05012.
14. Cao, Z., Shen, L., Løvik, A.N., Müller, D.B., Liu, G., Elaborating the history of our cementing societies: an in-use stock perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 10.1021/acs.est.7b03077.
15. Chen, W.-Q., Graedel, T.E., Anthropogenic cycles of the elements: a critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 8574–8586, 10.1021/es3010333.
16. Cullen, J.M., Allwood, J.M., Mapping the global flow of aluminum: from liquid aluminum to end-use goods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 3057–3064, 10.1021/es304256s.
17. Cullen, J.M., Allwood, J.M., Bambach, M.D., Mapping the global flow of steel: from steelmaking to end-use goods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 13048–13055, 10.1021/es302433p.
18. Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., Galanis, G., A stock-flow-fund ecological macroeconomic model. Ecol. Econ. 131 (2017), 191–207, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.013.
19. Daigo, I., Igarashi, Y., Matsuno, Y., Adachi, Y., Accounting for steel stock in Japan. ISIJ Int. 47 (2007), 1065–1069.
20. Daigo, I., Iwata, K., Ohkata, I., Goto, Y., Macroscopic evidence for the hibernating behavior of materials stock. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 8691–8696, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01164.
21. Dombi, M., Karcagi-Kováts, A., Tóth-Szita, K., Kuti, I., The structure of socio-economic metabolism and its drivers on household level in Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 758–767, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.220.
22. Džubur, N., Buchner, H., Laner, D., Evaluating the use of global sensitivity analysis in dynamic MFA: global sensitivity analysis in dynamic MFA. J. Ind. Ecol., 2016, 10.1111/jiec.12497.
23. Economic, U.N., Social Council, Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (Report of the Secretary - General). United Nations. 2016.
24. Eisenmenger, N., Wiedenhofer, D., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Bruckner, M., Schandl, H., Wiedmann, T.O., Lenzen, M., Tukker, A., Koning, A., Consumption-based material flow indicators — comparing six ways of calculating the Austrian raw material consumption providing six results. Ecol. Econ. 128 (2016), 177–186, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.010.
25. European Commission, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). Brussels. 2011.
26. European Commission, On a Monitoring Framework for the Circular Economy (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2018) 29 Final {SWD(2018) 17 Final}). Brussels. 2018.
27. European Commission, Measuring Progress Towards Circular Economy in the European Union – Key Indicators for a Monitoring Framework (Comission Staff Working Document No. SWD(2018) 17 final, COM(2018) 29 final), Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a Monitoring Framework for the Circular Economy. Strasbourg. 2018.
28. Eurostat, A methodological guide. Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators, 2001, Eurostat, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
29. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Weisz, H., Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Adv. Hum. Ecol. 8 (1999), 215–251.
30. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., Weisz, H., Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting: state of the art and reliability across sources. J. Ind. Ecol. 15 (2011), 855–876, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x.
31. Fishman, T., Schandl, H., Tanikawa, H., Walker, P., Krausmann, F., Accounting for the material stock of nations: accounting for the material stock of nations. J. Ind. Ecol. 18 (2014), 407–420, 10.1111/jiec.12114.
32. Fishman, T., Schandl, H., Tanikawa, H., Stochastic analysis and forecasts of the patterns of speed, acceleration, and levels of material stock accumulation in society. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 10.1021/acs.est.5b05790.
33. García-Torres, S., Kahhat, R., Santa-Cruz, S., Methodology to characterize and quantify debris generation in residential buildings after seismic events. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2017, 151–159, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.006.
34. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm?. J. Clean. Prod. 143 (2017), 757–768, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
35. Gerst, M.D., Graedel, T.E., In-use stocks of metals: status and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), 7038–7045, 10.1021/es800420p.
36. Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R., Law, K.L., Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv., 3, 2017, e1700782, 10.1126/sciadv.1700782.
37. Giljum, S., Hubacek, K., Alternative approaches of physical input–output analysis to estimate primary material inputs of production and consumption activities. Econ. Syst. Res. 16 (2004), 301–310, 10.1080/0953531042000239383.
38. Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Lieber, M., Lutter, S., Global patterns of material flows and their socio-economic and environmental implications: a MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009. Resources 3 (2014), 319–339, 10.3390/resources3010319.
39. Glöser, S., Soulier, M., Tercero Espinoza, L.A., Dynamic analysis of global copper flows. Global stocks, postconsumer material flows, recycling indicators, and uncertainty evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 6564–6572, 10.1021/es400069b.
40. Glöser-Chahoud, S., Tercero Espinoza, L., Walz, R., Faulstich, M., Taking the step towards a more dynamic view on raw material criticality: an indicator based analysis for germany and Japan. Resources, 5(4), 2016, 45.
41. Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Heinz, M., How circular is the global economy?: an assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2015), 765–777, 10.1111/jiec.12244.
42. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., Winiwarter, V., Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 21 (2004), 199–213.
43. Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, Dominik, Erb, Karl-Heinz, Görg, Christoph, Krausmann, Fridolin, The material stock–flow–service Nexus: a new approach for tackling the decoupling conundrum. Sustainability, 9, 2017, 1049, 10.3390/su9071049.
44. Hashimoto, S., Tanikawa, H., Moriguchi, Y., Framework for estimating potential wastes and secondary resources accumulated within an economy – a case study of construction minerals in Japan. Waste Manag. 29 (2009), 2859–2866, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.011.
45. Heeren, N., Hellweg, S., Tracking construction material over space and time: prospective and geo-referenced modeling of building stocks and construction material flows: tracking construction material. J. Ind. Ecol., 2018, 10.1111/jiec.12739.
46. Hertwich, E.G., Gibon, T., Bouman, E.A., Arvesen, A., Suh, S., Heath, G.A., Bergesen, J.D., Ramirez, A., Vega, M.I., Shi, L., Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 6277–6282, 10.1073/pnas.1312753111.
47. Jacobi, N., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Mayer, A., Providing an economy-wide monitoring framework for the circular economy in Austria: status quo and challenges. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 137 (2018), 156–166, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.022.
48. Kovanda, J., Total residual output flows of the economy: methodology and application in the case of the Czech Republic. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 116 (2017), 61–69, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.018.
49. Kovanda, J., Havranek, M., Hak, T., Calculation of the “net additions to stock” indicator for the Czech Republic using a direct method. J. Ind. Ecol. 11 (2007), 140–154, 10.1162/jiec.2007.1155.
50. Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.H., Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2696–2705.
51. Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Jackson, T., Material flow accounting: global material use and sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 42, 2017, 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726.
52. Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., Miatto, A., Schandl, H., Haberl, H., Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114:8 (2017), 1880–1885.
53. Krausmann, F., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: the socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Glob. Environ. Chang. 52 (2018), 131–140, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003.
54. Krook, J., Baas, L., Getting serious about mining the technosphere: a review of recent landfill mining and urban mining research. J. Clean. Prod. 55 (2013), 1–9, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.043.
55. Laner, D., Rechberger, H., Astrup, T., Systematic evaluation of uncertainty in material flow analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 18 (2014), 859–870, 10.1111/jiec.12143.
56. Lauk, C., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S., Krausmann, F., Global socioeconomic carbon stocks in long-lived products 1900–2008. Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 2012, 034023.
57. Lin, C., Liu, G., Muller, D.B., Characterizing the role of built environment stocks in human development and emission growth. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 123 (2017), 67–72, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.004.
58. Liu, G., Müller, D.B., Centennial evolution of aluminum in-use stocks on our aluminized planet. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 4882–4888, 10.1021/es305108p.
59. Lwin, C.M., Dente, S.M.R., Wang, T., Shimizu, T., Hashimoto, S., Material stock disparity and factors affecting stocked material use efficiency of sewer pipelines in Japan. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 123 (2017), 135–142, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.010.
60. Majeau-Bettez, G., Pauliuk, S., Wood, R., Bouman, E.A., Strømman, A.H., Balance issues in input–output analysis: a comment on physical inhomogeneity, aggregation bias, and coproduction. Ecol. Econ. 126 (2016), 188–197, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.017.
61. Malik, A., McBain, D., Wiedmann, T.O., Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Advancements in input-output models and indicators for consumption-based accounting: MRIO models for consumption-based accounting. J. Ind. Ecol., 2018, 10.1111/jiec.12771.
62. Martinico-Perez, M.F.G., Schandl, H., Fishman, T., Tanikawa, H., The socio-economic metabolism of an emerging economy: monitoring progress of decoupling of economic growth and environmental pressures in the Philippines. Ecol. Econ. 147 (2018), 155–166, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.012.
63. Mathews, J.A., Tan, H., Circular economy: lessons from China. Nature 531 (2016), 440–442, 10.1038/531440a.
64. Matthews, E., Amann, C., Bringezu, S., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Hüttler, W., Kleijn, R., Moriguchi, Y., Ottke, C., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., Schandl, H., Schütz, H., van der Voet, E., Weisz, H., The Weight of Nations: Material Outflows from Industrial Economies. 2000, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
65. Mayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., How countries’ resource use history matters for human well-being – an investigation of global patterns in cumulative material flows from 1950 to 2010. Ecol. Econ. 134 (2017), 1–10, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.017.
66. Mayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Nuss, P., Blengini, G.A., Measuring progress towards a circular economy - a monitoring framework for economy-wide material loop closing in the EU28. J. Ind. Ecol., 2018, 10.1111/jiec.12809 (in print).
67. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., Behrens, W.W. III, The Limits to Growth: A Report to the Club of Rome. 1972, Universe Books, New York.
68. Miatto, A., Schandl, H., Tanikawa, H., How important are realistic building lifespan assumptions for material stock and demolition waste accounts?. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 122 (2017), 143–154, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.015.
69. Miatto, A., Schandl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Tanikawa, H., Modeling material flows and stocks of the road network in the United States 1905–2015. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 127 (2017), 168–178, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.024.
70. Ministry of the Environment Japan, Annual Report on the Environment in Japan 2016. 2016, Government of Japan, Tokyo.
71. Moriguchi, Y., Hashimoto, S., Material Flow Analysis and Waste Management. Clift, R., Druckman, A., (eds.) Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, 2016, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 247–262, 10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_12.
72. Müller, D.B., Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—case study for housing in The Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 59 (2006), 142–156.
73. Müller, D.B., Wang, T., Duval, B., Patterns of iron use in societal evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), 182–188, 10.1021/es102273t.
74. Müller, D.B., Liu, G., Løvik, A.N., Modaresi, R., Pauliuk, S., Steinhoff, F.S., Brattebø, H., Carbon emissions of infrastructure development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 11739–11746, 10.1021/es402618m.
75. Müller, E., Hilty, L.M., Widmer, R., Schluep, M., Faulstich, M., Modeling metal stocks and flows: a review of dynamic material flow analysis methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 2102–2113, 10.1021/es403506a.
76. Müller, E., Hilty, L.M., Widmer, R., Schluep, M., Faulstich, M., Modeling metal stocks and flows: a review of dynamic material flow analysis methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 2102–2113, 10.1021/es403506a.
77. Nakamura, S., Kondo, Y., Waste Input-Output Analysis: Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology, Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science. 2009, Springer, Dordrecht.
78. Nguyen, R.T., Imholte, D.D., China's rare earth supply chain: illegal production, and response to new cerium demand. JOM 68 (2016), 1948–1956, 10.1007/s11837-016-1894-1.
79. Norton, J., An introduction to sensitivity assessment of simulation models. Environ. Model Softw. 69 (2015), 166–174, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.020.
80. OECD, Measuring material flows and resource productivity. The OECD Guide, Vol. 1, 2008, OECD, Paris.
81. OECD, Material resources, productivity and the environment. OECD Green Growth Studies, 2015, OECD Publishing, 10.1787/9789264190504-en.
82. O'Neill, D.W., What should be held steady in a steady-state economy?: interpreting Daly's definition at the National Level: what should be held steady in a steady-state economy?. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2015), 552–563, 10.1111/jiec.12224.
83. O'Neill, D.W., Fanning, A.L., Lamb, W.F., Steinberger, J.K., A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 1 (2018), 88–95, 10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
84. Ortlepp, R., Gruhler, K., Schiller, G., Material stocks in Germany's non-domestic buildings: a new quantification method. Build. Res. Inf., 2015, 10.1080/09613218.2016.1112096.
85. Pauliuk, S., Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 129 (2018), 81–92, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019.
86. Pauliuk, S., Hertwich, E.G., Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecol. Econ. 119 (2015), 83–93, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.012.
87. Pauliuk, S., Müller, D.B., The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 24 (2014), 132–142, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.006.
88. Pauliuk, S., Wang, T., Müller, D.B., Steel all over the world: estimating in-use stocks of iron for 200 countries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 71 (2013), 22–30, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.008.
89. Pauliuk, S., Wood, R., Hertwich, E.G., Dynamic models of fixed capital stocks and their application in industrial ecology: a dynamic model of the industrial metabolism. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2015), 104–116, 10.1111/jiec.12149.
90. Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., Hertwich, E.G., Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7 (2017), 13–20, 10.1038/nclimate3148.
91. Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J.W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D.B., Wagener, T., Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: a systematic review with practical workflow. Environ. Model Softw. 79 (2016), 214–232, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008.
92. Rauch, J.N., Global mapping of Al, Cu, Fe, and Zn in-use stocks and in-ground resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009), 18920–18925, 10.1073/pnas.0900658106.
93. Rauch, J.N., Graedel, T.E., Earth's anthrobiogeochemical copper cycle: copper cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 21, 2007, 10.1029/2006GB002850 (n/a-n/a).
94. Rauch, J.N., Pacyna, J.M., Earth's global Ag, Al, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, and Zn cycles: global metal cycles. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 23, 2009, 10.1029/2008GB003376 (n/a-n/a).
95. Reyna, J.L., Chester, M.V., The growth of urban building stock. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2014), 524–537, 10.1111/jiec.12211.
96. Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M., About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 50 (1995), 225–239, 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00099-2.
97. Sandberg, N.H., Brattebø, H., Analysis of energy and carbon flows in the future Norwegian dwelling stock. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 123–139, 10.1080/09613218.2012.655071.
98. Schaffartzik, A., Mayer, A., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Loy, C., Krausmann, F., The global metabolic transition: regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950–2010. Glob. Environ. Chang. 26 (2014), 87–97, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.013.
99. Schandl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., West, J., Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Eisenmenger, N., Geschke, A., Lieber, M., Wieland, H., Schaffartzik, A., Krausmann, F., Gierlinger, S., Hosking, K., Lenzen, M., Tanikawa, H., Miatto, A., Fishman, T., Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence: global material flows and resource productivity. J. Ind. Ecol., 2017, 10.1111/jiec.12626.
100. Schiller, G., Müller, F., Ortlepp, R., Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: metabolic evidence for a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2016, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.007.
101. Schiller, G., Müller, F., Ortlepp, R., Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: metabolic evidence for a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 123 (2017), 93–107, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.007.
102. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., Yu, X., A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. J. Clean. Prod. 42 (2013), 215–227, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020.
103. Sverdrup, H.U., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., Koca, D., Aluminium for the future: modelling the global production, market supply, demand, price and long term development of the global reserves. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 103 (2015), 139–154, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.008.
104. Takiguchi, H., Takemoto, K., Japanese 3R policies based on material flow analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 12 (2008), 792–798, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00093.x.
105. Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., Okuoka, K., Sugimoto, K., The weight of society over time and space: a comprehensive account of the construction material stock of Japan, 1945-2010. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2015), 778–791, 10.1111/jiec.12284.
106. Tisserant, A., Pauliuk, S., Merciai, S., Schmidt, J., Fry, J., Wood, R., Tukker, A., Solid waste and the circular economy: a global analysis of waste treatment and waste footprints: global analysis of solid waste and waste footprint. J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (2017), 628–640, 10.1111/jiec.12562.
107. Turner, G.M., Hoffman, R., McInnis, B.C., Poldy, F., Foran, B., A tool for strategic biophysical assessment of a national economy – the Australian stocks and flows framework. Environ. Model Softw. 26 (2011), 1134–1149, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.007.
108. UNEP, Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. 2011, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
109. UNEP, Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Assessment Report for the UNEP International Resource Panel. 2016, United Nations Environment Programme, Paris.
110. Weisz, H., Suh, S., Graedel, T.E., Industrial ecology: the role of manufactured capital in sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 6260–6264, 10.1073/pnas.1506532112.
111. Wiedenhofer, D., Steinberger, J.K., Eisenmenger, N., Haas, W., Maintenance and expansion: modeling material stocks and flows for residential buildings and transportation networks in the EU25. J. Ind. Ecol. 19 (2015), 538–551, 10.1111/jiec.12216.
112. Wiedmann, T.O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., Kanemoto, K., The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 6271–6276, 10.1073/pnas.1220362110.
113. Yang, W., Kohler, N., Simulation of the evolution of the Chinese building and infrastructure stock. Build. Res. Inf. 36 (2008), 1–19.