Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2002, Issue 89, 2002, Pages 55-71

  Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898289832     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.47     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baddeley, A. D. Working Memory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
2. Baddeley, A. D. Human Memory. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
3. Baggett, P. “Role of Temporal Overlap of Visual and Auditory Material in Forming Dual Media Associations.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, 76, 408-417.
4. Baggett, P. “Understanding Visual and Verbal Messages.” In H. Mandl, and J. R. Levin(eds.), Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.
5. Baggett, P and Ehrenfeucht, A. “Encoding and Retaining Information in the Visuals and Verbals of an Educational Movie.” Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 1983, 31, 23-32.
6. Dewey, J. Interest and Effort in Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1913.
7. Harp, S. F and Mayer, R. E. “The Role of Interest in Learning from Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, 89, 92-102.
8. Harp, S. F and Mayer, R. E. “How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998, 90, 414-434.
9. Kalyuga, S Chandler, P and Sweller, J. “Managing Split-Attention and Redundancy in Multimedia Instruction.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1999, 13, 351-372.
10. Kozma, R. B. “Learning with Media.” Review of Educational Research, 1991, 61, 179-211.
11. Loman, N. L and Mayer, R. E. “Signaling Techniques That Increase the Understandability of Expository Prose.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983, 75, 402-412.
12. Lorch, R. F. “Text Signaling Devices and Their Effects on Reading and Memory Processes.” Educational Psychology Review, 1989, 1, 209-234.
13. Mautone, P. D and Mayer, R. E. “Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 93, 377-389.
14. Mayer, R. E. The Promise of Educational Psychology. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1999.
15. Mayer, R. E. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
16. Mayer, R. E. “Changing Conceptions of Learning: A Century of Progress in the Scientific Study of Education.” In L. Corno(ed.), Education Across a Century: Hundredth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, forthcoming.
17. Mayer, R. E and Anderson, R. B. “Animations Need Narrations: An Experimental Test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991, 83, 484-490.
18. Mayer, R. E and Anderson, R. B. “The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections Between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84, 444-452.
19. Mayer, R. E and Chandler, P. “When Learning Is Just a Click Away: Does Simple User Interaction Foster Deeper Understanding of Multimedia Messages?” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 93, 390-397.
20. Mayer, R. E Heiser, J and Lonn, S. “Cognitive Constraints on Multimedia Learning: When Presenting More Material Results in Less Understanding.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 93, 187-198.
21. Mayer, R. E and Moreno, R. “A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998, 90, 312-320.
22. Mayer, R. E Moreno, R Boire, M and Vagge, S. “Maximizing Constructivist Learning from Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91, 638-643.
23. Mayer, R. E and Sims, V. K. “For Whom Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual-Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994, 86, 389-401.
24. Moreno, R and Mayer, R. E. “Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91, 358-368.
25. Moreno, R and Mayer, R. E. “A Coherence Effect in Multimedia Learning: The Case for Minimizing Irrelevant Sounds in the Design of Multimedia Instructional Messages.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 92, 117-125.
26. Moreno, R. E and Mayer, R. E. “Engaging Students in Active Learning: The Case for Personalized Multimedia Messages.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 92, 724-733.
27. Mousavi, S Low, R and Sweller, J. “Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 87, 319-334.
28. Pailliotet, A. W and Mosenthal, P. B.(eds.). Reconceptualizing Literacy in the Media Age. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 2000.
29. Paivio, A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
30. Reeves, B and Nass, C. The Media Equation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
31. Renninger, K. A Hidi, S and Krapp, A.(eds.). The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1992.
32. Rieber, L. P. “Animation in Computer-Based Instruction.” Educational Technology Research and Development, 1990, 38, 77-86.
33. Sweller, J. Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press, 1999.
34. Williams, M. D. “Learner Control and Instructional Technologies.” In D. H. Jonassen(ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communication and Technology. Old Tappan, N.J.: Macmillan, 1996.
35. Wittrock, M. C. “Generative Processes of Comprehension.” Educational Psychologist, 1989, 24, 345-376.