Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation the role of the presimulation briefing

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 339-349

  Rudolph, Jenny W ^a,b,c   Raemer, Daniel B ^a,b,c   Simon, Robert ^a,b,c  

^a Center for Medical Simulation Cambridge   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Debriefing; Education; Prebrief; Psychological safety; Realism

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SIMULATION; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING;

EID: 84919497137     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Darling M, Parry C, Moore J. Learning in the thick of it. Harv Bus Rev 2005;83(7):84-92.
2. Baker AC, Jensen PJ, Kolb DA. In conversation: transforming experience into learning. Simul Gaming 1997;28:6-12.
3. Lederman LC. Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gaming 1992;23(2):145-160.
4. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, et al. There's no such thing as a "non-judgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1(1):49-55.
5. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
6. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007;2(3):183-193.
7. Williams M. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: a threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Acad Manag Rev 2007;32(2):595-621.
8. Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, et al. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med 2011;86(9):1120-1127.
9. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, et al. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med 2010;85(7):1212-1220.
10. Dismukes RK, McDonnell LK, Jobe KK. Facilitating LOFT debriefings: instructor techniques and crew participation. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000;10:35-57.
11. Howard S, Gaba D, Fish K, et al. Anesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992;63(9):763-770.
12. Skinner EA, Belmont MJ.Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J Educ Psychol 1993;85(4):572.
13. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 1999;44:350-383.
14. Edmondson A. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 2002;46(4):685-716.
15. Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud 2003;40(6):1419-1452.
16. March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 1991;2(1):71-87.
17. Elliot AJ, Dweck CS. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York, NY: Guillford; 2005.
18. Vygotsky L. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
19. Bion WR. The psycho-analytic study of thinking. A theory of thinking. Int J Psychoanal 1962;43:306-310.
20. Modell AH. "The Holding Environment" and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1976;24(2):285-307.
21. Winnicott DW. Metapsychological and clinical aspects of regression within the psycho-analytical set-up. Int J Psychoanal 1955;36(1):16-26.
22. Bion WR. Learning From Experience. 7th ed. London, England: Karnac; 2005 [1962].
23. French RB. The teacher as container of anxiety: psychoanalysis and the role of teacher. J Manag Educ 1997;21(4):483-495.
24. Gilmore S, Anderson V. Anxiety and experience-based learning in a professional standards context. Manag Learn. 2012;43(1):75-95.
25. Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith DM. Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1985.
26. Argyris C. Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning.Wellesley, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1990.
27. Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB. Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag J 2006;49(2):235-262.
28. Ibarra H. Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation.Adm Sci Q 1999;44(4):764-791.
29. Zhao N. Learning from errors: the role of context, emotion, and personality. J Organ Behav 2011;32(3):435-463.
30. Fisher S. Stress and Strategy. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1986.
31. Blascovich J, Mendes WB, Hunter SB, et al. Social ?facilitation' as challenge and threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77(1):68-77.
32. Cottrell NB,Wack DL, Sekerak GJ, et al. Social facilitation of dominant responses by presence of others. J Pers Soc Psychol 1968;9: 245-250.
33. Zajonc RB. Social facilitation. Science 1968;149:269-274.
34. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc 2012;7(5):288-294.
35. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2005.
36. Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, Fisch R. Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York, NY: Horton; 1974.
37. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250(6):777-781.
38. Harlen W, James M. Assessment and learning: differences and relationship between formative and summative assessment. Assess Educ 1997;4(3):365-377.
39. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(1):45-53.
40. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005;331(7524):1064-1065.
41. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph JW, Eppich WJ, et al. Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH): assessment of the reliability of a debriefing instrument. Simul Healthc 2009;4(4):240-325.
42. Miller S. Why having control reduces stress: if I can stop the roller coaster, I don't want to get off. In: Garber J, Seligman M, eds. Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1980:71-95.
43. Dismukes RK, Smith GM. Facilitation and Debriefing in Aviation Training and Operations. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate; 2001.
44. Smith DM. Divide or Conquer: How Great Teams Turn Conflict Into Strength. New York, NY: Portfolio Penguin Group; 2008.
45. Issenberg BS, McGaghie WM, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulation that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27(1):10-28.
46. McDonnell LK, Jobe KK, Dismukes RK. Facilitating LOS Debriefings: A Training Manual. Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035-1000: NASA; 1997. DOT/FAA/AR-97/6.
47. Boyatzis RE, Smith ML, Blaize N. Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Acad Manag Learn Educ 2006;5(1):8-24.
48. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. Am Psychol 2001;56(3):218-226.
49. Black P, William D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ 1998;5(1):7-74.
50. Bloom B.Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1971.
51. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich W. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15(11):1110-1116.
52. Hattie J, Jaeger R. Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess Educ 1998;5(1):111-125.
53. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. The Transparency Framework. 2012. Available at: http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/TransparencyFramework.htm. Accessed December 10, 2012.
54. Eco U. Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
55. Rousseau DM. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
56. Nanji KC, Baca K, Raemer DB. The effect of an olfactory and visual cue on realism and engagement in a health care simulation experience. Simul Healthc 2013;8(3):143-147.
57. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB. Which reality matters? Questions on the Road to high engagement in healthcare simulation. Simul Healthc 2007;2(3):161-163.
58. Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm Sci Q 1981;26:501-524.
59. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
60. Herzberg F. One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harv Bus Rev 1987;67(6):4-16.
61. Miner JB. Organizational Behavior I: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe; 2005.
62. Kegan R, Lahey LL. How theWayWe Talk Can Change theWayWeWork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001.
63. Spradley JP. The Ethnographic Interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Javanovich College Publishers; 1979.
64. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 2005;16(4):409-421.
65. Morecroft JDW. Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manag Sci 1985;31(7):900-916.
66. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47(2):263-291.
67. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
68. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
69. Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Am Econ Rev 1990;80(1):204-217.
70. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol 1957;21(2):95-103.
71. Jack A, Boyatzis RE, Khawaja M, Passarelli A, Leckie R. Visioning in the brain: an fMRI study of inspirational coaching and mentoring. Social Neuroscience 2013;4(8):369-384.
72. Fredrickson BL, Branigana C. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cogn Emot 2003;19(3):313-332.
73. Freshwater D, Robertson C. Emotions and Needs. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press; 2002.
74. Winnicott D. The Family and Individual Development. London, England: Tavistock Publishers; 1965.
75. Schnarch DM. Constructing the Sexual Crucible: An Integration of Sexual and Marital Therapy. New York, NY: WW Norton & Co; 1991.
76. Bion WR. The psycho-analytic study of thinking. A theory of thinking. Int J Psychoanal 1962;43:306-310.
77. Bion WR. Learning From Experience. 7th ed. London, England: Karnac; 2005 [1962].
78. Bowen M. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson; 1994.
79. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 1999;44:350-383.
80. Edmondson A. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 2002;46(4):685-716.
81. Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud 2003;40(6):1419-1452.
82. Edmondson AE. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J Appl Behav Sci 1996;32(1):5-28.
83. Epstein RS. Keeping Boundaries: Maintaining Safety and Integrity in the Psychotherapeutic Process. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1994.
84. French RB. The teacher as container of anxiety: psychoanalysis and the role of teacher. J Manag Educ 1997; 21(4):483-495.
85. Modell AH. "The holding environment" and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1976;24(2):285-307.
86. Schnarch DM. Constructing the Sexual Crucible: An Integration of Sexual and Marital Therapy. New York, NY: WW Norton & Co; 1991.
87. Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm Sci Q 1981:26:501-524.
88. Williams M. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: a threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Acad Manag Rev 2007;32(2):595-621.
89. Winnicott D. The family and Individual Development. London, England: Tavistock Publishers; 1965.
90. Winnicott DW. Metapsychological and clinical aspects of regression within the psycho-analytical set-up. Int J Psychoanal 1955;36(1):16-26.
91. Zhao N. Learning from errors: the role of context, emotion, and personality. J Organ Behav 2011;32(3): 435-463.
92. Black P, William D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ 1998: 5(1):7-74.
93. Bloom B. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1971.
94. Boyatzis RE, Smith ML, Blaize N. Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Acad Manag Learn Educ 2006;5(1):8-24.
95. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
96. Dismukes RK, McDonnell LK, Jobe KK. Facilitating LOFT debriefings: instructor techniques and crew participation. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000;10:35-57.
97. Dismukes RK, Smith GM. Facilitation and Debriefing in Aviation Training and Operations. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate; 2001.
98. Dismukes RK, Jobe KK, McDonnell LK. LOFT debriefings: an analysis of instructor techniques and crew participation. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 1997.
99. McDonnell LK, Jobe KK, Dismukes RK. Facilitating LOS Debriefings: A Training Manual: NASA;1997. DOT/FAA/AR-97/6.
100. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. Am Psychol 2001;56(3):218-226.
101. Fredrickson BL, Branigana C. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought action repertoires . Cogn Emot.2003,19,3,313-332.
102. Harlen W, James M. Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assess Educ 1997;4(3):365-377.
103. Hattie J, Jaeger R. Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess Educ 1998;5(1): 111-125.
104. Issenberg BS, McGaghie WM, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulation that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27(1):10-28.
105. McDonnell LK, Jobe KK, Dismukes RK. Facilitating LOS Debriefings: A Training Manual. NASA; 1997.
106. Miller S. Why having control reduces stress: if I can stop the roller coaster, I don't want to get off. In: Garber J, Seligman M, eds. Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1980:71-95.
107. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. The Transparency Framework, Vol. 2012. Available at: http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/TransparencyFramework.htm.Accessed December 10, 2012.
108. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich W. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15(11): 1110-1116.
109. Smith DM. Divide or Conquer: How Great Teams Turn Conflict Into Strength. New York, NY: Portfolio Penguin Group; 2008.
110. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007;2(3):183-193.
111. Eco U. Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
112. Kagin SL, Lusebrink VB. The expressive therapies continuum. Art Psychother 1978;5:171-180.
113. Kirlik A. Brunswikian theory and method as a foundation for simulation-based research on clinical judgment. Simul Healthc 2010;5(5):255-259.
114. Nanji KC, Baca K, Raemer DB. The effect of an olfactory and visual cue on realism and engagement in a health care simulation experience. Simul Healthc 2013;8(3): 143-147.
115. Rousseau DM. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
116. Rousseau DM. The contracts of individuals and organizations. In: Staw LLCaBM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 15. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1993:1-43.
117. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
118. Herzberg F. One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harv Bus Rev 1987;67(6):4-16.
119. Alexander PA, Murphy PK. The research base for APA's learner-centered psychological principles. In: Lambert NM, McCombs BL, eds. How Students Learn: Reforming SchoolsThrough Learner-Centered Education.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998:25-60.
120. Boyatzis RE, Jack T, Cesaro R, Khawaja M, Passarelli A. Coaching with compassion: an fMRI study of coaching to the positive and negative emotional attractor. Acad Manag Proc 2010.
121. Fredrickson BL, Branigana C. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought action repertoires. Cogn Emot. 2003,19,3,313,332.
122. Friedman VJ, Lipshitz R. Teaching people to shift cognitive gears: overcoming resistance on the road to model II. J Appl Behav Sci 1992;28(1):118-136.
123. Friedman VJ, Rogers T. Action science: linking causal theory and meaning making in action research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H, eds. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London, England: Sage Publications Inc; 2008:252-265.
124. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
125. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
126. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47(2): 263-291.
127. Neisser U. Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976.
128. Kegan R, Lahey L. How the Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass; 2001.
129. Louis MR, Sutton RI. Switching cognitive gears: from habits of mind to active thinking. Hum Relat 1991; 44(1):55-76.
130. Morecroft JDW. Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manag Sci 1985;31(7): 900-916.
131. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J ConsultPsychol 1957;21(2): 95-103.
132. Spradley JP. The Ethnographic Interview. FortWorth, TX: Harcourt Brace Javanovich College Publishers; 1979.
133. Torbert WR. Learning From Experience: Toward Consciousness. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1972.
134. Torbert WR. The Power of Balance: Transforming Self, Society, and Scientific Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
135. Torbert WR, Associates. Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers; 2004.
136. SchönD. The Reflective Practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1983.
137. Schön D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
138. Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Am Econ Rev 1990;80(1):204-217.
139. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 2005;16(4):409-421.
140. Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, et al. Objective structured assessment of debriefing (OSAD): bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Ann Surg 2012;256(6): 982-988.
141. Baker AC, Jensen PJ, Kolb DA. In conversation: transforming experience into learning. Simul Gaming 1997; 28:6-12.
142. ChengA,RodgersD,Van der Jagt E, EppichW,O'Donnell J. Evolution the pediatric advanced life support course: enhanced learning with anew debriefing tool and a webbased module for PALS instructors. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012;13(5):589-595.
143. Darling M, Parry C, Moore J. Learning in the thick of it. Harv Bus Rev 2005;83(7):84-92.
144. Dieckmann P, Molin Friis S, Lippert A, Ostergaard D. The art and science of debriefing in simulation: ideal and practice. Med Teach 2009;31(7):e287Ye294.
145. Dismukes RK, McDonnell LK, Jobe KK. Facilitating LOFT debriefings: instructor techniques and crew participation. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000;10:35-57.
146. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2(2): 115-125.
147. Lederman LC. Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gaming 1992;23(2): 145-160.
148. Morrison JE, Meliza LL. Foundations of the After Action Review Process: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Science; 1999.
149. Raemer DB. Assessing and improving debriefing: a workshop using the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH). Clin Simul Nurs 2009; 5(3):S12YS12.
150. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as a "non-judgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006 2006;1(1):49-55.
151. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology 2006;105(2):279-285.
152. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, et al. The value of debriefing in simulation-based education: oral versus video-assisted feedback. Simul Healthc 2006;1(2).
153. Welke TM, LeBlanc VR, Savoldelli GL, et al. Personalized oral debriefing versus standardizedmultimedia instruction after patient crisis simulation. Anesth Analg 2009;109(1): 183-189.