Beyond surprise: A longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products

International Journal of Design

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-10

  Ludden, Geke D S ^a   Schifferstein, Hendrik N J ^b   Hekkert, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design; Emotion; Incongruity; Multisensory; Surprise

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860908462     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2. Bijleveld, C. C. J. H., & van der Kamp, L. J. T. (1998). Longitudinal data analysis. London, UK: Sage.
3. Derbaix, C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise - A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 99-116.
4. Desmet, P. (2008). Product emotion. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 379-397). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
5. Hekkert, P. (1995). Artful judgements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
6. Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 259-285). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
7. Hekkert, P., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 483-495.
8. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation level theory. New York: Harper and Row.
9. Hopkins, J. R., Zelazo, P. R., Jacobson, S. W., & Kagan, J. (1976). Infant reactivity to stimulus - schema discrepancy. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 93(1), 27-62.
10. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
11. Lazarus, R. S., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Knowledge and appraisal in the cognition-emotion relationship. Cognition & Emotion, 2(4), 281-300.
12. Ludden, G. D. S., Hekkert, P., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2006). Surprise & emotion. In P. Desmet, M. Karlsson, and J. van Erp (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Design and Emotion Society. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
13. Ludden, G. D. S., Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert, P. (2008). Surprise as a design strategy. Design Issues, 24(2), 28-38.
14. Ludden, G. D. S., Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert, P. (2009). Visual-tactual incongruities in products as sources of surprise. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 61-87.
15. Meyer, W. U., Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schutzwohl, A. (1991). An experimental-analysis of surprise. Cognition & Emotion, 5(4), 295-311.
16. Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein, R., & Schutzwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251-274.
17. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
18. Painter, J. (2003). Designing multilevel models using SPSS 11.5 mixed model. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://www.unc.edu/~painter/SPSSMixed/SPSSMixedModels.PDF
19. Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127-146.
20. Roseman, I. J., & Evdokas, A. (2004). Appraisals cause experienced emotions: Experimental evidence. Cognition & Emotion, 18(1), 1-28.
21. Scherer, K. R. (1987). Toward a dynamic theory of emotions: The component process model of affective states. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1(1), 1-98.
22. Silvia, P. J. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5(1), 89-102.
23. Silvia, P. J. (2007). An introduction to multilevel modeling for research on the psychology of art and creativity. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(1), 1-20.
24. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813-838.
25. Stayman, D. M., Alden, D. L., & Smith, K. H. (1992). Some effects of schematic processing on consumer expectations and disconfirmation judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 240-255.
26. Vanhamme, J., & Snelders, D. (2001). The role of surprise in satisfaction judgements. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 14, 27-44.
27. Whitfield, T. W. A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-237.
28. Wyer, R. S., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4), 663-688.