The role of craft-based knowledge in the design of dynamic visualizations

Learning from Dynamic Visualization: Innovations in Research and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 93-117

  Jenkinson, Jodie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033551129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Ainsworth, S. (2008). How do animations influence learning? In D. H. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 37-67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
2. Betrancourt, M., & Chassot, A. (2008). Making sense of animation. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animations: Research implications for design (pp. 141-164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Block, B. (2008). The visual story: Creating the visual structure of film, tv and digital media (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Focal Press/Elsevier.
4. Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 71-84.
5. Crosby, R. W., & Cody, J. (1991). Max Brödel, the man who put art into medicine. New York: Springer.
6. De Koning, B. B., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). Attention guidance strategies for supporting learning from dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization- Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
7. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113-140.
8. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 41-45.
9. Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1126-1141.
10. Fischer, S., & Schwan, S. (2010). Comprehending animations: Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling. Learning and Instruction., 20, 465-475.
11. Goodsell, D. S. (2010). The machinery of life (2nd ed.). New York: Copernicus Books Springer.
12. Goodsell, D. S., & Johnson, G. T. (2007). Filling in the gaps: Artistic license in education and outreach. PLoS Biology, 5(12), e308.
13. Hodges, E. (Ed.). (2003). The guild handbook of scientific illustration (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14. Iwasa, J. H. (2010). Animating the model figure. Trends in Cell Biology, 20, 699-704.
15. Jantzen, S. G., Jenkinson, J., & McGill, G. (2015). Transparency in film: Increasing credibility of scientific animation using citation. Nature Methods, 12, 293-297.
16. Jastrzebski, Z. (1985). Scientific illustration: A guide for the beginning artist. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
17. Jenkinson, J., & McGill, G. (2012). Visualizing protein interactions and dynamics: Evolving a visual language for molecular animation. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 103-110.
18. Johnson, G. T., & Hertig, S. (2014). A guide to the visual analysis and communication of biomolecular structural data. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15, 690-698.
19. Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177-189.
20. Linn, M. C., Chang, H. Y., Chiu, J. L., Zhang, H. Z., & McElhaney, K. (2010). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 239-262). New York: Routledge.
21. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
22. Lowe, R., Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2011). Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 452-459.
23. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics. New York: Kitchen Sink Press/Harper Collins.
25. McGill, G. (2008). Molecular movies Coming to a lecture near you. Cell, 133, 1127-1132.
26. McGill, G. (2017). Designing instructional science visualizations in the trenches: Where research meets production reality. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization- Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
27. Rieber, L. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431-444.
28. Rieber, L., & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction. Computers in Schools, 5(1/2), 77-89.
29. Sanger, M., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 521-537.
30. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animations: Research implications for design (pp. 49-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2017). Learning from animations: From 2d to 3d? In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
32. Sharpe, J., Lumsden, C., & Woolridge, N. (2008). In silico: 3D animation and simulation of cell biology with Maya and MEL. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.
33. Thomas, F., & Johnston, O. (1981). The illusion of life: Disney animation. New York: Hyperion.
34. Tufte, E. (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press Inc.
35. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., MacKenzie, R., Lozano, S., & Morrison, J. B. (2008). Enriching animations. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animations: Research implications for design (pp. 263-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
37. Wagner, I., & Schnotz, W. (2017). Learning from static and dynamic visualizations: What kind of questions should we ask? In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization- Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
38. Ware, C. (2004). Information visualization: Perception for design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
39. Wilson-Pauwels, L. (1997). Bringing it into focus: Visual cues and their role in directing attention. Journal of Biocommunication, 24(3), 12-16.
40. Wood, P. (1994). Scientific illustration (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
41. Woolridge, N. (2012). To cut, or not to cut. Journal of Biocommunication, 38(1), 27-30.
42. Woolridge, N. (2013). Drawing a line in the mind: Some reflections on the fundamental nature of linear depiction. Journal of Biocommunication, 39(1), 26-31.