Correction to: Difficult debriefing situations: A toolbox for simulation educators (Medical Teacher, (2018), 40, 7, (703-712), 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1468558);Difficult debriefing situations: A toolbox for simulation educators

Medical Teacher

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 703-712

  Grant, V J ^a,b   Robinson, T ^b   Catena, H ^b   Eppich, W ^c   Cheng, A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; PHENOTYPE; SIMULATION; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; EMOTION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT SIMULATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SIMULATION TRAINING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EMOTIONS; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; PATIENT SIMULATION; SIMULATION TRAINING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 85047338811     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1482445     Document Type: Erratum

References (75)

1. Abrams J., 2009. Having hard conversations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin.
2. Baker WH., 1980. Defensiveness in communication: its causes, effects, and cures. J Bus Commun (1973). 17:33–43.
3. Banja JD, Craig K., 2010. Speaking up in case management. Part II: implementing speaking up behaviors. Prof Case Manag. 15:237–242.
4. Bickel J, Rosenthal SL., 2011. Difficult issues in mentoring: recommendations on making the "Undiscussable" discussable. Acad Med. 86:1229–1234.
5. Blanchard K., 2014. Turning conflict into creativity. Train J. 29–32.
6. Boet S, Bould MD, Sharma B, Revees S, Naik VN, Triby E, Grantcharov T., 2013. Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 258:53–58.
7. Cartwright T., 2003. Managing conflict with peers. Greensboro (NC): Center for Creative Leadership.
8. Chen FS, Minson JA, Schöne M, Heinrichs M., 2013. In the eye of the beholder: eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psychol Sci. 24:2254–2261.
9. Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook D., 2014. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 48:657–666.
10. Cheng A, Hunt EA, Donaghue A, Nelson-McMillan K, Nishisaki A, Leflore J, Eppich W, Moyer M, Brett-Fleegler M, Kleinman M, et al. 2013. Examining pediatric resuscitation education using simulation and scripted debriefing: a multi-center randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr. 167:528–536.
11. Cheng A, Lang T, Starr S, Pusic M, Cook D., 2014. Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 133:e1313–e1323.
12. Chung HS, Dieckmann P, Issenberg SB., 2013. It is time to consider cultural differences in debriefing. Simul Healthc. 8:166–170.
13. Clark MC, Dirkx JM., 2008. The emotional self in adult learning. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. 120:89–96.
14. Cobb N., 2007. How to overcome defensiveness; [accessed 2015 May 15]. https://www.nathancobb.com/support-files/overcoming-defensivess.pdf.
15. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hatala R., 2013. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 35:e867–e898.
16. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ., 2011. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 306:978–988.
17. Corrigan PT., 2011. Silence in progressive teaching. Encounter. 24:8–11.
18. Dankoski ME, Bickel J, Gusic ME., 2014. Discussing the undiscussable with the powerful: why and how faculty must learn to counteract organizational silence. Acad Med. 89:1610–1613.
19. Davies M, Lamb S, Doecke E., 2011. Strategic review of effective re-engagement models for disengaged learners. Melbourne: Centre for Research on Education Systems–University of Melbourne.
20. Detert JR, Edmondson AC., 2011. Implicit voice theories: taken-for granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad Manage J. 54:461–488.
21. D'Souza D., 2011. Engaging the quiet learner: a seminar for the center for teaching excellence. Boston (MA): Suffolk University; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://www2.suffolk.edu/files/CTE/quiet_learner_handout.pdf.
22. Edmondson AC, Smith DM., 2006. Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict. Calif Manage Rev. 49:6–31.
23. Edmondson AC., 2003. Framing for learning: lessons in successful technology implementation. Calif Manage Rev. 45:34–54.
24. Edmondson AC., 2012. Teaming: how organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco (CA): Wiley & Sons.
25. Eppich W, Cheng A., 2015. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 10:106–115.
26. Fanning RM, Gaba DM., 2007. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2:115–125.
27. Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Beh P, van der Vleuten CPM., 2014. Quiet or questioning? Students' discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures. Stud High Educ. 39:1001–1021.
28. Fraser K, Huffman J, Ma I, Sobczak M, McIlwrick J, Wright B, McLaughlin K., 2014. The emotional and cognitive impact of unexpected simulated patient death: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 145:958–963.
29. Fredrickson BL, Branigan C., 2005. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cogn Emot. 19:313–332.
30. Fredrickson BL., 2004. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos Trans R Soc B. 359:1367–1378.
31. Gallagher R., 2009a. How to tell anyone anything: breakthrough techniques for handling difficult conversations at work. New York (NY): American Management Association.
32. Gallagher RS., 2009b. A “Candid” Approach to difficult conversations; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://www.amanet.org/training/articles/A-CANDID-Approach-to-Difficult-Conversations.aspx.
33. Gamble TK, Gamble MW., 2014. Interpersonal communication: building connections together. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications Inc.
34. Grimsley A., 2010. Vital conversations: a practical approach to handling difficult conversations, managing conflict, giving feedback, and influencing difficult people. London (UK): Barnes Holland Publishing.
35. Hall K., 2012a. Understanding validation: a way to communicate acceptance; [accessed 2015 May 15]. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/pieces-mind/201204/understanding-validation-way-communicate-acceptance.
36. Hall K., 2012b. What is validation and why do I need to know? [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://blogs.psychcentral.com/emotionally-sensitive/2012/02/levels-of-validation/.
37. Hall KD, Cook M., 2012. The power of validation: arming your child against bullying, peer pressure, addiction, self-harm, and out-of-control emotions. Oakland (CA): New Harbinger Publications.
38. Harvey P, Ahmann E., 2014. Validation: a family-centered communication skill. Pediatr Nurs. 40:143–147.
39. Holmer LL., 2014. Understanding and reducing the impact of defensiveness on management learning: some lessons from neuroscience. J Manage Educ. 38:618–641.
40. Holyoke L, Larson E., 2009. Engaging the adult learner generational mix. J Adult Educ. 38:12–21.
41. Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, Nelson-McMillan KL, Bradshaw JH, Diener-West M, Perretta JS, Shilkofski NA., 2014. Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after “Rapid cycle deliberate practice” training. Resuscitation. 85:945–951.
42. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ., 2005. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 27:10–28.
43. Jacobs SC, Huprich SK, Grus CL, Cage EA, Elman NS, Forrest L, Schwartz-Mette R, Shen-Miller DS, Van Sickle KS, Kaslow NJ., 2011. Trainees with professional competency problems: preparing trainers for difficult but necessary conversations. Train Educ Prof Psychol. 5:175–184.
44. Kasworm CE., 2008. Emotional challenges of adult learners in higher education. New directions for adult and continuing education. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. 120:7–18.
45. Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, Knauth A, Dambach M, Spahn DR, Grande B., 2013. Teamgains: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf. 22:541–553.
46. Macdonald E., 2004. Difficult conversations in medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. McCrorie P., 2013. Teaching and leading small groups. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. West Sussex (UK): Wiley & Sons.
48. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ., 2010. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 44:50–63.
49. Mlodinow L., 2012. Subliminal: how your unconscious mind rules your behavior. New York (NY): Random House.
50. Northwestern University. [date unknown]. Basic skills and techniques in providing spiritual care. Chicago (IL): Northwestern University; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://endlink.lurie.northwestern.edu/religion_spirituality/part_four.pdf.
51. Ormond Coaching and Training. 2011. Effective communication skills: the art of communication; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://www.leadership-development-tips.com/effective-communication-skills.html.
52. Overton AR, Lowry AC., 2013. Conflict management: difficult conversations with difficult people. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 26:259–264.
53. Patterson K, Grenny J, McMillan R, Switzler A., 2012. Crucial conversations: tools for talking when stakes are high. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
54. Phrampus PE, O'Donnell JM., 2013. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Sim AJ, editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York (NY): Springer.
55. Polito J., 2013. Effective communication during difficult conversations. Neurodiagn J. 53:142–152.
56. Rabbetts J, Jones P., 2014. Difficult conversations. Train J. 28–31.
57. Raemer D, Anderson M, Cheng A, Fanning R, Nadkarni V, Savoldelli G., 2011. Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process. Simul Healthc. 6:S52–S57.
58. Reynolds M., 2014. The discomfort zone: how leaders turn difficult conversations into breakthroughs. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
59. Rienties B, Rivers BA., 2014. Measuring and understanding learner emotions: evidence and prospects; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://www.laceproject.eu/publications/learning-analytics-and-emotions.pdf.
60. Rudolph J, Simon R, Dufresne R, Raemer D., 2006. There's no such thing as “Nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 1:49–55.
61. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R., 2014. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 9:339–349.
62. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ., 2008. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 15:1010–1016.
63. Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A., 2016. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc. 11:209–217.
64. Sawyer TL, Deering S., 2013. Adaptation of the US army‘s after-action review for simulation debriefing in healthcare. Simul Healthc. 8:388–397.
65. Simon JR, Gluck MA., 2013. Adult age differences in learning and generalization of feedback-based associations. Psychol Aging. 28:937–947.
66. Stone D, Patton B, Heen S., 2010. Difficult conversations: how to discuss what matters. New York (NY): Penguin Books.
67. Tiberius RG., 2012. Small group teaching: a trouble-shooting guide. New York (NY): Routledge.
68. Ury W., 1993. Getting past no: negotiating your way from confrontation to cooperation. New York (NY): Bantam Books.
69. van der Leeuw RM., 2014. Sharing is caring: dealing with feedback and difficult feelings. Med Educ. 48:1034–1042.
70. Vanderbilt University Centre for Teaching. [date unknown]. Difficult dialogues. Nashville (TN): Vanderbilt University; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/difficult-dialogues/.
71. Wagner CC, Ingersoll KS, Contributors W., 2017. Phase iii: broadening perspectives. Motivational interviewing in groups. New York (NY): Guilford Publications.
72. Wagner CC, Ingersoll KS., 2008. Beyond cognition: broadening the emotional base of motivational interviewing. J Psychother Integr. 18:191–206.
73. Walker JE, Shea TM, Bauer AM., 2007. Generalization and the effects of consequences; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://www.education.com/reference/article/generalization-effects-consequences/.
74. Warren L., [date unknown]. Managing hot moments in the classroom. Boston (MA): Harvard University; [accessed 2015 May 15]. http://bokcenter.harvard.edu/hot-moments.
75. Zimmermann AC, Morgan WJ., 2016. A time for silence? Its possibilities for dialogue and for reflective learning. Stud Philos Educ. 35:399–413.