Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2980, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-13

  Hegarty, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICINE; PERSONNEL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION; WORLD WIDE WEB; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; EXTERNAL VISUALIZATION; INTERNAL VISUALIZATION; SCIENCE EDUCATION; COMPUTER VISUALIZATION; EDUCATION AND TRAINING; VISUALIZATION SKILLS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 9444248166     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. & Schneiderman, B. (2001) Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Bogacz, S. & Trafton, J. G. (2002). Understanding static and dynamic visualizations. In Hegarty, M., Meyer, B. & Narayanan, N. H. (Eds.) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Proceedings of the second international conference on Diagrams, Berlin: Springer.
4. Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75-100.
5. Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1993) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
7. Cheng, P. C-H. (2002). Electrifying diagrams for learning: principles for effective representational systems. Cognitive Science, 26, 685-736.
8. th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of Factor Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Ferguson, E. S. (1977). The mind's eye. Non-verbal thought in technology. Science, 197, 827-836.
11. Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of Mental Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., Spero, L. & Maheshwari, P. (1999). Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning. Academic Medicine, 74, 87-89.
13. Gordin, D. N. & Pea, R. D. (1995) Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 249-279.
14. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(5) 1084-1102.
15. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S. & Cate, C. (in press). The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems. Cognition & Instruction.
16. Hegarty, M. & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 411-430.
17. Hegarty, M. & Steinhoff, K. (1997). Use of diagrams as external memory in a mechanical reasoning task. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 19-42.
18. Hegarty, M. & Waller, D. (in press). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.). Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge University Press.
19. Isaak, M. I. & Just, M. A. (1995). Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: The curtate cycloid illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1391-1408.
20. Koedinger, K. R. & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511-550.
21. Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). Elements of graph design. New York: W.H. Freeman.
22. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10,000 words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
24. Logic, R. H. (1995) Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Lowe, R. K. (1999) Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
26. Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
27. Miller, A. I. (1986) Imagery in scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Narayanan, N. H., Suwa, M. & Motoda, H. (1994). A study of diagrammatic reasoning from verbal and gestural data. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 652-657.
29. Nerssesian, N. J. (1995) Should physicists preach what they practice? Science & Education, 4, 203-226.
30. Nielson, G. M., Shriver, B. & Rosenblum, J. (Eds.) (1990). Visualization in scientific computing. Los Alamitos, CA.
31. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart : defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley
32. Olson & Bialystock (1983). Spatial Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
33. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.) Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 73-126.
34. Runeson, S. (1974) Constant velocity: Not perceived as such. Psychological Research, 37, 3-23.
35. Trafton, J. G., Tricket, S. B. & Mintz, R. E. (in press). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science.
36. th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B. & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
38. Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
39. Schwarte, D. L. & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497.
40. Schwartz, D. L. & Hegarty, M. (1996). Coordinating multiple representations for reasoning about mechanical devices. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Cognitive and Computational Models of Spatial Representation. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
41. Shah, P. & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 43-61.
42. Shah, P., Mayer, R. E. & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690-702.
43. Shepard, R. N. (1978). Extemalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Randawa & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual Learning, Thinking and Communication. Academic Press, San Diego.
44. Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. (1971), Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
45. Sims, V. K. & Hegarty, M. (1997). Mental animation in the visual-spatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory & Cognition, 25, 321-332.
46. Spence, R. (2001). Information Visualization, Essex: ACM Press.
47. Zhang, J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 45, 59-74.
48. Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.