A stock-flow-fund ecological macroeconomic model

Ecological Economics

Volumn 131, Issue , 2017, Pages 191-207

  Dafermos, Yannis ^a   Nikolaidi, Maria ^b   Galanis, Giorgos ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Ecological macroeconomics; Finance; Laws of thermodynamics; Stock flow consistent modelling

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCE; INVESTMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84987940258     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., Rubin, J., The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Effic. 2 (2009), 411–427.
2. Barker, T., Anger, A., Chewpreecha, U., Pollitt, H., A new economics approach to modelling policies to achieve global 2020 targets for climate stabilisation. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ. 26:2 (2012), 205–221.
3. Berg, M., Hartley, B., Richters, O., A stock-flow consistent input–output model with applications to energy price shocks, interest rates, and heat emissions. New J. Phys. 17 (2015), 1–21.
4. BGR, Energy Study 2015: Reserves, Resources and Availability of Energy Resources. 2015, Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR).
5. Calel, R., Stainforth, D.A., Dietz, S., Tall tales and fat tails: the science and economics of extreme warming. Clim. Chang. 132:1 (2015), 127–141.
6. Campiglio, E., Beyond carbon pricing: the role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecol. Econ. 121 (2016), 220–230.
7. Clemens, T., Boyle, P., Popham, F., Unemployment, mortality and the problem of health related selection: evidence from the Scottish and England & Wales (ONS) longitudinal studies. ONS Health Stat. Q. 43 (2011), 7–13.
8. Dafermos, Y., Liquidity preference, uncertainty, and recession in a stock-flow consistent model. J. Post Keynesian Econ. 34:4 (2012), 749–776.
9. Daly, H.E., Farley, J., Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. 2011, Island Press, Washington DC.
10. de Bruin, K.C., Dellink, R.B., Tol, R.S.J., AD-DICE: an implementation of adaptation in the DICE model. Clim. Chang. 95:1 (2009), 63–81.
11. Dell, M., Jones, B.F., Olken, B.A., What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J. Econ. Lit. 52:3 (2014), 740–798.
12. Dietz, S., Stern, N., Endogenous growth, convexity of damage and climate risk: how Nordhaus' framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Econ. J. 125:583 (2015), 574–620.
13. EEA, Material Resources and Waste – 2012 Update: The European Environment State and Outlook 2010. 2012, EEA, Copenhagen.
14. Eyraud, L., Clements, B., Wane, A., Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Policy 60 (2013), 852–865.
15. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., Weisz, H., Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting: state of the art and reliability across sources. J. Ind. Ecol. 15:6 (2011), 855–876.
16. Fontana, G., Sawyer, M., Post-Keynesian and Kaleckian thoughts on ecological macroeconomics. Eur. J. Econ. Econ. Policies Interv. 10:2 (2013), 256–267.
17. Fontana, G., Sawyer, M., Towards post-Keynesian ecological macroeconomics. Ecol. Econ. 121 (2016), 186–195.
18. Georgescu-Roegen, N., The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Georgescu-Roegen, N., Energy analysis and economic valuation. South. Econ. J. 45:4 (1979), 1023–1058.
20. Georgescu-Roegen, N., Feasible recipes versus viable technologies. Atl. Econ. J. 12:1 (1984), 21–31.
21. Godley, W., Lavoie, M., Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. 2007, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
22. Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Heinz, M., How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 19:5 (2015), 765–777.
23. Jackson, T., Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. 2009, Routledge, UK and USA.
24. Jackson, T., Victor, P.A., Does credit create a ‘growth imperative’? A quasi-stationary economy with interest-bearing debt. Ecol. Econ. 120 (2015), 32–48.
25. Kjellstrom, T., Kovats, R.S., Lloyd, S.J., Holt, T., Tol, R.S.J., The direct impact of climate change on regional labor productivity. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 64:4 (2009), 217–227.
26. Kronenberg, T., Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1488–1494.
27. Kurz, H.D., Salvadori, N., Fund-flow versus flow-flow in production theory: reflections on Georgescu-Roegen's contribution. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 51:4 (2003), 487–505.
28. Lavoie, M., Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. 2014, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
29. Mayumi, K., The Origins of Ecological Economics: The Bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen. 2001, Routledge, UK and USA.
30. Mearman, A., Recent developments in Post Keynesian methodology and their relevance for understanding environmental issues. Holt, R.P.F., Pressman, S., Spash, C.L., (eds.) Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues, 2009, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
31. Misra, V., Pandey, S.D., Hazardous waste, impact on health and environment for development of better waste management strategies in future in India. Environ. Int. 31:3 (2005), 417–431.
32. Moyer, E.J., Woolley, M.D., Matteson, N.J., Glotter, M.J., Weisbach, D.A., Climate impacts on economic growth as drivers of uncertainty in the social cost of carbon. J. Leg. Stud. 43:2 (2014), 401–425.
33. Naqvi, A., Modeling growth, distribution, and the environment in a stock-flow consistent framework. Working Paper Institute for Ecological Economics No. 2015/02, 2015.
34. Nikolaidi, M., Margins of safety and instability in a macrodynamic model with Minskyan insights. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 31 (2014), 1–16.
35. Nordhaus, W., Sztorc, P., DICE 2013R: introduction and user's manual. http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/documents/DICE_Manual_103113r2.pdf, 2013.
36. Rezai, A., Stagl, S., Ecological macroeconomics: introduction and review. Ecol. Econ. 121 (2016), 181–185.
37. Rezai, A., Taylor, L., Mechler, R., Ecological macroeconomics: an application to climate change. Ecol. Econ. 85 (2013), 69–76.
38. Ryoo, S., Skott, P., Financialization in Kaleckian economies with and without labor constraints. Eur. J. Econ. Econ. Policies Interv. 5:2 (2008), 357–386.
39. Stern, N., The structure of economic modeling of the potential impacts of climate change: grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. J. Econ. Lit. 51:3 (2013), 838–859.
40. Taylor, L., Rezai, A., Foley, D.K., An integrated approach to climate change, income distribution, employment, and economic growth. Ecol. Econ. 121 (2016), 196–205.
41. Toll, R.S.J., Climate, development and malaria: an application of FUND. Working Paper FNU No. 16, 2002.
42. UNEP, Estimating long-run geological stocks of metals. UNEP Working Paper April 6, 2011.
43. United Nations, System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 Central Framework. 2014, United Nations, New York.
44. United Nations, World Population Prospects: Key Findings and Advance Tables. 2015, United Nations, New York.
45. Victor, P.A., Growth, degrowth and climate change: a scenario analysis. Ecol. Econ. 84 (2012), 206–212.
46. Victor, P.A., Rosenbluth, G., Managing without growth. Ecol. Econ. 61 (2007), 492–504.
47. Weitzman, M.L., GHG targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages. J. Public Econ. Theory 14:2 (2012), 221–244.