Erratum: SI Correction Sustainability Science (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2023) 112 (6271–6276) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220362110);The material footprint of nations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 6271-6276

  Wiedmann, Thomas O ^a,b,c   Schandl, Heinz ^b,d   Lenzen, Manfred ^c   Moran, Daniel ^c,e   Suh, Sangwon ^f   West, James ^b   Kanemoto, Keiichiro ^c,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Multiregion input output; Raw material consumption; Sustainable resource management

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GOVERNMENT; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 84929409455     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319720120     Document Type: Erratum

References (61)

1. European Commission (2011) Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011)571 Final (European Commission, Brussels).
2. National Research Council (2008) Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
3. Eurostat (2012) Sustainable Development Indicators (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
4. OECD (2011) Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress (OECD Indicators) (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris).
5. UNEP (2011) Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi).
6. Bringezu S, Bleischwitz R (2009) Sustainable Resource Management - Global Trends, Visions and Policies (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, U.K).
7. Eurostat (2012) Eurostat Material Flow Accounts Dataset: Resource Productivity. (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
8. OECD (2011) Resource Productivity in the G8 and the OECD - A Report in the Framework of the Kobe 3R Action Plan (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris).
9. 2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(12):5687-5692.
10. Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6414-6420.
11. Wiedmann T, et al. (2010) A carbon footprint time series of the UK: Results from a multiregion input-output model. Economic Systems Research 22(1):19-42.
12. Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environ Change, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006.
13. Weinzettel J, Hertwich EG, Peters GP, Steen-Olsen K, Galli A (2013) Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Glob Environ Change 23(2):433-438.
14. Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin AE, Hertwich EG (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):10883-10891.
15. Feng K, Chapagain A, Suh S, Pfister S, Hubacek K (2011) Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprints of nations. Econ Syst Res 23(4):371-385.
16. Lenzen M, et al. (2013) International trade of scarce water. Ecol Econ 94:78-85.
17. Galli A, et al. (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16:100-112.
18. Lenzen M, et al. (2012) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486(7401):109-112.
19. Peters GP (2010) Policy update: Managing carbon leakage. Carbon Management 1(1):35-37.
20. Dittrich M, Bringezu S (2010) The physical dimension of international trade, part 1:Direct global flows between 1962 and 2005. Ecol Econ 69(9):1838-1847.
21. Dittrich M, Giljum S, Lutter S, Polzin C (2012) Green Economies Around the World? Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment. (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna).
22. Krausmann F, Fischer-Kowalski M, Schandl H, Eisenmenger N (2008) The global sociometabolic transition. J Ind Ecol 12(5-6):637-656.
23. th century. Ecol Econ 68(10):2696-2705.
24. Schandl H, West J (2010) Resource use and resource efficiency in the Asia-Pacific region. Glob Environ Change 20(4):636-647.
25. Steger S, Bleischwitz R (2011) Drivers for the use of materials across countries. J Clean Prod 19(8):816-826.
26. Steinberger JK, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N (2010) Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis. Ecol Econ 69(5):1148-1158.
27. Dittrich M, Bringezu S, Schütz H (2012) The physical dimension of international trade, part 2: Indirect global resource flows between 1962 and 2005. Ecol Econ 79:32-43.
28. Muñoz P, Giljum S, Roca J (2009) The raw material equivalents of international trade. J Ind Ecol 13(6):881-897.
29. Weinzettel J, Kovanda J (2009) Assessing socioeconomic metabolism through hybrid life cycle assessment - The case of the Czech Republic. J Ind Ecol 13(4):607-621.
30. Weinzettel J, Kovanda J (2011) Structural decomposition analysis of raw material consumption - The case of the Czech Republic. J Ind Ecol 15(6):893-907.
31. Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C, Wiebe KS (2012) Materials embodied in international trade - Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005. Glob Environ Change 22(3):568-576.
32. Wiebe KS, Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C, Polzin C (2012) Carbon and materials embodied in the international trade of emerging economies. J Ind Ecol 16(4):636-646.
33. Kovanda J, Weinzettel J (2013) The importance of raw material equivalents in economy-wide material flow accounting and its policy dimension. Environ Sci Policy 29:71-80.
34. Schoer K, Weinzettel J, Kovanda J, Giegrich J, Lauwigi C (2012) Raw material consumption of the European Union - Concept, calculation method, and results. Environ Sci Technol 46(16):8903-8909.
35. Kovanda J, van de Sand I, Schütz H, Bringezu S (2012) Economy-wide material flow indicators: Overall framework, purposes and uses and comparison of material use and resource intensity of the Czech Republic, Germany and the EU-15. Ecol Indic 17:88-98.
36. Moran DD, Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Geschke A (2013) Does ecologically unequal exchange occur? Ecol Econ 89:177-186.
37. Eurostat (2001) Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
38. Eurostat (2011) Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA): Compilation Guidelines for Eurostat's 2011 EW-MFA Questionnaire (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
39. Fischer-Kowalski M, et al. (2011) Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting. J Ind Ecol 15(6):855-876.
40. Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D, Geschke A (2012) Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):8374-8381.
41. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Steger S, Baudisch J (2004) International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth. Ecol Econ 51(1-2):97-124.
42. Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(21):8903-8908.
43. Schandl H, West J (2012) Material flows and material productivity in China, Australia, and Japan. J Ind Ecol 16(3):352-364.
44. Muradian R, Walter M, Martinez-Alier J (2012) Hegemonic transitions and global shifts in social metabolism: Implications for resource-rich countries. Introduction to the special section. Glob Environ Change 22(3):559-567.
45. Gierlinger S, Krausmann F (2012) The physical economy of the United States of America. J Ind Ecol 16(3):365-377.
46. Steinberger JK, Krausmann F (2011) Material and energy productivity. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1169-1176.
47. Schandl H, Turner GM (2009) The dematerialization potential of the Australian economy. J Ind Ecol 13(6):863-880.
48. Hashimoto S, et al. (2008) What factors have changed Japanese resource productivity? J Ind Ecol 12(5-6):657-668.
49. Kovanda J, Hak T (2008) Changes in materials use in transition economies. J Ind Ecol 12(5-6):721-738.
50. Weisz H, Schandl H (2008) Materials use across world regions-Inevitable pasts and possible futures. J Ind Ecol 12(5-6):629-636.
51. Wood R (2009) Structural decomposition analysis of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 37(11):4943-4948.
52. Lenzen M, et al. (2006) A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy 31(2-3):181-207.
53. Wiedmann T, Minx J, Barrett J, Wackernagel M (2006) Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecol Econ 56(1):28-48.
54. Lenzen M, Foran B (2001) An input-output analysis of Australian water usage. Water Policy 3:321-340.
55. Wood R, Lenzen M, Foran B (2009) A material history of Australia-Evolution of material intensity and drivers of change. J Ind Ecol 13(6):847-862.
56. Krausmann F, Erb K-H, Gingrich S, Lauk C, Haberl H (2008) Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol Econ 65(3):471-487.
57. Müller DB, Wang T, Duval B (2011) Patterns of iron use in societal evolution. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):182-188.
58. Giljum S, Behrens A, Hinterberger F, Lutz C, Meyer B (2008) Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 11(3):204-216.
59. Bleischwitz R (2010) International economics of resource productivity - Relevance, measurement, empirical trends, innovation, resource policies. Int Econ Econ Policy 7(2-3):227-244.
60. Ausubel JH, Waggoner PE (2008) Dematerialization: Variety, caution, and persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(35):12774-12779.
61. Leontief W (1970) Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An inputoutput approach. Rev Econ Stat 52(3):262-271.