Evaluating spatial memory in two and three dimensions

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 359-373

  Cockburn, A ^a   McKenzie, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MONITORS; DATA REDUCTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; RESEARCH; WEBSITES;

COMPUTER DISPLAYS; PHYSICAL MODELS; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL MEMORY;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 3242734849     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Attneave F. Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. American Journal of Psychology. 68:1955;209-222.
2. Barfield W., Rosenberg C. Judgements of azimuth and elevation as a function of monoscopic and binocular depth cues using a perspective display. Human Factors. 37(1):1995;173-181.
3. Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., 2001. 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. Proceedings of CHI'2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, March 31-April 6, pp. 434-441.
4. Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., 2002. Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments. Proceedings of CHI'2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN, 20-25 April, pp. 203-210.
5. Czerwinski, M., vanDantzich, M., Robertson, G., Hoffman, H., 1999. The contribution of thumbnail image, mouse-over text and spatial location memory to web page retrieval in 3D. Proceedings of Interact '99, Edinburgh, Scotland, IOS press, pp. 163-170.
6. Delucia P. Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgements about potential collisions in perspective displays. Human Factors. 37(3):1995;528-538.
7. Egan, D., Gomez, M., 1985. Assaying, isolating, and accomodating individual differences in learning a complex skill. Individual Differences in Cognition. R. Dillon, Academic Press, New York, pp. 173-217.
8. Ehret, B., 2002. Learning where to look: location learning in graphical user interfaces. Proceedings of CHI'2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN, 20-25 April, pp. 211-218.
9. Gagnon D. Videogames and spatial skills. an exploratory study Educational Communication and Technology. 33(4):1985;263-275.
10. Goldstein E. Sensation and Perception. 1989;Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
11. Hicks M., O'Malley C., Nichols S., Anderson B. Comparison of 2D and 3D representations for visualising telecommunication usage. Behavior and Information Technology. 22(3):2003;185-201.
12. Jones W., Dumais S. The spatial metaphor for user interfaces. experimental tests of reference by location versus name ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems. 4(1):1986;42-63.
13. Leitheiser, B., Munro, D., 1995. An experimental study of the relationship between spatial ability and the learning of a graphical user interface. Proceedings of the Inaugural Americas Conference on Information Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, August 25-27.
14. Paivio A., Rogers T., Smythe P. Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science. 11:1968;137-138.
15. Paivio, A., Yuille, J., Madigan, S., 1968b. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 76(3).
16. Risden K., Czerwinski M., Munzner T., Cook D. An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 53:2000;695-714.
17. Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D., Thiel, D., vanDantzich, M., 1998. Data Mountain: using spatial memory for document management. Proceedings of UIST'98 ACM Conference on User Interface Software and Technology, November 1-4., San Francisco, CA, pp. 153-162.
18. Robertson, G., vanDantzich, M., Czerwinski, M., Hinckley, K., Thiel, D., Robbins, D., Risden, K., Gorokhovsky, V., 2000. The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager. Proceedings of CHI'2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. The Hague, The Netherlands, April 1-6, pp. 494-501.
19. Smallman H., St John M., Oonk H., Cowen M. Track Recognition Using Two-Dimensional Symbols or Three-Dimensional Realistic Icons. 2000;SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego.
20. StJohn M., Oonk H., Cowen M. Using Two-Dimensional and Perspective Views of Terrain. 2000;SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego.
21. Tavanti, M., Lind, M., 2001. 2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory. Proceedings of IEEE InfoVis 2001 Symposium on Information Visualization, San Diego, 22-23 October, pp. 139-145.
22. Vicente K., Hayes B., Williges R. Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Human Factors. 29(3):1987;349-359.
23. Ware C. Information Visualization. Perception for Design:2000;Morgan Kaufmann, Los Alcos, CA.
24. Ware C., Franck G. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 15(2):1996;121-139.
25. Wickens, C., Miller, S., Tham, M., 1994. The implications of data-link for representing pilot request information on 2D and 3D air traffic control displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, Nashville, pp. 61-65.
26. Wickens, C., Liang, C., Prevett, T., Olmos, O., 1995. Egocentric and exocentric displays for terminal area navigation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, pp. 16-20.
27. Wickens, C., Olmos, O., Chudy, A., Davenport, C., 1997. Aviation Display Support For Situation Awareness. (ARL-97-10/LOGICON-97-2).