Fermentation and enzymatic treatment of pea for turkey nutrition

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 237, Issue , 2018, Pages 78-88

  Goodarzi Boroojeni, F ^a   Kozlowski K ^b   Jankowski, J ^b   Senz, M ^c   Wisniewska M ^d   Boros, D ^d   Drazbo A ^b   Zentek, J ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

^c Institute of Biotechnology and Water   (Germany)

^d PLANT BREEDING AND ACCLIMATIZATION INSTITUTE NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Anti nutritional factors; Enzymatic pre digestion; Solid state fermentation; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041930901     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Methods: 32-25 (Dietary Fibre), 32–40.01 (Resistant Starch). 2003, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
2. Adeola, O., Cowieson, A., Board-invited review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 89 (2011), 3189–3218.
3. Bedford, M.R., Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition—their current value and future benefits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86 (2000), 1–13.
4. Chiang, G., Lu, W., Piao, X., Hu, J., Gong, L., Thacker, P., Effects of feeding solid-state fermented rapeseed meal on performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal ecology and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23 (2010), 263–271.
5. Denstadli, V., Westereng, B., Biniyam, H.G., Ballance, S., Knutsen, S.H., Svihus, B., Effects of structure and xylanase treatment of brewers’ spent grain on performance and nutrient availability in broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 51 (2010), 419–426.
6. Englyst, H.N., Cummings, J.H., Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109 (1984), 937–942.
7. Feng, J., Liu, X., Xu, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Effects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. Poult. Sci. 86 (2007), 1149–1154.
8. Frikha, M., Valencia, D., de Coca-Sinova, A., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G., Ileal digestibility of amino acids of unheated and autoclaved pea protein concentrate in broilers. Poult. Sci. 92 (2013), 1848–1857.
9. Gefrom, A., Ott, E., Hoedtke, S., Zeyner, A., Effect of ensiling moist field bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum) and lupine (Lupinus spp.) grains on the contents of alkaloids, oligosaccharides and tannins. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 97 (2013), 1152–1160.
10. Gericke, S., Kurmies, B., Die kolorimetrische Phosphorsäurebestimmung mit Ammonium-Vanadat-Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Dueng. Bodenkd. 59 (1952), 235–247.
11. Goodarzi Boroojeni, F., Svihus, B., von Reichenbach, H.G., Zentek, J., The effects of hydrothermal processing on feed hygiene, nutrient availability, intestinal microbiota and morphology in poultry—a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 220 (2016), 187–215.
12. Goodarzi Boroojeni, F., Senz, M., Kozłowski, K., Boros, D., Wisniewska, M., Rose, D., Männer, K., Zentek, J., The effects of fermentation and enzymatic treatment of pea on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers. Animal, 2017, 1–10.
13. Hess, J., Bilgili, S., Downs, K., Paw quality issues. Proc. Deep South Poultry Conference, Tifton, GA. University of Georgia, Athens, 2004.
14. Hocking, P., Mayne, R., Else, R., French, N., Gatcliffe, J., Standard European footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in turkey processing plants. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 64 (2008), 323–328.
15. Hybrid Turkeys, Commercial Management Guide. Converter Commercial Performance Goals. 2016 http://www.hybridturkeys.com.
16. Igbasan, F., Guenter, W., The evaluation and enhancement of the nutritive value of yellow-, green-and brown-seeded pea cultivars for unpelleted diets given to broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 63 (1996), 9–24.
17. Kakade, M., Rackis, J., McGhee, J., Puski, G., Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: a collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem. 51 (1974), 376–382.
18. Kozłowski, K., Helmbrecht, A., Lemme, A., Jankowski, J., Jeroch, H., Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids from high-protein feedstuffs for growing turkeys–a preliminary study. Arch. Geflłgelk 75 (2011), 185–190.
19. Laudadio, V., Nahashon, S., Tufarelli, V., Growth performance and carcass characteristics of guinea fowl broilers fed micronized-dehulled pea (Pisum sativum L.) as a substitute for soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 91 (2012), 2988–2996.
20. Lemme, A., Ravindran, V., Bryden, W., Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 60 (2004), 423–438.
21. Martland, M., Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys. Avian Pathol. 13 (1984), 241–252.
22. Mayne, R., A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 61 (2005), 256–267.
23. Nagaraj, M., Hess, J., Bilgili, S., Evaluation of a feed-grade enzyme in broiler diets to reduce pododermatitis. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16 (2007), 52–61.
24. Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C., Hess, J., Bilgili, S., Effect of high-protein and all-vegetable diets on the incidence and severity of pododermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16 (2007), 304–312.
25. Nalle, C., Ravindran, V., Ravindran, G., Nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum L.) for broilers: apparent metabolisable energy, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance. Anim. Prod. Sci. 51 (2011), 150–155.
26. Naumann, K., Bassler, R., Methodenbuch Band III: Die chemischeUntersuchung von Futtermitteln. 2004, Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen, Germany.
27. Ouoba, L.I.I., Cantor, M., Diawara, B., Traore, A., Jakobsen, M., Degradation of African locust bean oil by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus isolated from soumbala, a fermented African locust bean condiment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95 (2003), 868–873.
28. Ouoba, L., Diawara, B., Christensen, T., Mikkelsen, J.D., Jakobsen, M., Degradation of polysaccharides and non-digestible oligosaccharides by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus isolated from Soumbala, a fermented African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa) food condiment. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 224 (2007), 689–694.
29. Ravindran, V., Feed enzymes: the science, practice, and metabolic realities. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 22 (2013), 628–636.
30. Ruiz-Teran, F., Owens, D.J., Chemical and enzymic changes during the fermentation of bacteria-free soya bean tempe. J. Sci. Food Agric. 71 (1996), 523–530.
31. Schäfer, K., Analysis of short chain fatty acids from different intestinal samples by capillary gas chromatography. Chromatographia 40 (1995), 550–556.
32. Selle, P., Ravindran, V., Caldwell, A., Bryden, W., Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. Nutr. Res. Rev. 13 (2000), 255–278.
33. Shepherd, E., Fairchild, B., Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult. Sci. 89 (2010), 2043–2051.
34. Short, F., Gorton, P., Wiseman, J., Boorman, K., Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59 (1996), 215–221.
35. Svihus, B., Hetland, H., Choct, M., Sundby, F., Passage rate through the anterior digestive tract of broiler chickens fed on diets with ground and whole wheat. Br. Poult. Sci. 43 (2002), 662–668.
36. Svihus, B., Newman, R.K., Newman, C.W., Effect of soaking, germination, and enzyme treatment of whole barley on nutritional value and digestive tract parameters of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 38 (1997), 390–396.
37. VDLUFA, Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-und Untersuchungsmethodik, Methodenbuch Band VI-Chemische, physikalische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungsverfahren für Milch Milchprodukte und Molkereihilfsstoffe. 2003, VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.