Learning three-dimensional anatomical structures with animation: Effect of orientation references and learners' spatial ability

Learning from Dynamic Visualization: Innovations in Research and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 279-303

  Berney, Sandra ^a   Bétrancourt, Mireille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033581289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: "Body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327-347.
2. Bialystok, E. (1989). Children's mental rotations of abstract displays. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 47-71.
3. Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 551-557.
4. Carpenter, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes. Memory & Cognition, 29, 441-448.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2004). Evaluating spatial memory in two and three dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 359-373. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.01.005.
7. Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 701-711.
8. Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95(1), 115-123.
9. De Koning, B. B., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). Attention guidance strategies for supporting learning from dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
10. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factorreferenced cognitive tests (Vol. 102, p. 117). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., Eva, K. W., Spero, L., & Sharan, S. (2002). Is there any real virtue of virtual reality?: The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 77(10 Suppl), 97-99.
12. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., Spero, L., & Taylor, I. (1999). Learning anatomy: Do new computer models improve spatial understanding? Medical Teacher, 21, 519-522.
13. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet, 357(9253), 363-364.
14. Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P., & Collet, C. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 12, 491-507.
15. Hays, T. A. (1996). Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 139-155.
16. Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations betweens internal and external visualizations. In A. F. Blackwell, K. Mariott, & A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2980 (pp. 1-13). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
17. Hegarty, M. (2005). Multimedia learning about physical systems. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (1st ed., pp. 447-465). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 52(10), 265-297. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(10)52007-3.
19. Hegarty, M., Canham, M. S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2010). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 37-53.
20. Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Cohen, C. A., Montello, D. R., & Lippa, Y. (2007). The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition (pp. 285-315). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Hegarty, M., Kozhevnikov, M., & Waller, D. (2004). Perspective taking/spatial orientation test. Intelligence, 32, 175-191.
22. Hegarty, M., & Kriz, S. (2008). Effect of knowledge and spatial ability on learning from animation. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (1st ed., pp. 3-29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 411-430.
24. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175-191.
25. Hinton, G. E., & Parsons, L. M. (1988). Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30, 1-35.
26. Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations-A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 245-269.
27. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations - Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209-216. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042.
28. Hoyek, N., Collet, C., Rastello, O., Fargier, P., Thiriet, P., & Guillot, A. (2009). Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 21, 201-206.
29. Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 392-404.
30. Ionta, S., Fourkas, A. D., Fiorio, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007). The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 1-7.
31. Jenkinson, J. (2017). The role of craft-based knowledge in the design of dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe, & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
32. Kapandji, A. I. (2009). Anatomie fonctionnelle (Maloine, Ed.; 6th ed.). Paris.
33. Keehner, M., & Khooshabeh, P. (2002). Computerized representations of 3D structure: How spatial comprehension and patterns of interactivity differ among learners. In Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium series, reasoning with mental and external diagrams (pp. 12-17). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
34. Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114, 72-88.
35. Kessler, K., & Wang, H. (2012). Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: Differences predicted by sex and social skills score. Spatial Cognition Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 133-158.
36. Khacharem, A., Zoudji, B., Kalyuga, S., & Ripoll, H. (2013). Developing tactical skills through the use of static and dynamic soccer visualizations: An expert-nonexpert differences investigation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 326-340.
37. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Inferring cross-sections: When internal visualizations are more important than properties of external visualizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 119-147.
38. Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and inteconnections. In C. Freska, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1404, pp. 1-17). Berlin: Springer.
39. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Kosslyn, S. M., Brunn, J., Cave, K. R., & Wallach, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195-243.
41. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745-756.
42. Kozhevnikov, M., Royan, J., Blazhenkova, O., & Gorbunov, A. (2008). The role of immersivity in three-dimensional mental rotation. In J. S. Gero & A. K. Goel (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on design computing and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 143-157). Dordrecht: SAGE Publications.
43. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux' s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. F. Garrett, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Linn, M. C., & Peterson, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 5, 1479-1498.
45. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
46. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2004). Reasons for using animation. Unpublished Article.
47. Luursema, J.-M., & Verwey, W. B. (2011). The contribution of dynamic exploration to virtual anatomical learning. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2011, 1-6.
48. Marks, S. C. (2000). The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 13, 448-452.
49. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 200, 269-294.
50. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89, 55-71.
51. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
52. Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 327-337.
53. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621-640.
54. Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162-170.
55. Nguyen, N., Nelson, A. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2012). Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5, 98-108.
56. Pani, J. R. (1993). Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: Mental imagery of rotations with oblique components. Perception, 22, 785-808.
57. Pani, J. R., William, C. T., & Shippey, G. T. (1995). Determinants of the perception of rotational motion: Orientation of the motion to the object and to the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1441-1456.
58. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
59. Parsons, L. M. (1995). Inability to reason about an object's orientation using an axis and angle of rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1259-1277.
60. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 29, 39-58.
61. Petit, L., Pegna, A. J., Mayer, E., & Hauert, C.-A. (2003). Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: Mental rotation of a body segment. Brain and Cognition, 51, 95-101.
62. Rochford, K. (1985). Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education, 19, 13-26.
63. Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2017). Dynamic visuospatial ability and learning from dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe, & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization - Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
64. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Research implications for design (pp. 304-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2017). Learning from animations: From 2d to 3d? In R. Lowe, & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
66. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310.
67. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on intrnal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
68. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
69. Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3-11.
70. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
71. Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17, 219-234.
72. Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Getting a handle on learning anatomy with interactive three-dimensional graphics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 803-816.
73. Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Anatomy learning with virtual objects. In Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium: Cognitive shape processing (pp. 39-44). Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
74. Tamborello, F. P., Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2012). Spatial reasoning with multiple intrinsic frames of reference. Experimental Psychology, 59, 3-10.
75. Thiriet, P. (1982). La formation scientifique des professeurs africans d'éducation physique: Contribution à une didactique de l'anatomie et de la physiologie [Scientific formation of African physical education professors: Contribution to anatomy and physiology didactics] (Doctoral dissertation). Université Lyon II, Lyon.
76. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
77. Waller, D. (2013). Human perception & cognition of space I. Lecture conducted at the International Spatial Cognition Summer Institute, ISCSI 2013, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA.
78. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215-250.
79. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151-168.
80. Yang, E., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 329-350.
81. Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 96-118.
82. Zacks, J. M., Mires, J. O. N., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2000). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 315-332.
83. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 271-306.
84. Ziemek, T. R. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of orientation indicators with an awareness of individual differences (Doctoral dissertation). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.