Spatial reasoning with multiple intrinsic frames of reference

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-10

  Tamborello II, Franklin P ^a   Sun, Yanlong ^a   Wang, Hongbin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Intrinsic frame of reference; Spatial reasoning; Spatial representation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84863121199     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000119     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Grabowski, J. (1999). A uniform anthropomorphological approach to the human conception of dimensional relations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 349-363.
2. Grabowski, J., & Miller, G. A. (2000). Factors affecting the use of dimensional prepositions in German and American English: Object orientation, social context, and prepositional pattern. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 517-553.
3. Gunzelmann, G., Anderson, J. R., & Douglass, S. (2004). Orientation tasks with multiple views of space: Strategies and performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4, 207-253.
4. Hunt, E., & Waller, D. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: A review. Technical Report to ONR.
5. Keehner, M., Lippa, Y., Montello, D. R., Tendick, F., & Hegarty, M. (2006). Learning a spatial skill for surgery: How the contributions of abilities change with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 487-503.
6. Kessler, K., & Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-12.
7. Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114, 72-88.
8. Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections. Spatial cognition - an interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1404),, 1-17.
9. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Gitelman, D. R., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology, 26, 333-347. (Pubitemid 29068428)
10. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., Rasch, B., & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397-417. (Pubitemid 43676206)
11. Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garret (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Li, X., Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2009). Intrinsic orientation and study viewpoint in recognizing spatial structure of a shape. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 518-523.
14. May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 169-186.
15. Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception&Psychophysics, 68, 327-337. (Pubitemid 44874409)
16. Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 162-170.
17. Mou, W., Zhang, H., & McNamara, T. P. (2009). Novel-View scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions. Cognition, 111, 175-186.
18. Parsons, L. M. (2003). Superior parietal cortices and varieties of mental rotation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 515-517. (Pubitemid 37476243)
19. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310. (Pubitemid 33646292)
20. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects. Science, 171, 701.
21. Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Perception of space by multiple intrinsic frames of reference. PLoS ONE, 5, e10442.
22. Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124-129.
23. van der Loo, M. (December 3, 2009). Extreme Values: Univariate outlier detection. Retrieved from http://cran.at.r-project.org/web/packages/ extremevalues/index.html
24. Wang, H., Johnson, T. R., & Zhang, J. (2001). The mind's views of space. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Cognitive Science.
25. Wang, H., Sun, Y., Johnson, T. R., & Yuan, Y. (2005). Prioritized spatial updating in the intrinsic frame of reference. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 89-113.
26. Wang, R. F. W., & Spelke, E. S. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 376-382.
27. Wohlschlager, A., & Wohlschlager, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 98, 397-412. (Pubitemid 128455620)
28. Wraga, M., Shephard, J. M., Church, J. A., Inati, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Imagined rotations of self versus objects: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1351-1361. (Pubitemid 40798365)
29. Wraga, M., Thompson, W. L., Alpert, N. M., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Implicit transfer of motor strategies in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 52, 135-143. (Pubitemid 36773646)
30. Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 96-118. (Pubitemid 41537208)
31. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 271-306.