Child rights in cyber-space: Protection, participation, and privacy

Children's Rights: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Participation and Protection

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 219-244

  Shariff, Shaheen ^a   Johnny, Leanne ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967332997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Adam, A. (2001). Cyberstalking: Gender and computer ethics. In E. Green & A. Adam (Eds.), Virtual gender: Technology, consumption and identity (pp. 209-224). New York: Routledge.
2. Almog, S., & Bendor, A. (2004). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child meets the American Constitution: Towards a supreme law of the world. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11, 273-289.
3. Artz, S., Riecken, E., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E., & Maczewski, M. (2000). Theorizing gender differences in receptivity to violence prevention programming in schools. Journal of the B.C. School Counsellors Association, 22(1), 7-35.
4. Baker v. Canada, 2 S.C.R. 817 (1999).
5. Barak, A. (2005). Sexual harassment on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 77-92.
6. Boulton, M.J. (1993). A comparison of adults’ and children’s abilities to distinguish between aggressive and playful fighting in middle school pupils. Implications for playground supervision and behaviour management. Educational Studies, 19, 193-203.
7. Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
8. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Schedule B, Constitution Act, 1982, Canada Act, c. 11 (U.K.).
9. Cassidy, W. (2000). Law-related education. Promoting awareness, participation and action. In T. Goldstein and D. Selby (Eds.), Weaving connections: Educating for peace, social and environmental justice (pp. 297-322). Toronto: Sumach Press.
10. Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, 4 S.C.R. 710 (2002).
11. Chu, J. (2005, August 8). You wanna take this online? Cyberspace is the 21st century bully’s playground where girls play rougher than boys. Time (Canadian ed.), 42-43.
12. Cohen, C. (2002). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Developing international norms to create a new world for children. In K. Alaimo & B. Klug (Eds.), Children as equals: Exploring the rights of the child (pp. 49-72). Boston: University Press of America.
13. Covell, K. (2005). Violence against children in North America. United Nations Secretary-General’s study on violence against children in North American Regional Consultation.
14. Covell, K., & Howe, B. (2001a). The challenge of children’s rights for Canada. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Press.
15. Covell, K., & Howe, B. (2001b). Moral education through the 3 Rs: Rights, respect, and responsibility. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 29-41.
16. Devine, D. (2002). Children’s citizenship and the structuring of adult-child relations in the primary school. Childhood, 9(3), 303-320.
17. Dibbell, J. (1993, December 21). A rape in cyberspace. Village Voice, 38.
18. DiGiulio, R.C. (2001). Educate, medicate, or litigate? What teachers, parents, and administrators must do about student behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
19. Egan v. Canada, 2 S.C.R. 513 (1995).
20. Foster, W. P. (1989). Toward a critical practice of leadership. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 39-62). London and New York: Falmer Press.
21. Frantzi, K. (2004). Human rights education: The United Nations endeavour and the importance of childhood and intelligent sympathy. International Education Journal, 5, 1-8.
22. Fullan, M. (Ed.). (2000). The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
23. Giroux, H. (2003). The abandoned generation: Democracy beyond the culture of fear. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
24. Glaser, J., & Kahn, K.B. (2004). Prejudice, discrimination, and the Internet. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The Social Net: Human Behavior in Cyberspace. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Glover, D., Cartwright, N., & Gleeson, D. (1998). Towards bully-free schools. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
26. Harmon, A. (2004, August 26). Internet gives teenage bullies weapons to wound from afar. New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2004, from http://www.nytimes.com./2004/08/26/education
27. Herring, S.C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamic of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society, 15, 151-167.
28. Herring, S.C. (2002). Cyber violence: Recognizing and resisting abuse in online environments. Asian Women, 14, 187-212.
29. Howe, R.B. & Covell, K. (2000). Schools and the participation rights of the child. Education and Law Journal, 10, 107-123.
30. Howe, R.B. & Covell, K. (2005). Empowering children: Children’s rights as a pathway to citizenship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31. Human Rights Internet (2004a). Case studies from the Supreme Court of Canada, Baker v. Canada. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://www.hri.ca/for therecordCanada/vol3/casebaker.htm
32. Human Rights Internet (2004b). Case studies from the Supreme Court of Canada, Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://www.hri.ca/fortherecordCanada/vol3/casefoundationchildren.htm
33. Johnny, L. (2005). UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A rationale for implementing participatory rights in schools. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 40, 1-20.
34. Jubran v. North Vancouver School District et al., 10 B.C.H.R.T. (2002).
35. Katch, J. (2001). Under deadman’s skin: Discovering the meaning of children’s violent play. Boston: Beacon Press.
36. Leishman, J. (2002, October 10). Cyber-bullying: The Internet is the latest weapon in a bully’s arsenal. CBC News, The National. Retrieved on January 27, 2003, from http://cbc.ca/news/national/news/cyberbullying/index.html
37. Leithwood, K. (1999). An organizational perspective on values for leaders of future schools. In P.T. Begley (Ed.), Values and educational leadership. Albany: SUNY Press.
38. Levinson, M. (1999). The demands of a liberal education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Li, Qing (2005). Cyber-bullying in schools: The nature and extent of adolescents’ experience. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association conference in Montreal, Quebec, April.
40. Lutes v. Board of Education of Prairie View School Division No. 74, [1992], 101 Sask. R. 232 (Q.B.).
41. MacKay, W., & Burt-Gerrans, J. (2005). Student freedom of expression: Violent content and the safe school balance. McGill Journal of Education, 40(3), 423-443.
42. Miron v. Trudel, 2 S.C.R 418 (1995).
43. MNet. (2000). Young Canadians in a wired world: Phase I. Retrieved on April 2, 2007, from http://www.mediaawareness.ca/english/research/YCWW/phaseI
44. MNet. (2005). Young Canadians in a wired world: Phase II. Retrieved on April 2, 2007, from http://www.mediaawareness.ca/english/research/YCWW/phaseII/key_findings.cfm
45. Netsafe. (2005). The text generation: Mobile phones and New Zealand youth-A report of result from the Internet Safety Group’s survey of teenage mobile phone use. Netsafe.
46. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.
47. Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 3-20). New York: Guildford Press.
48. Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2007). The Ontario Safe Schools Act. School discipline and discrimination: Executive Summary. Retrieved on April 2, 2007, from http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/resources/discussion_consultation/SafeSchools ConsultRepENG.
49. Pinheiro, P. (2006). World report on violence against children. Geneva: United Nations.
50. R. v. D.W. and K.P.D., 96 B.C.P.C. (2002).
51. R. v. M.R.M., 3 S.C.R. 393 (1998).
52. Razack, S. (1999). Looking white people in the eye: Gender, race, and culture in courtrooms and classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53. Reich, R. (2002). Bridging liberalism and multiculturalism in American education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Robichaud v. Canada (Treasury Board), 2 S.C.R. 84 (1987).
55. Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, 1 S.C.R. 825 (1996).
56. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 81-89.
57. Shariff, S. (2001). The email raveger: The legal context of education. Distance education course. Burnaby, BC: Centre for Distance Education, Simon Fraser University.
58. Shariff, S. (2003). A system on trial: Identifying legal standards for educational, ethical and legally defensible approaches to bullying in schools. Doctoral dissertation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
59. Shariff, S. (2004). Keeping schools out of court: Legally defensible models of leadership to reduce cyber-bullying. Educational Forum, Delta Kappa Pi, 68(3), 222-233.
60. Shariff, S. (2005). Cyber-dilemmas in the new millennium: Balancing free expression and student safety in cyber-space. Special issue. Schools and Courts: Competing Rights in the New Millennium. McGill Journal of Education, 40(3), 467-487.
61. Shariff, S., (2006). Cyber-dilemmas: Balancing free expression and learning in a virtual school environment. International Journal of Learning 12(4), 269-78.
62. Shariff, S., & Gouin, R. (2005). Cyber-dilemmas: Gendered hierarchies, free expression and cyber-safety in schools. Paper presented at Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University. See www.oii.ox.ac.uk/cybersafety
63. Shariff, S., & Johnny, L. (2007). Cyber-libel and cyber-bullying: Can schools protect student reputations and free-expression in virtual environments? Education & Law Journal, 16(3), 307-42.
64. Shariff, S, and Johnny, L. (in press). Cyber-dilemmas: The role of the Charter in balancing freedom of expression, safety and equality in a virtual school environment. In M. Manley-Casimir (Ed.), The courts, the Charter and the schools: The impact of judicial decision-making on educational policy and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
65. Shariff, S., and Strong-Wilson, T. (2005). Bullying and new technologies: What can teachers do to foster socially responsible discourse in the physical and virtual school environments? In J. Kincheloe (Ed.), Classroom teaching: An introduction. New York: David Lang Publishers.
66. Spitzberg, B., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4, 71-92.
67. Steeves, V., & Wing, C. (2005). Young Canadians in a wired world. Phase II. Trends and recommendations. Ottawa: Media Awareness Network.
68. Tavani, H., & Grodzinsky, F. (2002). Cyberstalking, personal privacy, and moral responsibility. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 123-32.
69. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
70. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child.
71. Vriend v. Alberta, 1 S.C.R. 493 (1998).
72. Watkinson, A. (1999). Education, student rights and the Charter. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd.
73. White, P. (1996). Civic virtues and public schooling: Educating citizens for a democratic society. New York: Teachers College Press.
74. Willard, N. (2005). Educator’s guide to cyber-bullying: Addressing the harm caused by online social cruelty. Retrieved July 19, 2005 from http://cyberbully.org
75. Williams v. Eady, 10 T.L.R. 41 (1893).
76. Wyse, D. (2001). Felt tip pens and school councils: Children’s participation rights in four English schools. Children and Society, 15, 209-18.