Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 42, Issue , 2017, Pages 647-675

  Krausmann, Fridolin ^a   Schandl, Heinz ^b,c   Eisenmenger, Nina ^a   Giljum, Stefan ^d   Jackson, Tim ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decoupling; Material consumption; Material footprint; Material productivity; Metabolic transition; Socio economic metabolism

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; EXTRACTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; METABOLISM; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY;

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS; DECOUPLING; MATERIAL CONSUMPTION; MATERIAL FLOW ACCOUNTINGS; METABOLIC TRANSITION; PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE USE;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85028057604     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726     Document Type: Review

References (175)

1. Graedel TE, Harper EM, Nassar NT, Reck BK. 2015. On the materials basis of modern society. PNAS 112(20):6295-300
2. Shiklomanov IA. 2000. Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int. 25(1):11-32
3. Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N, Erb KH, Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M. 2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecol. Econ. 68(10):2696-705
4. Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ. 2016. Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Pap., Carbon Dioxide Inf. Anal. Cent., Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. US Dep. Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. http://cdiac. ornl. gov/trends/emis/tre-glob. html
5. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P, Kennedy C. 2013. Environment: waste production must peak this century. Nature 502(7473):615-17
6. SteffenW, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR. 2007. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature AMBIO J. Hum. Environ. 36(8):614-21
7. Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F. 2014. Human appropriation of net primary production: patterns, trends, and planetary boundaries. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39(1):363-91
8. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, et al. 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320(5878):889-92
9. Izard CF, MüllerDB. 2010. Tracking the devil'smetal: historical global and contemporaryUS tin cycles. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54(12):1436-41
10. Kapur A, Graedel TE. 2006. Copper mines above and below the ground. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(10):3135-41
11. Rockström J, SteffenW, Noone K, ÅPersson, Chapin FSI, et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 14(2):32-63
12. SteffenW, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855
13. Pauliuk S, Hertwich EG. 2015. Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecol. Econ. 119:83-93
14. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H. 2015. Social metabolism: Ametric for biophysical growth and degrowth. In Handbook of Ecological Economics, ed. J Martinez-Alier, R Muradian, pp. 100-38. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
15. Bringezu S, Moriguchi Y. 2002. Material flow analysis. In A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, ed. RU Ayres, LW Ayres, pp. 79-91. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
16. Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Giljum S, Lutter S, Mayer A, et al. 2011. Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting. J. Ind. Ecol. 15(6):855-76
17. European Environment Agency (EEA). 2010. The European Environment-State and Outlook 2010: Synthesis. Copenhagen, Den. : EEA
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. Material Resources, Productivity and the Environment. Paris: OECD
19. European Statistical Office (Eurostat). 2001. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide. Luxemb., Luxembourg: Eurostat
20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity, Vol. I: The OECD Guide. Paris: OECD21
21. Fischer-Kowalski M. 1998. Society's metabolism. The intellectual history of material flow analysis, Part I, 1860-1970. J. Ind. Ecol. 2(1):61-78
22. Martinez-Alier J. 2004. Marx, energy and social metabolism. Encycl. Energy 3:825-34
23. Fischer-Kowalski M, Hüttler W. 1998. Society's metabolism. J. Ind. Ecol. 2(4):107-36
24. Ayres RU, Kneese AV. 1969. Production, consumption, and externalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 59:282-97
25. Graedel TE, Lifset RJ. 2016. Industrial ecology's first decade. See Ref. 171, pp. 3-20
26. Fischer-Kowalski M, WeiszH. 1999. Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Adv. Hum. Ecol. 8:215-51
27. Baccini P, Brunner PH. 2012. Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation, Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2nd ed.
28. Daxbeck H, Baccini P, Brunner PH. 1994. Industrial metabolism at the regional and local level: A case study on a Swiss region. See Ref. 142, pp. 163-93
29. Kennedy C, Cuddihy J, Engel-Yan J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. J. Ind. Ecol. 11(2):43-59
30. Rosado L, Niza S, Ferrao P. 2014. A material flow accounting case study of the Lisbon metropolitan area using the urban metabolism analyst model. J. Ind. Ecol. 18(1):84-101
31. Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Pallua I. 2014. A sociometabolic reading of the Anthropocene: modes of subsistence, population size and human impact on Earth. Anthr. Rev. 1(1):8-33
32. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H, eds. 2007. Socioecological Transitions and Global Change: Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
33. Krausmann F, Weisz H, Eisenmenger N. 2016. Transitions in sociometabolic regimes throughout human history. See Ref. 172, pp. 63-92
34. Krausmann F, Fischer-Kowalski M, Schandl H, Eisenmenger N. 2008. The global sociometabolic transition. J. Ind. Ecol. 12(5-6):637-56
35. Gonzales deMolina, Toledo V. 2014. The SocialMetabolism-A Socio-Ecological Theory of Historical Change, Vol. 3. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 355 pp.
36. Pauliuk S, Hertwich EG. 2016. Prospective models of society's future metabolism: what industrial ecology has to contribute. See Ref. 171, pp. 21-43
37. Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T, Geschke A, Cai Y, et al. 2016. Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 132:45-56
38. Schandl H, Schaffartzik A. 2015. Material flow analysis. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. JD Wright, pp. 760-64. Oxford, UK: Elsevier
39. PaleyWS. 1952. Resources for Freedom: Report of the President's Materials Policy Commission. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off.
40. Bringezu S. 1993. Towards increasing resource productivity: how to measure the total material consumption of regional or national economies. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2(8):437-42
41. Ministry of the Environment. 1994. Quality of the Environment in Japan 1994. Tokyo, Jpn. : Min. Environ. Gov. Jpn. http://www. env. go. jp/en/wpaper/1994/index. html
42. Steurer A. 1992. Stoffstrombilanz österreich 1988, Vol. 26. Vienna: IFF Soc. Ecology
43. Adriaanse A, Bringezu S, Hammond A, Moriguchi Y, Rodenburg E, et al. 1997. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies. Washington, DC:World Res. Inst.
44. Matthews E, Amann C, Bringezu S, Fischer-Kowalski M, Hüttler W, et al. 2000. TheWeight of Nations: Material Outflows from Industrial Economies. Washington, DC:World Res. Inst.
45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Vol. II: The Accounting Framework. Paris: OECD
46. United Nations. 2014. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Central Framework. New York: United Nations
47. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2016. Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Assessment Report for the UNEP International Resource Panel. Paris: UNEP
48. European Statistical Office (Eurostat). 2013. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA). Compilation Guide 2013. Luxemb., Luxembourg: Eurostat
49. Krausmann F, WeiszH, Eisenmenger N, SchützH, Haas W, Schaffartzik A. 2015. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounting Introduction and Guide, Vol. 151. Vienna: IFF Soc. Ecology
50. Bringezu S, van de Sand I, Schütz H, Bleischwitz R, Moll S. 2009. Analysing global resource use of national and regional economies across various levels. See Ref. 174, pp. 10-52
51. Pauliuk S, Majeau-Bettez G, Müller DB. 2015. A general system structure and accounting framework for socioeconomic metabolism. J. Ind. Ecol. 19(5):728-41
52. Haberl H. 2001. The energetic metabolism of societies Part I: Accounting concepts. J. Ind. Ecol. 5(1):11-33
53. S casnỳ M, Kovanda J, Hák T. 2003. Material flow accounts, balances and derived indicators for the Czech Republic during the 1990s: results and recommendations formethodological improvements. Ecol. Econ. 45(1):41-57
54. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Moll S. 2003. Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide materials flow analysis and derived indicators. J. Ind. Ecol. 7(2):43-64
55. Eisenmenger N, Fischer-Kowalski M, Weisz H. 2007. Indicators of natural resource use and consumption. See Ref. 175, pp. 193-222
56. Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y. 2004. Proposal of six indicators of material cycles for describing society's metabolism: from the viewpoint of material flow analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 40(3):185-200
57. Kovanda J, van de Sand I, Schütz H, Bringezu S. 2012. Economy-wide material flow indicators: overall framework, purposes and uses and comparison of material use and resource intensity of the Czech Republic, Germany and the EU-15. Ecol. Indic. 17:88-98
58. European Commission. 2011. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (COM2011 571). Brussels: Eur. Comm.
59. Ministry of the Environment. 2013. Fundamental Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society. Tokyo, Jpn. : Ministry Environ. Gov. Jpn.
60. Van der Voet E, Van Oers L, De Bruyn S, De Jong F, Tukker A. 2009. Environmental Impact of the Use of Natural Resources and Products, Vol. 184. Leiden, Neth. : Leiden Univ., Inst. Environ. Sci. (CML)
61. van der Voet E, van Oers L, Nikolic I. 2004. Dematerialization: not just a matter of weight. J. Ind. Ecol. 8(4):121-37
62. JRC. 2012. Life cycle indicators for resources, products and waste. Rep. EUR 25466, Joint Res. Cent., Inst. Environ. Sustain., EU Comm., Ispra, Italy. http://publications. jrc. ec. europa. eu/repository/bitstream/ 111111111/31346/1/lbna25466enn. pdf
63. Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C, Wiebe KS. 2012. Materials embodied in international trade-global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005. Glob. Environ. Change 22(3):568-76
64. Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S. 2012. Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol. Indic. 16:100-12
65. Kovanda J, Weinzettel J. 2013. The importance of raw material equivalents in economy-wide material flow accounting and its policy dimension. Environ. Sci. Policy. 29:71-80
66. Giljum S, Bruckner M, Martinez A. 2015. Material footprint assessment in a global input-output framework. J. Ind. Ecol. 19(5):792-804
67. Wiedmann TO, Schandl H, Lenzen M, Moran D, Suh S, et al. 2015. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(20):6271-76
68. Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T. 2007. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice. Ecol. Econ. 61(1):27-42
69. Rodrigues J, Domingos T. 2008. Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: comparing two approaches. Ecol. Econ. 66(2-3):533-46
70. Eisenmenger N, Wiedenhofer D, Schaffartzik A, Giljum S, Bruckner M, et al. 2016. Consumptionbasedmaterial flow indicators-comparing six ways of calculating the Austrian rawmaterial consumption providing six results. Ecol. Econ. 128:177-86
71. Saurat M, Ritthoff M. 2013. Calculating MIPS 2. 0. Resources 2(4):581-607
72. Lutter S, Giljum S, Bruckner M. 2016. A review and comparative assessment of existing approaches to calculate material footprints. Ecol. Econ. 127:1-10
73. Schoer K, Weinzettel J, Kovanda J, Giegrich J, Lauwigi C. 2012. Raw material consumption of the European Union: concept, calculation method and results. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(16):8903-9
74. Tukker A, Poliakov E, Heijungs R, Hawkins T, Neuwahl F, et al. 2009. Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database. Ecol. Econ. 68(7):1928-37
75. Schaffartzik A, Eisenmenger N, Krausmann F, Weisz H. 2014. Consumption-based material flow accounting. J. Ind. Ecol. 18(1):102-12
76. Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Geschke A. 2013. Building EORA: A global multi-region inputoutput database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25(1):20-49
77. Peters GP, Andrew R, Lennox J. 2011. Constructing an environmentally-extendedmulti-regional inputoutput table using the GTAP database. Econ. Syst. Res. 23(2):131-52
78. Tukker A, Dietzenbacher E. 2013. Global multiregional input-output frameworks: An introduction and outlook. Econ. Syst. Res. 25(1):1-19
79. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H. 1997. Tons, joules, and money: modes of production and their sustainability problems. Soc. Nat. Resour. 10(1):61-85
80. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H. 2007. Conceptualizing, observing and comparing socioecological transitions. See Ref. 32, pp. 1-30
81. Schandl H, Schulz N. 2002. Changes in the United Kingdom's natural relations in terms of society's metabolism and land-use from 1850 to the present day. Ecol. Econ. 41(2):203-21
82. Gierlinger S, Krausmann F. 2012. The physical economy of the United States of America. J. Ind. Ecol. 16(3):365-77
83. Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Nourbakhch-Sabet R. 2011. The metabolic transition in Japan: A material flow account for the period 1878 to 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 15(6):877-92
84. Infante-Amate J, Soto D, Aguilera E, Garca-Ruiz R, Guzmán G, et al. 2015. The Spanish transition to industrial metabolism: long-term material flow analysis (1860-2010). J. Ind. Ecol. 19:866-76
85. Krausmann F, Gaugl B, West J, Schandl H. 2016. The metabolic transition of a planned economy: material flows in the USSR and the Russian Federation 1900 to 2010. Ecol. Econ. 124:76-85
86. Kovanda J, Hak T. 2011. Historical perspectives of material use in Czechoslovakia in 1855-2007. Ecol. Indic. 11(5):1375-84
87. Fishman T, Schandl H, Tanikawa H, Walker P, Krausmann F. 2014. Accounting for the material stock of nations. J. Ind. Ecol. 18(3):407-20
88. Wiedenhofer D, Rovenskaya E, Haas W, Krausmann F, Pallua I, Fischer-Kowalski M. 2013. Is there a 1970s syndrome Analyzing structural breaks in the metabolism of industrial economies. Energy Procedia 40:182-91
89. Giljum S, Dittrich M, Lieber M, Lutter S. 2014. Global patterns of material flows and their socioeconomic and environmental implications: An MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009. Resources 3(1):319-39
90. Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Gingrich S, EisenmengerN, Loy C, Krausmann F. 2014. The global metabolic transition: regional patterns and trends of globalmaterial flows, 1950-2010. Glob. Environ. Change 26:87-97
91. Krausmann F, WiedenhoferD, LaukC, HaasW, Tanikawa H, et al. 2017. Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. PNAS 14:1880-85
92. Steinberger JK, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N. 2010. Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis. Ecol. Econ. 69(5):1148-58
93. Weisz H, Krausmann F, Amann C, Eisenmenger N, Erb KH, et al. 2006. The physical economy of the European Union: cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption. Ecol. Econ. 58(4):676-98
94. Krausmann F, ErbK-H, Gingrich S, Lauk C, Haberl H. 2008. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol. Econ. 65(3):471-87
95. Mayer A, Schaffartzik A, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N. 2016. More than the sum of its parts: patterns in global material flows. See. Ref. 172, pp. 217-37
96. Steger S, Bleischwitz R. 2011. Drivers for the use of materials across countries. J. Clean. Prod. 19(8):816-26
97. Pauliuk S, Müller DB. 2014. The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Change 24:132-42
98. Wang H, Tian X, Tanikawa H, Chang M, Hashimoto S, et al. 2014. Exploring China's materialization process with economic transition: Analysis of raw material consumption and its socioeconomic drivers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(9):5025-32
99. Schandl H, West J. 2012. Material flows and material productivity in China, Australia, and Japan. J. Ind. Ecol. 16(3):352-64
100. Schandl H, West J. 2010. Resource use and resource efficiency in the Asia-Pacific region. Glob. Environ. Change 20(4):636-47
101. West J, Schandl H, Krausmann F, Kovanda J, Hak T. 2014. Patterns of change in material use and material efficiency in the successor states of the Former Soviet Union. Ecol. Econ. 105:211-19
102. Dittrich M, Bringezu S, Schütz H. 2012. The physical dimension of international trade, part 2: indirect global resource flows between 1962 and 2005. Ecol. Econ. 79:32-43
103. Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Eisenmenger N, Krausmann F. 2016. Global patterns of metal extractivism, 1950-2010: providing the bones for the industrial society's skeleton. Ecol. Econ. 122:101-10
104. Giljum S, Eisenmenger N. 2004. North-South trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: A biophysical perspective. J. Environ. Dev. 13(1):73-100
105. Moran DD, Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Geschke A. 2013. Does ecologically unequal exchange occur Ecol. Econ. 89:177-86
106. Perez-Rincon MA. 2006. Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: Towards an ecological "Prebisch thesis. " Ecol. Econ. 59(4):519-29
107. Giljum S. 2004. Trade, materials flows, and economic development in the South: The example of Chile. J. Ind. Ecol. 8(1-2):241-61
108. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Steger S, Baudisch J. 2004. International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR. Ecol. Econ. 51(1-2):97-124
109. Canas Â, Ferraõ P, Conceiçaõ P. 2003. A new environmentalKuznets curve Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialised countries. Ecol. Econ. 46(2):217-29
110. Seppälä T, Haukioja T, KAIvo-ojA J. 2001. The EKC hypothesis does not hold for direct material flows:Environmental KuznetsCurve Hypothesis tests for directmaterial flows in five industrial countries. Popul. Environ. 23(2):217-38
111. West J, Schandl H. 2013. Material use and material efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ecol. Econ. 94:19-27
112. Steinberger JK, Krausmann F, GetznerM, Schandl H, West J. 2013. Development and dematerialization: An international study. PLOS ONE 8(10):e70385
113. European Commission. 2011. A resource-efficient Europe-Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Communication (COM 2011 21). Brussels: European Commission. http://www. cbss. org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/10/resource-efficient-europe-en. pdf
114. Ekins P. 2002. Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth. New York: Routledge
115. United Nations Environmment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP
116. Giljum S, Hak T, Hinterberger F, Kovanda J. 2005. Environmental governance in the European Union: strategies and instruments for absolute decoupling. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 8(1-2):31-46
117. Ruffing K. 2007. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. See Ref. 175, pp. 211-22
118. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2014. Decoupling 2: Technologies, Opportunities and Policy Options. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP
119. Steger S, Bleischwitz R. 2009. Decoupling GDP from resource use, resource productivity and competitiveness. See Ref. 173, pp. 172-93
120. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2016. Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications. A Report of the International Resource Panel. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP
121. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Saurat M, Moll S, Acosta Fernandez J, Steger S. 2009. Europe's resource use: basic trends, global and sectoral patterns and environmental and socioeconomic impacts. See Ref. 174, pp. 52-155
122. vonWeizsäcker EU, Hargroves C, SmithMH, DeshaC, Stasinopoulos P. 2009. Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy Through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. London: Earthscan
123. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, Worrell E. 2011. Material efficiency: A white paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(3):362-81
124. Ekins P. 2009. The rationale for and economic implications of dematerialisation. See Ref. 173, pp. 305-37
125. Jackson T. 2016. Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. New York: Routledge
126. Nørgard J, Xue J. 2016. Between green growth and degrowth: decoupling, rebound effects and the politics for long-term sustainability. See Ref. 131, pp. 267-84
127. Ward JD, Sutton PC, Werner AD, Costanza R, Mohr SH, Simmons CT. 2016. Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible PloS One. 11(10):e0164733
128. Barker T, Ekins P, Foxon T. 2007. The macro-economic rebound effect and the UK economy. Energy Policy 35(10):4935-46
129. Chitnis M, Sorrell S. 2015. Living up to expectations: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Econ. 52:S100-16
130. Hertwich EG. 2005. Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 9(1-2):85-98
131. Santarius T, Walnum HJ, Aall C, eds. 2016. Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies: New Perspectives on the Rebound Phenomenon. Cham, Switz. : Springer
132. Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J. 2012. The economics of degrowth. Ecol. Econ. 84:172-80
133. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, et al. 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747-56
134. Meyer B, Distelkamp M, Wolter MI. 2007. Material efficiency and economic-environmental sustainability. Results of simulations for Germany with the model PANTA RHEI. Ecol. Econ. 63(1):192-200
135. Giljum S, Behrens A, Hinterberger F, Lutz C, Meyer B. 2008. Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 11(3):204-16
136. European Commission. 2016. Study onModelling of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Raw Material Consumption. Luxemb., Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU
137. SchandlH, Poldy F, TurnerGM, Measham TG, Walker DH, Eisenmenger N. 2008. Australia's resource use trajectories. J. Ind. Ecol. 12(5-6):669-85
138. Hatfield-Dodds S, SchandlH, Newth D, ObersteinerM, Cai Y, et al. 2017. Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies. J. Clean. Prod. 144:403-14
139. Int. Panel Climate Change (IPCC), Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, et al. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of WorkingGroup III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Vol. 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
140. Bringezu S. 2015. Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material. Resources 4(1):25-54
141. Lettenmeier M, Liedtke C, Rohn H. 2014. Eight tons of material footprint-suggestion for a resource cap for household consumption in Finland. Resources 3(3):488-515
142. Ayres RU, Simonis UE, eds. 1994. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development, Vol. 376. New York: United Nations Univ.
143. Takiguchi H, Takemoto K. 2008. Japanese 3R policies based on material flow analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 12(5-6):792-98
144. Moriguchi Y. 2007. Material flow indicators to measure progress toward a sound material-cycle society. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 9(2):112-20
145. Greyson J. 2007. An economic instrument for zero waste, economic growth and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 15(13):1382-90
146. Mathews JA, Tan H. 2011. Progress toward a circular economy in China. J. Ind. Ecol. 15(3):435-57
147. Yong R. 2007. The circular economy in China. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 9(2):121-29
148. Xue B, Chen X, Geng Y, Guo X, Lu C, et al. 2010. Survey of officials' awareness on circular economy development in China: based on municipal and county level. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54(12):1296-302
149. Winans K, Kendall A, Deng H. 2017. The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68:825-33
150. ChertowMR. 2000. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 25(1):313-37
151. Stahel WR. 2016. The circular economy. Nature 531(7595):435
152. Haas W, Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Heinz M. 2015. How circular is the global economy An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and theWorld in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 19:765-77
153. Kovanda J. 2014. Incorporation of recycling flows into economy-wide material flow accounting and analysis: A case study for the Czech Republic. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 92:78-84
154. Bleischwitz R, Bettina B-W, Rainer L, Sören S, Henning WC, et al. 2009. Outline of a resource policy and its economic dimension. See Ref. 174, pp. 2216-98
155. Jackson T, Victor PA. 2016. Does slow growth lead to rising inequality Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecol. Econ. 121:206-19
156. Bringezu S, Potocnik J, SchandlH, LuY, Ramaswami A, et al. 2016. Multi-scale governance of sustainable natural resource use-challenges and opportunities for monitoring and institutional development at the national and global level. Sustainability 8(8):778
157. United Nations. 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations
158. Tukker A, Cohen M, Hubacek K, Mont O. 2010. Sustainable consumption and production. J. Ind. Ecol. 14(1):1-3
159. Pauliuk S, Arvesen A, StadlerK, Hertwich EG. 2017. Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nat. Clim. Change 7(1):13-20
160. Gerst MD, Graedel TE. 2008. In-use stocks of metals: status and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(19):7038-45
161. Gordon RB, Bertram M, Graedel TE. 2006. Metal stocks and sustainability. PNAS 103(5):1209-14
162. Kleijn R, Huele R, Van Der Voet E. 2000. Dynamic substance flow analysis: The delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 32(2):241-54
163. WeiszH, Suh S, Graedel TE. 2015. Industrial ecology: The role ofmanufactured capital in sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(20):6260-64
164. Fishman T, Schandl H, Tanikawa H. 2016. Stochastic analysis and forecasts of the patterns of speed, acceleration, and levels of material stock accumulation in society. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(7):3729-37
165. SchillerG, Müller F, Ortlepp R. 2016. Mapping the anthropogenic stock inGermany:metabolic evidence for a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. In press
166. Tanikawa H, Fishman T, Okuoka K, Sugimoto K. 2015. The weight of society over time and space: A comprehensive account of the construction material stock of Japan, 1945-2010. J. Ind. Ecol. 19(5):778-91
167. Moriguchi Y, Hashimoto S. 2016. Material flow analysis and waste management. See Ref. 171, pp. 247-62
168. Giljum S, WielandH, Lutter S, BrucknerM, Wood R, et al. 2016. Identifying priority areas for European resource policies: A MRIO-based material footprint assessment. J. Econ. Struct. 5(1):1-24
169. Godar J, Persson UM, Tizado EJ, Meyfroidt P. 2015. Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: Tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption. Ecol. Econ. 112:25-35
170. Huysman S, Schaubroeck T, Dewulf J. 2014. Quantification of spatially differentiated resource footprints for products and services through a macro-economic and thermodynamic approach. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(16):9709-16
171. Clift R, Druckman A, eds. 2016. Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology. Cham, Switz. : Springer
172. Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Winiwarter V, eds. Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Cham, Switz. : Springer
173. Bleischwitz R, Welfens PJJ, Zhang ZX, eds. 2009. Sustainable Growth and Resource Productivity: Economic and Global Policy Issues. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publ.
174. Bringezu S, Bleischwitz R. 2009. Sustainable Resource Management: Global Trends, Visions and Policies. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publ.
175. Hák T, Moldan B, Dahl AL. 2007. Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press