Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring Framework for Economy-wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 62-76

  Mayer, Andreas ^a   Haas, Willi ^a   Wiedenhofer, Dominik ^a   Krausmann, Fridolin ^a   Nuss, Philip ^b   Blengini, Gian Andrea ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b German Environment Agency   (Germany)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

circular economy; environmental pressures; industrial ecology; recycling; secondary materials; waste management

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; RECYCLING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

BIOPHYSICAL ASSESSMENTS; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURES; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL FLOW ACCOUNTINGS; MONITORING FRAMEWORKS; OFFICIAL STATISTICS; SECONDARY MATERIALS;

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; EUROPEAN UNION; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; RECYCLING; RESOURCE USE; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85053755624     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12809     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Akenji, L., M. Bengtsson, R. Bleischwitz, A. Tukker, and H. Schandl. 2016. Ossified materialism: Introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 132(Supplement C). Absolute Reductions in Material Throughput, Energy Use and Emissions: 1–12.
2. Augiseau, V. and S. Barles. 2017. Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 123: 153–164.
3. Ayres, R.U. and B. Warr. 2009. The economic growth engine: How energy and work drive material prosperity. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
4. Behera, M., S.K. Bhattacharyya, A.K. Minocha, R. Deoliya, and S. Maiti. 2014. Recycled aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete—A breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: A review. Construction and Building Materials 68: 501–516.
5. Berglund, C. and P. Söderholm. 2003. An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environmental and Resource Economics 26(3): 429–456.
6. Beukering, P.J. van. 2013. Recycling, international trade and the environment: An empirical analysis. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, March 9.
7. BIO by Deloitte. 2015. Study on data for a raw material system analysis: Roadmap and test of the fully operational MSA for raw materials. Prepared for the European Commission. DG GROW. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/jrc/msa/images/msa_final_report.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2018.
8. Bleischwitz, Raimund, Holger Hoff, Catalina Spatar, Ester van derVoet, and Stacy VanDeveer, eds. 2018. Routledge handbook of the resource nexus. Routledge. www.beck-shop.de/Bleischwitz-Hoff-Spataru-Routledge-Handbook-of-Resource-Nexus/productview.aspx?product=18971823. Accessed January 5, 2017.
9. Bocken, N.M.P., E.A. Olivetti, J.M. Cullen, J. Potting, and R. Lifset. 2017a. Taking the circularity to the next level: A special issue on the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21: 476–482.
10. Bocken, N.M.P., P. Ritala, and P. Huotari. 2017b. The circular economy: Exploring the introduction of the concept among S&P 500 firms. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3): 487–490.
11. Braungart, M., W. McDonough, and A. Bollinger. 2007. Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions—a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(13–14): 1337–1348.
12. Bringezu, S. 2015. Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources. Resources 4(1): 25–54.
13. Brooks, A.L., S. Wang, and J.R. Jambeck. 2018. The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances 4(6): eaat0131.
14. BSI. 2017. BS 8001:2017. Framework for implementing the principles of the circular economy in organizations—Guide. London: The British Standards Institution. www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/standards/benefits-of-using-standards/becoming-more-sustainable-with-standards/BS8001-Circular-Economy/. Accessed April 9, 2018.
15. Ciacci, L., B.K. Reck, N.T. Nassar, and T.E. Graedel. 2015. Lost by design. Environmental Science & Technology 49(16): 9443–9451.
16. Cleveland, C.J., R.K. Kaufman, and D.I. Stern. 2000. Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy. Ecological Economics 32(2): 301–317.
17. COM. 2017. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/implementation_report.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2017.
18. Cullen, J.M. 2017. Circular economy: Theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine? Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3): 483–486.
19. Cullen, J.M. and J.M. Allwood. 2013. Mapping the global flow of aluminum: From liquid aluminum to end-use goods. Environmental Science & Technology 47(7): 3057–3064.
20. Dawson, C.J. and J. Hilton. 2011. Fertiliser availability in a resource-limited world: Production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy 36: S14–S22.
21. EASAC, ed. 2016. Indicators for a circular economy. EASAC policy report 30. Halle (Saale), Germany: EASAC Secretariat, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
22. Ekins, P. 2002. Economic growth and environmental sustainability: The prospects for green growth. London and New York: Routledge, January 4.
23. Erb, K.-H., T. Kastner, C. Plutzar, A.L.S. Bais, N. Carvalhais, T. Fetzel, S. Gingrich., et al. 2017. Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass. Nature. www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature25138. Accessed December 25, 2017.
24. European Commission. 2010. Critical raw materials for the EU: Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/eip-raw-materials/en/community/document/critical-raw-materials-eu-report-ad-hoc-working-group-defining-critical-raw. Accessed August 14, 2018.
25. European Commission. 2018. Circular economy—Implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm. Accessed January 17, 2018.
26. European Commission and Eurostat. 2013. Manual on waste statistics: A handbook for data collection on waste generation and treatment. Luxembourg: Publications Office. http://dx.publications.europa.eu/10.2785/4198. Accessed March 15, 2017.
27. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2006. EUR-Lex - 32006L0021 - EN - EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/21/oj. Accessed June 24, 2018.
28. Eurostat. 2017a. Material flow accounts in raw material equivalents - modelling estimates [env_ac_rme]. Eurostat: Statistics explained—Abbreviations. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Category:Abbreviations. Accessed May 29, 2017.
29. Eurostat. 2017b. Waste generation and treatment (env_wastrt). October 17. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_wastrt&lang=en. Accessed August 14, 2018.
30. Eurostat. 2017c. Material flow accounts (env_ac_mfa). October 17. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ac_mfa&lang=en. Accessed August 14, 2018.
31. Eurostat. 2018. Eurostat—Statistics explained. Circular economy. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/material-flow-diagram. Accessed August 14, 2018.
32. Fargione, J., J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky, and P. Hawthorne. 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867): 1235–1238.
33. Fischer-Kowalski, M., F. Krausmann, S. Giljum, S. Lutter, A. Mayer, S. Bringezu, Y. Moriguchi, H. Schütz, H. Schandl, and H. Weisz. 2011. Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(6): 855–876.
34. Fishman, T., H. Schandl, H. Tanikawa, P. Walker, and F. Krausmann. 2014. Accounting for the material stock of nations. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(3): 407–420.
35. Frazzoli, C., O.E. Orisakwe, R. Dragone, and A. Mantovani. 2010. Diagnostic health risk assessment of electronic waste on the general population in developing countries’ scenarios. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30(6): 388–399.
36. Gaustad, G., E. Olivetti, and R. Kirchain. 2010. Design for recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(2): 286–308.
37. Geisendorf, S. and F. Pietrulla. 2017. The circular economy and circular economic concepts: A literature analysis and redefinition. Thunderbird International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924. Accessed August 8, 2017.
38. Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N.M.P. Bocken, and E.J. Hultink. 2017. The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–768.
39. Geng, Y., J. Sarkis, S. Ulgiati, and P. Zhang. 2013. Measuring China's circular economy. Science 339(6127): 1526–1527.
40. Geyer, R., B. Kuczenski, T. Zink, and A. Henderson. 2016. Common misconceptions about recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology 20(5): 1010–1017.
41. Ghisellini, P., C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati. 2016. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 114. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development: 11–32.
42. Graedel, T.E., E.M. Harper, N.T. Nassar, and B.K. Reck. 2013. On the materials basis of modern society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201312752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312752110.
43. Haas, W., F. Krausmann, D. Wiedenhofer, and M. Heinz. 2015. How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19: 765–777.
44. Haberl, H. 2001. The energetic metabolism of societies part I: Accounting concepts. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(1): 11–33.
45. Haberl, H. and S. Geissler. 2000. Cascade utilization of biomass: Strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource. Ecological Engineering 16: 111–121.
46. Hashimoto, S., Y. Moriguchi, A. Saito, and T. Ono. 2004. Six indicators of material cycles for describing society's metabolism: Application to wood resources in Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 40(3): 201–223.
47. Hashimoto, S., H. Tanikawa, and Y. Moriguchi. 2009. Framework for estimating potential wastes and secondary resources accumulated within an economy—A case study of construction minerals in Japan. Waste Management 29(11): 2859–2866.
48. Haupt, M., C. Vadenbo, and S. Hellweg. 2017. Do we have the right performance indicators for the circular economy? Insight into the Swiss waste management system. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 21(3): 615–627.
49. Huysman, S., J. De Schaepmeester, K. Ragaert, J. Dewulf, and S. De Meester. 2017. Performance indicators for a circular economy: A case study on post-industrial plastic waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 120: 46–54.
50. IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Edited by T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1535 pp, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.
51. Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232.
52. Kovanda, J. 2014. Incorporation of recycling flows into economy-wide material flow accounting and analysis: A case study for the Czech Republic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 92(Supplement C): 78–84.
53. Krausmann, F., A. Schaffartzik, A. Mayer, N. Eisenmenger, S. Gingrich, H. Haberl, and M. Fischer-Kowalski. 2016. Long-term trends in global material and energy use. In Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations across Time and Space, edited by H. Haberl et al., Human-environment interactions, Vol. 5: 199–211. Switzerland: Springer.
54. Krausmann, F., H. Schandl, N. Eisenmenger, S. Giljum, and T. Jackson. 2017a. Material flow accounting: Measuring global material use for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42(1): 647–675.
55. Krausmann, F., D. Wiedenhofer, C. Lauk, W. Haas, H. Tanikawa, T. Fishman, A. Miatto, H. Schandl, and H. Haberl. 2017b. Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201613773. http://www.pnas.org/content/114/8/1880.
56. Laner, D., H. Rechberger, and T. Astrup. 2014. Systematic evaluation of uncertainty in material flow analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(6): 859–870.
57. Lauk, C., H. Haberl, K.-H. Erb, S. Gingrich, and F. Krausmann. 2012. Global socioeconomic carbon stocks in long-lived products 1900–2008. Environmental Research Letters 7(3): 034023.
58. Lieder, M. and A. Rashid. 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 115: 36–51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652615018661?via%3Dihub
59. MacArthur, E. 2013. Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Cowes, UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
60. McDonough, W. and M. Braungart. 2003. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. 1st ed. New York: Macmillan USA, June 2.
61. Miatto, A., H. Schandl, and H. Tanikawa. 2017. How important are realistic building lifespan assumptions for material stock and demolition waste accounts? Resources, Conservation and Recycling 122: 143–154.
62. Murray, A., K. Skene, and K. Haynes. 2017. The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics 140(3): 369–380.
63. Nicolli, F., M. Mazzanti, and V. Iafolla. 2012. Waste dynamics, country heterogeneity and European environmental policy effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14(4): 371–393.
64. Nuss, P., G.A. Blengini, W. Haas, A. Mayer, V. Nita, and D. Pennington. 2017. Development of a Sankey diagram of material flows in the EU economy based on Eurostat data, EUR 28811 EN. JRC technical reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, November 7. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/40dffbce-c439-11e7-9b01-01aa75ed71a1. Accessed November 8, 2017.
65. Nuss, P. and G.A. Blengini. 2018. Towards better monitoring of technology critical elements in Europe: Coupling of natural and anthropogenic cycles. Science of the Total Environment 613–614: 569–578.
66. O'Neill, D. 2015. What should be held steady in a steady-state economy? Interpreting Daly's definition at the national level. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19(4): 552–563.
67. Patrício, J., Y. Kalmykova, L. Rosado, and V. Lisovskaja. 2015. Uncertainty in material flow analysis indicators at different spatial levels. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19(5): 837–852.
68. Pauliuk, S. 2018. Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001: 2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 129: 81–92.
69. Pauliuk, S., T. Wang, and D.B. Müller. 2012. Moving toward the circular economy: The role of stocks in the Chinese steel cycle. Environmental Science & Technology 46(1): 148–154.
70. Reck, B.K. and T.E. Graedel. 2012. Challenges in metal recycling. Science 337(6095): 690–695.
71. Reck, B.K., D.B. Müller, K. Rostkowski, and T.E. Graedel. 2008. Anthropogenic nickel cycle: Insights into use, trade, and recycling. Environmental Science & Technology 42(9): 3394–3400.
72. Saltelli, A., K. Chan, and E.M. Scott. 2000. Sensitivity analysis. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
73. Schandl, H., M. Fischer-Kowalski, J. West, S. Giljum, M. Dittrich, N. Eisenmenger, A. Geschke., et al. 2017. Global material flows and resource productivity: Forty years of evidence: Global material flows and resource productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12626. Accessed December 14, 2017.
74. Schiller, G., K. Gruhler, and R. Ortlepp. 2017. Quantification of anthropogenic metabolism using spatially differentiated continuous MFA. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 3(1): 119–132.
75. Smith, P., H. Clark, H. Dong, E.A. Elsiddig, H. Haberl, R. Harper, J. House., et al. 2014. Chapter 11: Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, November. www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2017.
76. Stahel, W.R. 2016. The circular economy. Nature News 531(7595): 435.
77. Therond, O., M. Duru, J. Roger-Estrade, and G. Richard. 2017. A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37(3): 1–24.
78. Tisserant, A., S. Pauliuk, S. Merciai, J. Schmidt, J. Fry, R. Wood, and A. Tukker. 2017. Solid waste and the circular economy: A global analysis of waste treatment and waste footprints: Global analysis of solid waste and waste footprint. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3): 628–640.
79. UNEP. 2012. GEO 5: global environment outlook: Environment for the future we want. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
80. Voet, E. van der, S. de Bruyn, and A. Tukker. 2009. Environmental impact of the use of natural resources and products. CML Report 184. Leiden Universitiy. www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/eurostat_indicators_final_report_version_141009.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2018.
81. Wang, T., D.B. Müller, and T.E. Graedel. 2007. Forging the anthropogenic iron cycle. Environmental Science & Technology 41(14): 5120–5129.
82. Wiedenhofer, D., J.K. Steinberger, N. Eisenmenger, and W. Haas. 2015. Maintenance and expansion: Modeling material stocks and flows for residential buildings and transportation networks in the EU25: Stocks and flows in the EU25. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19(4): 538–551.
83. Wiedmann, T.O., H. Schandl, M. Lenzen, D. Moran, S. Suh, J. West, and K. Kanemoto. 2015. The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(20): 6271–6276.
84. Wijkman, A. and K. Skanberg. 2015. The circular economy and benefits for society: Swedish case study shows jobs and climate as clear winners. An Interim Report by the Club of Rome with Support from the MAVA Foundation and the Swedish Association of Recycling Industries. https://groenomstilling.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sites/default/files/media/final-version-swedish-study-13-04-15-till-tryck-ny.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2018.
85. Winans, K., A. Kendall, and H. Deng. 2017. The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 825–833.
86. Yuan, Z., J. Bi, and Y. Moriguichi. 2006. The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(1–2): 4–8.
87. Zanten, H.H.E.V., M. Herrero, O.V. Hal, E. Röös, A. Muller, T. Garnett, P.J. Gerber, C. Schader, and I.J.M.D. Boer. 2018. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. Global Change Biology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.14321. Accessed June 25, 2018.
88. Zink, T. and R. Geyer. 2017. Circular economy rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12545. Accessed March 3, 2017.