The sweetest punch: Effects of 3D-printed surface textures and graphic design on ice-cream evaluation

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 68, Issue , 2018, Pages 198-204

  Van Rompay, Thomas J L ^a   Kramer, Lisa Marie ^a   Saakes, Daniel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Food evaluation; Graphic design; Multi sensory design; Packaging design; Shape; Surface textures; Taste experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045886307     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barsalou, L.W., Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:4 (1999), 577–609.
2. Becker, L., Rompay, T.J.L., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Galetzka, M., Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 22 (2011), 17–23.
3. Berlyne, D.E., Aesthetics and psychobiology. 1971, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
4. Biggs, L., Juravle, G., Spence, C., Haptic exploration of plateware alters the perceived texture and taste of food. Food Quality and Preference 50 (2016), 129–134.
5. Bloch, P.H., Brunel, F.H., Arnold, T.J., Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2003), 551–565.
6. Boring, E.G., Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. 1942, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NJ.
7. Crisinel, A.S., Jacquier, C., Deroy, O., Spence, C., Composing with cross-modal correspondences: Music and odors in concert. Chemosensory Perception 6:1 (2013), 45–52.
8. Distel, H., Hudson, R., Judgement of odor intensity is influenced by subjects’ knowledge of the odor source. Chemical Senses 26:3 (2001), 247–251.
9. Heckler, S.E., Childers, T.L., The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research 18:4 (1992), 475–492.
10. Herz, R.S., von Clef, J., The influence of verbal labelling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions?. Perception 30:3 (2001), 381–391.
11. Hirschman, E., Solomon, M.R., Utilitarian, aesthetic, and familiarity responses to verbal versus visual advertisements. Advances in Consumer Research 11 (1984), 426–431.
12. Hummel, T., Delwiche, J.F., Schmidt, C., Hüttenbrink, K.B., Effects of the form of glasses on the perception of wine flavors: A study in untrained subjects. Appetite 41:2 (2003), 197–202.
13. Krishna, A., An Integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (2012), 332–351.
14. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., Metaphors we live by. 1980, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., Philosophy in the flesh. 1999, Basic Books, New York, NY.
16. Lee, A.Y., Labroo, A.A., The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 41 (2004), 151–165.
17. Lee, Y.H., Mason, C., Responses to information incongruence in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research 26:2 (1999), 156–169.
18. Ludden, G.D.S., Kudrowitz, B.M., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P., Surprise and humor in product design: Designing sensory metaphors in multiple modalities. Humor 25:3 (2012), 285–309.
19. Ludden, G.D.S., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P., Visual-tactual incongruities in products as sources of surprise. Empirical Studies of the Arts 27:1 (2009), 63–89.
20. Ludden, G.D.S., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P., Beyond surprise: A longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products. International Journal of Design 6:1 (2012), 1–10.
21. Maheswaran, D., Chaiken, S., Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:1 (1991), 13–25.
22. McDaniel, C., Baker, R.C., Convenience food packaging and the perception of product quality. Journal of Marketing 41:4 (1977), 57–58.
23. Meyers-Levy, J., Tybout, A.M., Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1989), 39–54.
24. Ngo, M.K., Misra, R., Spence, C., Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference 22:6 (2011), 567–572.
25. Okamoto, M., Wada, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Kimura, A., Dan, H., Masuda, T., Dan, I., Influences of food-name labels on perceived tastes. Chemical Senses 34:3 (2009), 187–194.
26. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., Cross-modal correspondences in product packaging. Assessing colour correspondences for potato chips (crisps). Appetite 57 (2011), 753–757.
27. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory texture of food. Food Quality and Preference 26:1 (2012), 67–73.
28. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 165–179.
29. Rao, A.R., Monroe, K.B., The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perception of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research 26:3 (1989), 351–357.
30. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P., Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004), 364–382.
31. Schifferstein, H.N., Cleiren, M., Capturing product experiences: A split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica 118:3 (2005), 293–318.
32. Silvia, P.J., Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts 23 (2005), 119–133.
33. Silvia, P.J., What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion 5 (2005), 89–102.
34. Spence, C., Multisensory packaging design: Color, shape, texture, sound, and smell. Burgess, P., (eds.) Integrating the packaging and product experience in food and beverages: A road-map to consumer satisfaction, 2016, Woodhead Publishing, 1–22.
35. Spence, C., Gallace, A., Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology & Marketing 28:3 (2011), 267–308.
36. Spence, C., Wan, X., Beverage perception and consumption: The influence of the container on the perception of the contents. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 206–212.
37. Stewart, P.C., Goss, E., Plate shape and colour interact to influence taste and quality judgements. Flavour Journal 8 (2013), 2–27.
38. Tu, Y., Yang, Z., Ma, C., Touching tastes: The haptic perception transfer of liquid food packaging materials. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 124–130.
39. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Finger, F., Saakes, D., Fenko, A., “See me, feel me”: Effects of 3D-printed surface patterns on beverage evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 62 (2017), 332–339.
40. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Hekkert, P., Saakes, D., Russo, B., Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. Acta Psychologica 119:3 (2005), 315–351.
41. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Ludden, G.D.S., Types of embodiment in design: The embodied foundations of meaning and affect in product design. International Journal of Design 9:1 (2015), 1–11.
42. Van Rompay, T.J., Pruyn, A.T., When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape-typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28:4 (2011), 599–610.
43. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Pruyn, A.T.H., Tieke, P., Symbolic meaning integration in design and its influence on product and brand evaluation. International Journal of Design 3:2 (2009), 19–26.
44. Velasco, C., Woods, A.T., Petit, O., Cheok, A.D., Spence, C., Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review. Food Quality and Preference 52 (2016), 17–26.
45. Vilanova, M., Vidal, P., Cortés, S., Effect of the glass shape on flavour perception of “toasted wine” from Ribeiro (NW Spain). Journal of Sensory Studies 23:1 (2008), 114–124.