Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources

Resources

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 25-54

  Bringezu, Stefan ^a,b  

^a Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Indicators; Material footprint; Resource consumption; Resource efficiency; Resource policy; Safe operating space

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982851553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20799276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/resources4010025     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. DESTATIS Federal Statistical Office. Sustainable Development in Germany. In Indicator Report 2014; DESTATIS Federal Statistical Office: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/EN/Publications/Specialized/EnvironmentalEconomicAccounting/Indicat ors2014.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed on 6 February 2015).
2. BMU-German Ministry for Environment, Nature and Nuclear Safety. Deutsches Ressourceneffizienzprogramm (ProgRess). In Programm zur nachhaltigen Nutzung und zum Schutz der Natürlichen Ressourcen (German Resource Efficiency Programme (ProgRess). Programme for Sustainable Use and Protection of Natural Resources). Beschluss des Bundeskabinetts vom 29.2.2012; Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit: Berlin, Germany, 2012.
3. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Fundamental Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society (Tentative Translation by Ministry of the Environment). Available online: http://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/smcs/2nd-f_plan.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2013).
4. European Commission. Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, (COM (2005) 670 final); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
5. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, (COM (2011) 571 final); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
6. European Commission. Commission Staff Working Paper: Analysis Associated with the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe-Part II; Accompanying the Document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, (COM(2011) 571 final)/(SEC(2011) 1068 final). European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
7. European Commission. General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living Well, within the Limits of Our Planet; Publications Office: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2014.
8. Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Steger, S. Politische und rechtliche Ansätze für inputorientierte Ressourcenziele in Europa und weltweit. Available online: http://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/servlets/ MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDOCS_derivate_000000003554/Polress_AP1-AS1.1_xbersichtxRessource nzielexEuropaxundxweltweit_FINAL.pdf?hosts= (accessed on 6 February 2015).
9. Eurostat. Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators-A Methodological Guide; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2001.
10. Eurostat. Economy Wide Material Flow Accounts: Compilation Guidelines for Reporting to the 2009 Eurostat Questionnaire, Version 01; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2009.
11. Eurostat. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA). Compilation Guide 2012; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2012.
12. OECD. Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2008.
13. Friends of the Earth-Four Footprints Briefing. Available online: https://www.foe.co.uk/ sites/default/files/downloads/four-footprints-45569.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015)
14. Wiedmann, T.O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., Kanemoto, K. The material footprint of nations. PNAS 2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1220362110.
15. Lettenmeier, M., Liedtke, C., Rohn, H. Eight Tons of Material Footprint-Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland. Resources 2014, 3, 488-515.
16. Hertwich, E.G., Peters, G.P. Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-linked Analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6414-6420.
17. McGlade, J., Werner, B., Young, M., Matlock, M., Jefferies, D., Sonnemann, G., Aldaya, M., Pfister, S., Berger, M., Farell, C., et al. Measuring Water Use in a Green Economy; A Report of the Working Group on Water Efficiency to the International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/50244/publications/Measuring_Water.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
18. Bringezu, S., O'Brien, M., Schütz, H. Beyond biofuels: Assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass-A conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 224-232.
19. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., et al. Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth; A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/ Portals/50244/publications/Decoupling_Report_English.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
20. Dittrich, M., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Polzin, C. Green Economies around the World? Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment; SERI: Vienna, Austria, 2012.
21. Von Weizsäcker, E.U., Aloisi de Larderel, J., Hargroves, K., Smith, M.H., Enriquez Rodrigues, M.A., Hudson, C., Siriban Manalang, A.B., Urama, K., Suh, S., Swilling, M., et al. Decoupling 2. Technologies, Opportunities and Policy Options; A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/ AreasofResearchPublications/AssessmentAreasReports/Decoupling/tabid/133329/Default.aspx (accessed on 6 February 2015).
22. IRP-International Resource Panel. Managing and conserving the natural resource base for sustained economic and social development. In A Reflection from the International Resource Panel on the Establishment of Sustainable Development Goals aimed at Decoupling Economic Growth from Escalating Resource Use and Environmental Degradation; Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/50244/publications/IRP%20Think%20Piece%20Contr ibuting%20to%20the%20SDGs%20Process.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015)
23. Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., Pengue, W., O'Brien, M., Garcia, F., Sims, R., Howarth, R.T., Kauppi, L., Swilling, M., Herrick, J. Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply; Report of the International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/24102/PDFs//Full_Report-Assessing_Global_Land_ UseEnglish_(PDF).pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
24. Rockström, J; Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., III; Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472-475.
25. Hertwich, E., van der Voet, E., Suh, S., Tukker, A., Huijbregts, M., Kazmierczyk, P., Lenzen, M., McNeely, J., Moriguchi, Y. Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials; A Report of the Working Group on the Environmental Impacts of Products and Materials to the International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Areasof ResearchPublications/AssessmentAreasReports/EnvironmentalImpacts/tabid/133331/Default.aspx (accessed on 6 February 2015)
26. Wuppertal Institute. Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland (Sustainable Germany); Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Swiss; Boston, MA, USA; Berlin, Germany, 1996.
27. Bringezu, S. Visions of a sustainable resource use. In Sustainable Resource Management: Global Trends, Visions and Policies; Bringezu, S., Bleischwitz, R., Eds., Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK, 2009; pp. 155-215.
28. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C., et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.
29. Haberl, H., Erb, K.H., Krausmann, F., Gaube, V., Bondeau, A., Plutzar, C., Gingrich, S., Lucht, W., Fischer-Kowalski, M. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. PNAS 2007, 104, 12942-12947.
30. MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
31. UNEP. Geo 5. Global environmental outlook. In Environment for the Future We Want; 2012. Available online: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo5.asp (accessed on 6 February 2015)
32. Townsend, A., Howarth, R.W. Human acceleration of the global nitrogen cycle. Sci. Am. 2010, 302, 32-39.
33. Howarth, R., Swaney, D., Billen, G., Garnier, J., Hong, B., Humborg, C., Johnes, P., Mörth, C., Marino, R. Nitrogen fluxes from the landscape are controlled by net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs and by climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2012, 10, 37-43.
34. Sutton, M.A., Bleeker, A., Howard, C.M., Bekunda, M., Grizzetti, B., de Vries, W., van Grinsven, H.J.M., Abrol, Y.P., Adhya, T.K., Billen, G., et al. Our Nutrient World: The Challenge to Produce More Food and Energy with Less Pollution. Global Overview of Nutrient Management; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology on behalf of the Global Partnership on Nutrient Management and the International Nitrogen Initiative: Edinburgh, UK, 2013.
35. Leach, A.M., Galloway, J.N., Bleeker, A., Erisman, J.W., Kohn, R., Kitzes, J. A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ. Dev. 2012, 1, 40-66.
36. Schmidt-Bleek, F., Bringezu, S., Hinterberger, F., Liedtke, Ch., Spangenberg, J., Stiller, H., Welfens, M.J. MAIA. Einführung in die Material-Intensitätsanalyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Swiss; Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 1998.
37. Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., Schütz, H. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies; WRI: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
38. European Environment Agency (EEA). Environmental Signals 2000; EEA: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
39. EEA. Environmental pressures from European consumption and production. EEA Tech. Rep. 2013, 2, doi:10.2800/70634.
40. Zah, R., Binder, C., Bringezu, S., Reinhard, J., Schmid, A., Schütz, H. Future Perspectives of 2nd Generation Biofuels; Vdf Hochschulverlag: Zürich, Switzerland, 2010.
41. Keledjian, A., Brogan, G., Lowell, B., Warrenchuk, J., Enticknap, B., Shester, G., Hirshfield, M., Cano-Stocco, D. Wasted catch: Unsolved problems in the U.S. Fisheries. Oceana. Available online: http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/Bycatch_Report_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2014).
42. Hilborn, R. Are Sustainable Fisheries Achievable? In Marine Conservation Biology; Norse, E.A., Crowder, L.B., Eds., Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 247-259.
43. Barbier, E.B. Economics, Natural Resource Scarcity and Development. In Conventional and Alternative Views; Earthscan Publications: London, UK, 1989.
44. Daly, H.E. Towards some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 1990, 2, 1-6.
45. Bringezu, S. Ressourcennnutzung in Wirtschaftsräumen (Resource Use of Economies); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000.
46. NRC-National Research Council. Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
47. European Commission. Report on critical raw materials for the EU: Report of the Ad hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials European Commission, 2014. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/raw-materials/critical/index_en.htm (accessed on 7 October 2014).
48. Rørbech, J.T., Vadenbo, C., Hellweg, S., Astrup, T.F. Impact Assessment of Abiotic Resources in LCA: Quantitative Comparison of Selected Characterization Models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 11072-11081.
49. European Commission. ILCD Handbook: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European Context; European Commission: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2011.
50. Swart, P., Dewulf, J. Quantifying the impacts of primary metal resource use in life cycle assessment based on recent mining data. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 73, 180-187.
51. Van der Voet, E., Salminen, R., Eckelman, M., Mudd, G., Norgate, T., Hischier, R. Environmental Risks and Challenges of Anthropogenic Metals Flows and Cycles; A Report of the Working Group on the Global Metal Flows to the International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/50244/publications/Environmental_Challenges_Metals -Full%20Report_150dpi_130923.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015)
52. Bösch, M.E., Hellweg, S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Frischknecht, R. Cumulative Exergy Demand LCA Methodology Applying Cumulative Exergy Demand (CExD) Indicators to the Ecoinvent Database. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12, 181-190.
53. Ayres, R.U. Exergy flows in the economy: Efficiency and dematerialization. In A Handbook of Industrial Ecology; Ayres, R.U., Ayres, L.W., Eds., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.: Cheltenham, UK, 2002; pp. 185-201.
54. Graedel, T.E., Barr, R., Chandler, C., Chase, T., Choi, J., Christofferson, L., Friedlander, E., Henly, C., Jun, C., Nassar, N.T., et al. Methodology of metal criticality determination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1063-1070.
55. Barnosky, A.D., Hadly, E.A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E.L., Brown, J.H., Fortelius, M., Getz, W.M., Harte, J., Hastings, A., Marquet, P.A., et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere. Nature 2012, 486, 52-58.
56. Schmidt-Bleek, F. Will Gemany remain a good place for Industry? The Ecological Side of the Coin'. Fres. Env. Bull. 1992, 1, 417-422.
57. Schmidt-Bleek, F. Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? Faktor 10-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften; Birkhäuser Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1994.
58. The International Factor 10 Club's 2010 Declaration: A coalition of willing states needed to catalyze a ten-fold leap in energy and resource efficiency. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Factor 10 Club, Carnoules, France, 9-12 September 2010.
59. Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., Moll, S. Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy-Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators. J. Indust. Ecol. 2003, 7, 43-67.
60. Ekins, P., Meyer, B., Schmidt-Bleek, F. Reducing Resource Consumption-A Proposal for Global Resource and Environmental Policy. Available online: http://www.worldresourcesforum.org/ files/file/gws-paper09-5-versionDavos.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
61. Crutzen, P.J., Stoermer, E.F. The Anthropocene. Glob. Chang. News 2000, 41, 17-18.
62. Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., McNeill, J. The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2011, 369, 842-867.
63. Syvitski, J.P.M., Kettner, A. Sediment flux and the Anthropocene. Philos. Trans. R. S. A 2011, 369, 957-975.
64. Oppenheimer, C. Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815. Progress Phys. Geogr. 2003, 27, 230-259.
65. This comprises both intrusive and extrusive magma formation by subduction volcanos and continental intrashield volcanos; these flows contribute to more or less abrupt changes of landscapes in contrast to the slower tectonic movements; most of those magma flows do not reach the surface. The extrusive magma formation (with eruptions) in the terrestrial zones is only 2 Gt/a.
66. Schmincke, H.-U. Vulkanismus; Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: Darmstadt, Germany, 1986.
67. Schmincke, H.-U. Transfer von festen, flüssigen und gasförmigen Stoffen aus Vulkanen in die Atmosphäre. Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung 1993, 5, 27-44.
68. The online portal for material flow data. Available online: http://www.materialflows.net (accessed on 27 September 2014).
69. Bührs, T. Environmental Space as a Basis for Legitimating Global Governance of Environmental Limits. Glob. Environ. Politics 2009, 9, 111-135.
70. WCED-World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
71. Freestone, D., Hey, E. The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation; Kluwer Law International: Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, 1996.
72. Raworth, K. A safe and just space for humanity. Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Discuss. Pap. 2012, 8, 1-26.
73. Contraction and Convergence. Available online: http://www.gci.org.uk/index.html (accessed on 6 February 2015).
74. Eurostat. Material Flow Accounts. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/ index.php/Material_flow_accounts (accessed on 6 February 2015).
75. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Resource Productivity in the G8 and the OECD, 2008. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/env/waste/47944428.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
76. Eurostat. Estimates for Raw Material Consumption (RMC) and Raw Material Equivalents (RME) conversion factors, 2014. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1798247/ 6191533/RME-project-Introduction.pdf/96bbe739-bfda-47a2-99c7-cc3ec1048832 (accessed on 6 February 2015).
77. European Resource Efficiency Platform (EREP). Manifesto and policy recommendations, 2014. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource:efficiency/documents/erep_manifesto_ and_policy_recommendations_31-03-2014.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
78. Bringezu, S. Towards Increasing Resource Productivity: How to Measure the Total Material Consumption of Regional or National Economies? Fresenius Environ. Bull. 1993, 8, 437-442.
79. Wuppertal Institute. Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland (Sustainable Germany); Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag: Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 2008.
80. Bringezu, S. Key elements for Economy-wide Sustainable Resource Management. Annal. Mines Serie Responsab. Environ. 2011, 61, 78-87.
81. BIO Intelligence Service; Institute for Social Ecology; Sustainable Europe Research Institute. Assessment of Resource Efficiency Indicators and Targets; Final Report Prepared for the European Commission, DG Environment, 2012. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/enveco/resource:efficiency/pdf/report.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015)
82. Schütz, H. Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal, Germany. Unpublished work, 2013.
83. Rogich, D., Cassara, A., Wernick, I., Miranda, M. Material Flows in the United States. A Physical Accounting of the U.S. Industrial Economy; An WRI Report; Word Resources Institute: Washington, WA, USA, 2008.
84. Wang, H., Yue, Q., Lu, Z., Schütz, H., Bringezu, S. Total material requirement of growing China: 1995-2008. Resources 2013, 2, 270-285.
85. Dredging amounts to about an additional 10% of the excavation, and would not significantly change that order of magnitude. For dredging, only data for Denmark, Germany, Netherlands and USA are available. For 2000, dredging in European countries was estimated with 0.59 t/person (Schütz based on country studies), and in the USA with 0.88 t/person when considering only deposition on land [46].
86. Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R., Meybeck, A. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Extent, Causes and Prevention; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.
87. O'Brien (in prep) based on the analysis of net annual increment of world forests determined 0.2 to 0.3 t/person as safe operating space.
88. Bringezu, S., Schütz, H. Ziele und Indikatoren für die Umsetzung von ProgRess (Targets and indicators for implementing ProgRess). PolRess Arbeitspapier AS1.2/1.3, March 2013. Available online: http://www.ressourcenpolitik.de/ergebnisse/ (accessed on 6 February 2015).
89. Meyer, B., Barker, A., Barton, J., Long, K., Pollitt, H., Distelkamp, M., Meyer, M., Walter, H., Giljum, S., Kalcik, R., et al. Macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment. Final Report of the MacMod project (ENV.F.1/ETU/2010/0033) to the European Commission, 2011. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/studies_modelling/pdf/report_macroeconomic.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2015).
90. Bringezu, S., Bleischwitz, R., Eds. Sustainable Resource Management: Global Trends, Visions and Policies; Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK, 2009.
91. Bringezu, S., Schütz, H. Indikatoren und Ziele zur Steigerung der Ressourcenprodktivität (Indicators and targets for increasing resource productivity). PolRess Arbeitspapier AS 1.4, March Available online: http://www.ressourcenpolitik.de/ergebnisse/ (accessed on 6 February 2015).