“See me, feel me”: Effects of 3D-printed surface patterns on beverage evaluation

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 62, Issue , 2017, Pages 332-339

  van Rompay, Thomas J L ^a   Finger, Friederike ^a   Saakes, Daniel ^b   Fenko, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Beverage evaluation; Packaging design; Shape; Surface patterns; Taste experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008385973     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arnheim, R., Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. 1974, University of California, Berkeley.
2. Bar, M., Neta, M., Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science 17:8 (2006), 645–648.
3. Barsalou, L.W., Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:4 (1999), 577–609.
4. Becker, L., van Rompay, T.J., Schifferstein, H.N., Galetzka, M., Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 22:1 (2011), 17–23.
5. Berlyne, D.E., Conflict, arousal and curiosity. 1960, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Biggs, L., Juravle, G., Spence, C., Haptic exploration of plateware alters the perceived pattern and taste of food. Food Quality and Preference 50 (2016), 129–134.
7. Boring, E.G., Sensation ‬and ‬perception ‬in ‬the ‬history ‬of ‬experimental‬ psychology. 1942, Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.
8. Crisinel, A.S., Jacquier, C., Deroy, O., Spence, C., Composing with cross-modal correspondences: Music and odors in concert. Chemosensory Perception 6:1 (2013), 45–52.
9. Deliza, R., MacFie, H., Product packaging and branding. Frewer, L.J., Risvik, E., Schifferstein, H.N.J., (eds.) Food, people and society: A European perspective of consumers’ food choices, 2001, Springer, Berlin, 55–72.
10. Distel, H., Hudson, R., Judgement of odor intensity is influenced by subjects’ knowledge of the odor source. Chemical Senses 26:3 (2001), 247–251.
11. Garber, L.L., Hyatt, E.M., Starr, R.G., Placing food color experimentation into a valid consumer context. Journal of Food Products Marketing 7 (2001), 3–24.
12. Herz, R.S., von Clef, J., The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions?. Perception 30:3 (2001), 381–391.
13. Hirschman, E., Solomon, M.R., Utilitarian, aesthetic, and familiarity responses to verbal versus visual advertisements. Advances in Consumer Research 11 (1984), 426–431.
14. Huber, J., McCann, J., The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (1982), 324–333.
15. Krishna, A., An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22:3 (2012), 332–351.
16. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., Metaphors we live by. 1980, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
17. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., Philosophy in the flesh. 1999, Basic Books, New York, NY.
18. Lee, A.Y., Labroo, A.A., The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 41 (2004), 151–165.
19. Ngo, M.K., Misra, R., Spence, C., Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference 22:6 (2011), 567–572.
20. Okamoto, M., Wada, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Kimura, A., Dan, H., Masuda, T., Dan, I., Influences of food-name labels on perceived tastes. Chemical Senses 34:3 (2009), 187–194.
21. Peracchio, L.A., Meyers-Levy, J., Using stylistic properties of ad pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 32:1 (2005), 29–40.
22. Pinson, C., An implicit product theory approach to consumers’ inferential judgments about products. International Journal of Research in Marketing 3 (1986), 19–38.
23. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory pattern of food. Food Quality and Preference 26:1 (2012), 67–73.
24. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 165–179.
25. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P., Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004), 364–382.
26. Salgado-Montejo, A., Alvarado, J., Velasco, C., Salgado, C.J., Hasse, K., Spence, C., The sweetest thing: The influence of angularity, symmetry, and number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2015, 1382.
27. Schifferstein, H.N., The drinking experience: Cup or content?. Food Quality and Preference 20:3 (2009), 268–276.
28. Schifferstein, H.N., Cleiren, M., Capturing product experiences: A split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica 118:3 (2005), 293–318.
29. Schifferstein, H.N.J., Spence, C., Multisensory product experience. Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P.P.M., (eds.) Product experience, 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 133–161.
30. Spence, C., Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22:1 (2012), 37–54.
31. Spence, C., Multisensory packaging design: Color, shape, pattern, sound, and smell. Burgess, P., (eds.) Integrating the packaging and product experience in food and beverages: A road-map to consumer satisfaction, 2016, Woodhead Publishing, USA, 1–22.
32. Spence, C., Gallace, A., Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality and Preference 22 (2011), 290–295.
33. Spence, C., Ngo, M.K., Percival, B., Smith, B., Crossmodal correspondences: Assessing shape symbolism for cheese. Food Quality and Preference 28:1 (2013), 206–212.
34. Spence, C., Wan, X., Beverage perception and consumption: The influence of the container on the perception of the contents. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 206–212.
35. Tu, Y., Yang, Z., Ma, C., Touching tastes: The haptic perception transfer of liquid food packaging materials. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 124–130.
36. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Hekkert, P., Saakes, D., Russo, B., Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. Acta Psychologica 119:3 (2005), 315–351.
37. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Ludden, G.D.S., Types of embodiment in design: The embodied foundations of meaning and affect in product design. International Journal of Design 9:1 (2015), 1–11.
38. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Pruyn, A.T.H., Tieke, P., Symbolic meaning integration in design and its influence on product and brand evaluation. International Journal of Design 3:2 (2009), 19–26.
39. Van Rompay, T.J.L., Pruyn, A.T.H., When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape-typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (2011), 599–610.
40. Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Spence, C., Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typographies, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference 34 (2014), 88–95.
41. Velasco, C., Woods, A.T., Petit, O., Cheok, A.D., Spence, C., Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review. Food Quality and Preference 52 (2016), 17–26.
42. Westerman, S.J., Gardner, P.H., Sutherland, E.J., White, T., Jordan, K., Watts, D., Wells, S., Product design: Preference for rounded versus angular design elements. Psychology & Marketing 29:8 (2012), 595–605.
43. Westerman, S.J., Sutherland, E.J., Gardner, P.H., Baig, N., Critchley, C., Hickey, C., Zervos, Z., The design of consumer packaging: Effects of manipulations of shape, orientation, and alignment of graphical forms on consumers’ assessments. Food Quality and Preference 27:1 (2013), 8–17.
44. Zhang, Y., Feick, L., Price, L.J., The impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:6 (2006), 794–805.