Privacy in classroom assessment

Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 267-283

  Tierney, Robin D ^a   Koch, Martha J ^b  

^a Ottawa Catholic District School Board   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032789757     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315749136-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Allen, A. L. (2011). Unpopular privacy: What must we hide? New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Allen, A. L. (2013). Privacy isn’t everything: Accountability as a personal and social good. In A. D. Moore (Ed.), Information ethics: Privacy, property, and power (pp. 399-416). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
3. American Educational Research Association. (2000). Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: AERA.
4. Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York: Routledge.
5. Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
6. Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2006). Children and their digital dossiers: Lessons in privacy rights in the digital age. International Journal of Social Education, 21(1), 135-147.
7. Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., & Shilton, H. (2011). Nested contexts that shape assessment for learning: Schoolbased professional learning community and classroom culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 35-48.
8. Black, P. (2013). Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 167-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science student’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43-49.
10. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
12. Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Borgonovi, F., & Montt, G. (2012). Parental involvement in selected PISA countries and economies (OECD Education Working Paper No. 73). (Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP%282012%2910&docLanguage=En
14. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students’ formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 153-169.
15. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40-45.
16. Bygrave, L. A. (2010). Privacy and data protection in an international perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56, 165-200.
17. Bygrave, L. A. (2013, September). Privacy as a cultural value. Paper presented at the 35th International Conference on Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Warsaw, Poland.
18. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2014). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
19. Cavoukian, A. (2011). A guide to Ontario legislation covering the release of students’ personal information. Information and Privacy Commissioner, Toronto, ON, Canada.
20. Cavoukian, A. (2012). Privacy by Design [Leading Edge]. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 31(4), 18-19.
21. Collins, B. (2013). Empowerment of children through circle time: Myth or reality? Irish Educational Studies, 32(4), 421-436.
22. Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2014). Ratification of the convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/CRCIndex.aspx
23. Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 199-214.
24. Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.
25. Crook, K., & Truscott, D. (2007). Ethics and law for teachers. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Canada.
26. Dalziel, K. (2009). Privacy in schools: A guide to the Privacy Act for principals, teachers and boards of trustees. Wellington, NZ: Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
27. Davis, A. (2001). Do children have privacy rights in the classroom? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(3), 245-254.
28. Davis, M. R. (2009). Gradebooks take virtual approach: But online record-keeping poses data-security risks. Education Week, 30-31.
29. DeCew, J. (2013). Privacy. In E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman, C. Allen, & R. L. Anderson (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
30. Dixon, H., & Williams, R. (2003). Teachers’ understanding and use of formative assessment in literacy learning. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 1-12.
31. Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Ecclestone, K. (2010). Transforming formative assessment in lifelong learning. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill.
33. Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 128-143). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
34. Finn, R. L., Wright, D., & Friedewald, M. (2013). Seven types of privacy. In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, P. de Hert, & Y. Poullet (Eds.), European data protection: Coming of age (pp. 3-32). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
35. Foley, S. (2013). Student views of peer assessment at the International School of Lausanne. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(3), 201-213.
36. Freeman, M. (2000). The future of children’s rights. Children & Society, 14(4), 277-293.
37. General Teaching Council for Scotland. (2012). Code of professionalism and conduct. Retrieved from http://www.gtcs.org.uk/standards/copac.aspx
38. Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. (2013). To assess, to teach, to learn: A vision for the future of assessment. Princeton, NJ: ETS/Gordon Commission.
39. Government of Ontario. (1996). Ontario college of teachers act. Professional misconduct-Ontario regulation 437/97. Retrieved from http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_970437_e.htm Graham-Clay, S. (2005). Communicating with parents: Strategies for teachers. The School Community Journal, 16(1), 117-129.
40. Hachiya, R. F., Shoop, R. J., & Dunklee, D. R. (2014). The principal’s quick reference guide to school law: Reducing liability, litigation, and other potential legal tangles (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41. Hanafin, J., O’Donoghue, T., Flynn, M., & Shevlin, M. (2009). The primary school’s invasion of the privacy of the child: Unmasking the potential of some current practices. Educational Studies, 36(2), 143-152.
42. Hargreaves, A., & Braun, H. (2013). Data-driven improvement and accountability. Retrieved from National Education Policy Centre website http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Hargreaves_DDIA_Policy.pdf
43. Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 103-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 36, 101-111.
45. Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T., & Harnett, J. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 26(2), 107-133.
46. Harvard Family Research Project. (2013). Tips for administrators, teachers, and families: How to share data effectively. Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/tips-foradministrators-teachers-and-families-how-to-share-data-effectively
47. Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning for teachers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
48. Herold, B., & Davis, M. R. (2014). Personal danger of data breaches prompts action. Education Week, 33(18), 1-11.
49. Hinchey, P. A. (2001). Student rights: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
50. Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89-112.
51. Hui, T. K. (2014). Pearson data system hits a bumpy ride in North Carolina: Technical problems frustrating schools. Education Week, 33(23), 8.
52. Imber, M., & van Geel, T. (2010). Education law. New York: Routledge.
53. Johnston, P. (2003). Assessment conversations. Reading Teacher, 57(1), 90.
54. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The student evaluation standards: How to improve evaluations of students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
55. Kharif, O. (2014). Privacy fears over student data tracking lead to InBloom’s shutdown. Technology. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-05-01/inbloom-shuts-down-amid-privacyfears-over-student-data-tracking
56. Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, . . . Yu, S. (2014). E-learning in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills: Critical research issues and policy implications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 70-78.
57. McCrea, B. (2013). 7 free Apps for keeping parents and teachers connected. The Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology. http://thejournal.com/articles/2013/06/11/7-free-apps-for-keeping-parents-andteachers-connected.aspx
58. Moore, A. D. (2013). Privacy. In H. LaFollette, J. Deigh, & S. Stroud (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Online ed.): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
59. Moore, B. (1998). Privacy. Society, 35(2), 287-299.
60. Morgan, C., & Watson, A. (2002). The interpretive nature of teachers’ assessment of students’ mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 78-110.
61. Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
62. Moss, P. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13-25.
63. Ontario College of Teachers. (2012). Foundations of professional practice. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.oct.ca/~/media/PDF/Foundations%20of%20Professional%20Practice/Foundation_e.ashx
64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2012). The protection of children online: Recommendations of the OECD Council. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
65. Paré, M. (2012). Inclusion of students with disabilities in the age of technology: The need for human rights guidance. Education & Law Journal, 22(1), 39-61.
66. Parry, G. (2002). Privacy rights in the classroom: Peer grading Supreme Court judgment. Education & the Law, 14(3), 173-180.
67. Payton, T. M., & Claypoole, T. (2014). Privacy in the age of big data: Recognizing threats, defending your rights, and protecting your family. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
68. Periñán, B. (2012). The origin of privacy as a legal value: A reflection on Roman and English law. American Journal of Legal History, 52, 183-201.
69. Pryor, J., & Lubisi, C. (2002). Reconceptualising educational assessment in South Africa: Testing times for teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(6), 673-686.
70. Pryor, J., & Torrance, J. (1998). Formative assessment in the classroom: Where psychological theory meets social practice. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 151-176.
71. Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (2013). Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 178-193.
72. Reidenberg, J., Russell, N. C., Kovnot, J., Norton, T. B., Cloutier, R., & Alvarado, D. (2013). Privacy and cloud computing in public schools. Fordham Law School, Center on Law and Information Policy. Retrieved from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/clip/2
73. Richards, J., & Stebbins, L. (2014). Behind the data: Testing and assessment, a Pre K-12 US education technology market report. Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry Association.
74. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15-24.
75. Russo, C. J., & Osborne, A. G. (2014). Student records and privacy. School Business Affairs, 80(4), 35-38.
76. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
77. Schwartz, P. M., & Solove, D. J. (2014). Reconciling personal information in the United States and European Union. California Law Review, 102, 877-916.
78. Schweikert, G. (2014). Using technology to communicate with parents: Tool or taboo? Exchange Magazine, May/June, 62-64.
79. Shariff, S., & Johnny, L. (2008). Child rights in cyber-space: Protection, participation, and privacy. In T. O’Neill & D. Zinga (Eds.), Children’s rights: Multidisciplinary approaches to participation and protection (pp. 220-244). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
80. Shepard, L. (2006). Classroom assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 623-646). Westport, CT: National Council on Measurement in Education, American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
81. Solove, D. J. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477.
82. Solove, D. J. (2011). Why privacy matters even if you have ʼnothing to hide’. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(37), B11-B13.
83. Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 11-18.
84. Tierney, R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Tierney, R. D. (2014). Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 55-69.
86. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-404.
87. Ujifusa, A. (2014). State lawmakers ramp up attention on student-data privacy. Education Week, 33(28), 19-30.
88. United Nations. (1948). United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.universal.declaration.of.human.rights.1948/portrait.letter.pdf
89. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
90. professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx United Nations. (2014). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Human Rights Law. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/hr_law.shtml
91. United States Department of Education. (2002). Policy Guidance-Access to High School Students and Information on Students by Military Recruiters. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/hot topics/ht-10-09-02a.html
92. United States Department of Education. (2014). Protecting student privacy while using online educational services: Requirements and best practices. Retrieved from http://ptac.ed.gov/
93. Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 145-156.
94. Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. (1890/2005). The right to privacy. In A. D. Moore (Ed.), Information ethics: Privacy, property, and power. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
95. Waters, J. K. (2010). Move it or lose it: Cloud-based data storage. The Journal. Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/Articles/2010/09/01/Move-It-or-Lose-It-Cloud-Based-Data-Storage.aspx
96. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
97. Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431-453.
98. Wiliam, D. (2015). Assessment: A powerful focus for the improvement of mathematics instruction. In C. Suurtamm (Ed.), Assessment to enhance teaching and learning (pp. 247-254). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
99. Willis, J., & Adie, L. (2014). Teachers using annotations to engage students in assessment conversations: Recontextualising knowledge. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 495-515.
100. Zgonjanin, S. (2006). No child left (behind) unrecruited. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 5(5), 167-196.