Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1010-1016

  Rudolph, Jenny W ^a,b,c   Simon, Robert ^a,b,c   Raemer, Daniel B ^a,b,c   Eppich, Walter J ^d,e  

^a Center for Medical Simulation Cambridge   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Debriefing; Formative assessment; Formative evalution; Medical education; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EMOTION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SIMULATION;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL;

EID: 56849126502     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Gordon JA, Cooper J, Simon R, Raemer D, Rudolph J, Gray M. The Institute for Medical Simulation: a new resource for medical educators worldwide [abstract]. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(Suppl 6S):S22.
2. Darling M, Parry C, Moore J. Learning in the thick of it. Harv Bus Rev. 2005; 83:84-92.
3. Morrison JE, Meliza LL. Foundations of the after action review process. Special Report 42: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Science, 1999.
4. Dismukes RK, Smith GM. Facilitation and Debriefing in Aviation Training and Operations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001.
5. Bloom BS. Some theoretical issues relating to education evaluation. In: Tyler RW, (ed.) Educational Evaluation: New Role, New Means. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1969: pp 26-50.
6. Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler RW, Gagne RM, Scriven M, (eds.) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1967: pp 39-83.
7. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
8. Schön D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
9. Lederman LC. Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gam. 1992; 23:145-60.
10. Thiagarajan S. Using games for debriefing. Simul Gam. 1992; 23:161-73.
11. Baker AC, Jensen PJ, Kolb DA. In conversation: transforming experience into learning. Simul Gam. 1997; 28:6-12.
12. Raphael B, Wilson JP. Psychological Debriefing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
13. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2:115-25.
14. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as a "non-judgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006; 1:49-55.
15. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesth Clin. 2007; 25:361-76.
16. Black P, William D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ. 1998; 5:7-74.
17. Crooks TJ. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Rev Educ Res. 1988; 58:438-81.
18. Natriello G. The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educ Psychol. 1980; 22:155-75.
19. Torrance H, Pryor J. Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 1998.
20. Harlen W, James M. Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assess Educ: Principles, Policy and Practice 1997; 4:365-77.
21. Hattie J, Jaeger R. Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess Educ: Principles, Policy and Practice 1998; 5:111-25.
22. Pryor J, Crossouard B. A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxf Rev Educ. 2008; 34:1-20.
23. Ibarra H. Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Admin Sci Q. 1999; 44:764-91.
24. Foldy EG. Being all that you can be: identities and interactions in organizations. In: Proceedings from Academy of Management. Seattle, WA, August 3-6, 2003.
25. Bartunek JM. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: the example of a religious order. Admin Sci Q. 1984; 29:355-72.
26. Gentner D, Stevens AL. Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
27. Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith DM. Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
28. Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, Fisch R. Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York, NY: Horton, 1974.
29. Weick KE. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
30. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Org Sci. 2005; 16:409-21.
31. Edmondson AE. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J Appl Behav Sci. 1996; 32:5-28.
32. Snook SA. Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks Over Northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
33. Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner. The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2005.
34. Billow RM. Relational Psychotherapy: From Basic Concepts to Passion. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2003.
35. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin Sci Q. 1999; 44:350-83.
36. Schnarch DM. Constructing the Sexual Crucible: An Integration of Sexual and Marital Therapy. New York, NY: WW Norton & Co., 1991.
37. Satir V. Conjoint Family Therapy, 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, 1983.
38. Issenberg BS, McGaghie WM, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulation that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27:10-28.
39. van de Ridder MJM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WM, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008; 42:189-97.
40. Kegan R, Lahey LL. How The Way We Talk Can Change The Way We Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
41. Dale E. Audiovisual methods in teaching, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1969.
42. Merriam SB. Andragogy and self-directed learning: pillars of adult learning theory. New Direc Adult Contin Educ. 2001; 89:3-14.
43. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Cooper JB. Debriefing teamwork skills in high-fidelity simulation. In: DaRosa DA, (ed.) A Guidebook for Program Directors: The ACS/APDS Surgical Skills Curriculum: Phase III. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, 2008.