Author Correction: Red fox genome assembly identifies genomic regions associated with tame and aggressive behaviours (Nature Ecology & Evolution, (2018), 2, 9, (1479-1491), 10.1038/s41559-018-0611-6);Red fox genome assembly identifies genomic regions associated with tame and aggressive behaviours

Nature Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 2, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 1479-1491

  Kukekova, Anna V ^a   Johnson, Jennifer L ^a   Xiang, Xueyan ^b   Feng, Shaohong ^b   Liu, Shiping ^b   Rando, Halie M ^a   Kharlamova, Anastasiya V ^c   Herbeck, Yury ^c   Serdyukova, Natalya A ^d   Xiong, Zijun ^b,e   Beklemischeva, Violetta ^d   Koepfli, Klaus Peter ^f,g   Gulevich, Rimma G ^c   Vladimirova, Anastasiya V ^c   Hekman, Jessica P ^a,l   Perelman, Polina L ^d,h   Graphodatsky, Aleksander S ^d,h   O’Brien, Stephen J ^g,i   Wang, Xu ^j,m   Clark, Andrew G ^j   Acland, Gregory M ^j   Trut, Lyudmila N ^c   Zhang, Guojie ^b,e,k   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^d INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^e KUNMING INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^f SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^h NOVOSIBIRSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

ⁱ NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^l BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^m AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOX; GENOME; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; FOXES; GENOME; MALE;

EID: 85051462033     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2397334X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0664-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (130)

1. Wayne, R. K. et al. Molecular systematics of the Canidae. Syst. Biol. 46, 622–653 (1997)
2. Macdonald, D. W. & Reynolds, J. in Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (eds Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M. & Macdonald, D. W.) 129–136 (IUCN, Gland, 2004)
3. Baker, P. J., Funk, S. M., Harris, S. & White, P. C. Flexible spatial organization of urban foxes, Vulpes vulpes, before and during an outbreak of sarcoptic mange. Anim. Behav. 59, 127–146 (2000)
4. Deplazes, P., Hegglin, D., Gloor, S. & Romig, T. Wilderness in the city: the urbanization of Echinococcus multilocularis. Trends Parasitol. 20, 77–84 (2004)
5. Doncaster, C. P. & Macdonald, D. W. Drifting territoriality in the red fox Vulpes Vulpes. J. Anim. Ecol. 60, 423–439 (1991)
6. Harris, S. & Smith, G. Demography of two urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 24, 75–86 (1987)
7. Lindblad-Toh, K. et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438, 803–819 (2005)
8. Wang, G. D. et al. Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res. 26, 21–33 (2016)
9. Maher, L. A. et al. A unique human-fox burial from a pre-Natufian cemetery in the Levant (Jordan). PLoS ONE 6, e15815 (2011)
10. Morey, D. Dogs: Domestication and the Development of a Social Bond (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2010)
11. Westwood, R. Early fur-farming in Utah. Utah Hist. Quart. 57, 320–339 (1989)
12. Diamond, J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700–707 (2002)
13. Petersen, M. The Fur Traders and Fur Bearing Animals (Hammond, Buffalo, 1914)
14. Nes, N. N., Einarsson, E. J., Lohi, O. & Joergensen, G. Beautiful Fur Animals: Their Colour Genetics (Scientifur, Oslo, 1988)
15. Bespyatih, O. The consequences of amber acid feeding in different genotypes of farm-bred foxes. VOGIS 13, 639–646 (2009)
16. Statham, M. J. et al. On the origin of a domesticated species: identifying the parent population of Russian silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 103, 168–175 (2011)
17. Statham, M. J., Sacks, B. N., Aubry, K. B., Perrine, J. D. & Wisely, S. M. The origin of recently established red fox populations in the United States: translocations or natural range expansions? J. Mammal. 93, 52–65 (2012)
18. Belyaev, D. K. Domestication of animals. Sci. J. 5, 47–52 (1969)
19. Belyaev, D. K. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J. Hered. 70, 301–308 (1979)
20. Trut, L. N. The genetics and phenogenetics of domestic behaviour. In Proc. XIV Int. Cong. Genet. Vol. 2 (ed. Belyaev, D. K.) 123–137 (Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1980)
21. Trut, L. N. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. Am. Sci. 87, 160–169 (1999)
22. Trut, L. N., Plyusnina, I. Z. & Oskina, I. N. An experiment on fox domestication and debatable issues of evolution of the dog. Genetika 40, 644–655 (2004)
23. Trut, L., Oskina, I. & Kharlamova, A. Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model. Bioessays 31, 349–360 (2009)
24. Hare, B. et al. Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr. Biol. 15, 226–230 (2005)
25. Kukekova, A. V. et al. Measurement of segregating behaviors in experimental silver fox pedigrees. Behav. Genet. 38, 185–194 (2008)
26. Kukekova, A. V. et al. Mapping loci for fox domestication: deconstruction/reconstruction of a behavioral phenotype. Behav. Genet. 41, 593–606 (2011)
27. Wipf, L. & Shackelford, R. M. Chromosomes of the red fox. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 28, 265–268 (1942)
28. Belyaev, D., Volobuev, V., Radzhabli, S. & Trut, L. Supernumary chromosome polymorphism and mosaicism in silver foxes. Genet. 10, 58–67 (1974)
29. Yang, F. et al. A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. Genomics 62, 189–202 (1999)
30. Yang, F. et al. Chromosome identification and assignment of DNA clones in the dog using a red fox and dog comparative map. Chromosome Res. 8, 93–100 (2000)
31. Kukekova, A. V. et al. A meiotic linkage map of the silver fox, aligned and compared to the canine genome. Genome Res. 17, 387–399 (2007)
32. Becker, S. E. et al. Anchoring the dog to its relatives reveals new evolutionary breakpoints across 11 species of the Canidae and provides new clues for the role of B chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 19, 685–708 (2011)
33. Graphodatsky, A. S. et al. Phylogenomics of the dog and fox family (Canidae, Carnivora) revealed by chromosome painting. Chromosome Res. 16, 129–143 (2008)
34. Li, R. et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 20, 265–272 (2010)
35. Kukekova, A. V., Temnykh, S. V., Johnson, J. L., Trut, L. N. & Acland, G. M. Genetics of behavior in the silver fox. Mamm. Genome 23, 164–177 (2012)
36. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987)
37. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000)
38. Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587 (2003)
39. Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 574–578 (2007)
40. Hubisz, M. J., Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 1322–1332 (2009)
41. Mi, H., Poudel, S., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D336–D342 (2016)
42. Axelsson, E. et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495, 360–364 (2013)
43. Freedman, A. H. et al. Demographically-based evaluation of genomic regions under selection in domestic dogs. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005851 (2016)
44. von Holdt, B. M. et al. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464, 898–902 (2010)
45. Wang, G. D. et al. The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans. Nat. Commun. 4, 1860 (2013)
46. Nelson, R. M. et al. Genetics of interactive behavior in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Behav. Genet. 47, 88–101 (2017)
47. Abrahams, B. S. et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol. Autism 4, 36 (2013)
48. Douglas, L. N., McGuire, A. B., Manzardo, A. M. & Butler, M. G. High-resolution chromosome ideogram representation of recognized genes for bipolar disorder. Gene. 586, 136–147 (2016)
49. Scherer, S. & Osborne, L. in Genomic Disorders: The Genomic Basis of Disease (eds Lupski, J. R. & Stankiewicz, P.) 221–236 (Humana, Totowa, 2006)
50. Freudenberg, F., Carreno Gutierrez, H., Post, A. M., Reif, A. & Norton, W. H. Aggression in non-human vertebrates: genetic mechanisms and molecular pathways. Am. J. Med. Genet. B 171, 603–640 (2015)
51. Takahashi, A., Quadros, I. M., de Almeida, R. M. & Miczek, K. A. Behavioral and pharmacogenetics of aggressive behavior. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 12, 73–138 (2012)
52. Adzhubei, I. A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249 (2010)
53. Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M. J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005)
54. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995)
55. Johnson, J. L. et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) detects genetic structure and confirms behavioral QTL in tame and aggressive foxes (Vulpes vulpes). PLoS ONE 10, e0127013 (2015)
56. Sheng, Z., Pettersson, M. E., Honaker, C. F., Siegel, P. B. & Carlborg, O. Standing genetic variation as a major contributor to adaptation in the Virginia chicken lines selection experiment. Genome Biol. 16, 219 (2015)
57. Heyne, H. O. et al. Genetic influences on brain gene expression in rats selected for tameness and aggression. Genetics 198, 1277–1290 (2014)
58. Kharlamova, A. V., Chase, K., Lark, K. G. & Trut, L. N. Variation of skeletal parameters in silver fox (Vulpes vulpes), selected for behavior, and in domestic dog (Canis familiaris). VOGIS 12, 32–38 (2008)
59. Trut, L. N., Dzerzhinskii, F. & Nikol’skii, V. S. Intracranial allometry and craniologic changes during domestication of silver foxes. Genetika 27, 1605–1611 (1991)
60. Trut, L. N. et al. in The Dog and its Genome (eds Ostrander, E., Giger, U. & Lindblad-Toh, K.) 81–96 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 2006)
61. Wilkins, A. S., Wrangham, R. W. & Fitch, W. T. The “domestication syndrome” in mammals: a unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. Genetics 197, 795–808 (2014)
62. Wright, D. The genetic architecture of domestication in animals. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 9, 11–20 (2015)
63. Oskina, I. N., Shikhevich, S. G. & Gulevich, R. G. Relationship between behavioral selection and primary and secondary immune response in wild gray rats. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 136, 404–407 (2003)
64. Idova, G. et al. Immune reactivity in rats selected for the enhancement or elimination of aggressiveness towards humans. Neurosci. Lett. 609, 103–108 (2015)
65. Oskina, I., Herbeck, Y., Shikhevich, S., Plyusnina, I. & Gulevich, R. Alterations in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal and immune systems during selection of animals for tame behavior. VOGIS 12, 39–49 (2008)
66. Laundeslager, M. L. & Kennedy, S. in Psychoneuroimmunology Vol. 1 (ed. Ader, R.) 475–496 (Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, 2007)
67. Mommersteeg, P. M., Vermetten, E., Kavelaars, A., Geuze, E. & Heijnen, C. J. Hostility is related to clusters of T-cell cytokines and chemokines in healthy men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33, 1041–1050 (2008)
68. Miller, G. E. et al. Low early-life social class leaves a biological residue manifested by decreased glucocorticoid and increased proinflammatory signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14716–14721 (2009)
69. Patel, A., Siegel, A. & Zalcman, S. S. Lack of aggression and anxiolytic-like behavior in TNF receptor (TNF-R1 and TNF-R2) deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 24, 1276–1280 (2010)
70. Waltes, R., Chiocchetti, A. G. & Freitag, C. M. The neurobiological basis of human aggression: a review on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Am. J. Med. Genet. B 171, 650–675 (2016)
71. Hermey, G. The Vps10p-domain receptor family. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 66, 2677–2689 (2009)
72. Savas, J. N. et al. The sorting receptor SorCS1 regulates trafficking of neurexin and AMPA receptors. Neuron 87, 764–780 (2015)
73. Ramanathan, S. et al. A case of autism with an interstitial deletion on 4q leading to hemizygosity for genes encoding for glutamine and glycine neurotransmitter receptor sub-units (AMPA 2, GLRA3, GLRB) and neuropeptide receptors NPY1R, NPY5R. BMC Med. Genet. 5, 10 (2004)
74. Südhof, T. C. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 455, 903–911 (2008)
75. Rujescu, D. et al. Disruption of the neurexin 1 gene is associated with schizophrenia. Human. Mol. Genet. 18, 988–996 (2009)
76. Gauthier, J. et al. Truncating mutations in NRXN2 and NRXN1 in autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Human. Genet. 130, 563–573 (2011)
77. Gregor, A. et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum associated with defects in CNTNAP2 and NRXN1. BMC Med. Genet. 12, 106 (2011)
78. Tarabeux, J. et al. Rare mutations in N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors in autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Transl. Psychiatry 1, e55 (2011)
79. Reichelt, A. C., Rodgers, R. J. & Clapcote, S. J. The role of neurexins in schizophrenia and autistic spectrum disorder. Neuropharmacology 62, 1519–1526 (2012)
80. Sanders, S. J. et al. De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485, 237–241 (2012)
81. Soto, D., Altafaj, X., Sindreu, C. & Bayes, A. Glutamate receptor mutations in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Commun. Integr. Biol. 7, e27887 (2014)
82. Bhat, S. et al. CACNA1C (Cav1.2) in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disease. Progress. Neurobiol. 99, 1–14 (2012)
83. Carneiro, M. et al. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science 345, 1074–1079 (2014)
84. Li, Y. et al. Domestication of the dog from the wolf was promoted by enhanced excitatory synaptic plasticity: a hypothesis. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 3115–3121 (2014)
85. Montague, M. J. et al. Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17230–17235 (2014)
86. vonHoldt, B. M. et al. Structural variants in genes associated with human Williams-Beuren syndrome underlie stereotypical hypersociability in domestic dogs. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700398 (2017)
87. Pober, B. R. Williams-Beuren syndrome. New Engl. J. Med. 362, 239–252 (2010)
88. Kukekova, A. V., Trut, L. N. & Acland, G. M. in Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals (eds Grandin, T. & Deesing, M.) 361 – 396 (Elsevier, 2014)
89. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 2001)
90. Dodt, M., Roehr, J. T., Ahmed, R. & Dieterich, C. FLEXBAR-flexible barcode and adapter processing for next-generation sequencing platforms. Biology 1, 895–905 (2012)
91. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009)
92. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012)
93. Li, R. et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 463, 311–317 (2010)
94. Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D. & Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578–579 (2011)
95. Li, R. et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25, 1966–1967 (2009)
96. Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988–995 (2004)
97. Stanke, M., Steinkamp, R., Waack, S. & Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W309–W312 (2004)
98. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009)
99. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012)
100. Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45–48 (2000)
101. Zdobnov, E. M. & Apweiler, R. InterProScan–an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17, 847–848 (2001)
102. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000)
103. Li, G. et al. Comparative analysis of mammalian Y chromosomes illuminates ancestral structure and lineage-specific evolution. Genome Res. 23, 1486–1495 (2013)
104. Frith, M. C., Hamada, M. & Horton, P. Parameters for accurate genome alignment. BMC Bioinform. 11, 80 (2010)
105. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009)
106. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010)
107. DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011)
108. Van der Auwera, G. et al. From FastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 43, 11.10.1–11.10.33 (2013)
109. Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Bioinform. 15, 356 (2014)
110. Durand, E. Y., Patterson, N., Reich, D. & Slatkin, M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2239–2252 (2011)
111. Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 324, 522–528 (2009)
112. Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005)
113. Rubin, C. J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464, 587–591 (2010)
114. Qanbari, S. et al. A high resolution genome-wide scan for significant selective sweeps: an application to pooled sequence data in laying chickens. PLoS ONE 7, e49525 (2012)
115. Karlsson, E. K. et al. Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nat. Genet. 39, 1321–1328 (2007)
116. Weir, B. S. & Hill, W. G. Estimating F-statistics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 721–750 (2002)
117. Kessner, D. & Novembre, J. forqs: forward-in-time simulation of recombination, quantitative traits and selection. Bioinformatics 30, 576–577 (2014)
118. Harris, R. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State Univ. (2007)
119. Uhlen, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015)
120. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011)
121. 1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012)
122. Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P. & Rohl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48 (1999)
123. Stanyon, R. & Galleni, L. A rapid fibroblast culture technique for high resolution karyotypes. Bolletino di Zool. 58, 81–83 (1990)
124. Graphodatsky, A. S. et al. Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Calomyscus. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 88, 296–304 (2000)
125. Graphodatsky, A. S. et al. Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 92, 243–247 (2001)
126. Seabright, M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2, 971–972 (1971)
127. Sumner, A. T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 75, 304–306 (1972)
128. Makinen, A. The standard karyotype of the silver for (Vulpes fulvus Desm.). Committee for the standard karyotype of Vulpes fulvus Desm. Hereditas 103, 171–176 (1985)
129. Trifonov, V. A. et al. Complex structure of B-chromosomes in two mammalian species: Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) and Nyctereutes procyonoides (Carnivora). Chromosome Res. 10, 109–116 (2002)
130. Nie, W. et al. The genome phylogeny of domestic cat, red panda and five mustelid species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and G-banding. Chromosome Res. 10, 209–222 (2002)